Featured VPS Services
Razor Servers Reviews Scores
Razor Servers
www.razorservers.com
总评分: 1.9/10
总票数: 4
Ease of use
 
 
定价
 
 
功能
 
 
顾客服务
 
 
0 - 最差的   10 - 最好的
讨论 Razor Servers
NextLevelForex

从……加入成为会员 Apr 25, 2011  250个发言 Remus Miclea (NextLevelForex) Jul 17 2011 at 16:54
I'm using them for 8 months now, and here is my rating: Ease of Use: 5, Pricing: 10, Features: 7, Customer Service: 1.

I pay $20 / month for a 512 MB Hyper-V Win2K8 R2 machine, and being very close to my broker (10 ms), I like the setup. The problem is that I asked for an upgrade to 1 GB a couple of months ago. I used their ticketing system, then called them (twice, and left voice messages since no one would reply), then even used the 'contact us' form on their webpage, which is typically used by prospective clients (I thought that would help make my request higher priority, or at least more visible).

Five months later I still did not get a reply, and as a matter of fact, my support tickets were closed with no explanation (I guess they automatically close after a while; I don't want to believe they were closed by the support staff without answering the simple request in there).

I gave a 1 (rather than 0) to the Customer Service because I had a conversation with them in Dec 2010, so I know they exist and reply to emails/tickets. But because I'm stuck with the current configuration I decided to decrease the Ease of Use to 5...

In case you want to open an account with them, ask about the plans of improving the Customer Service department, because other than that, this VPS provider is offering good value.

I hope this helps, and I wish you happy trading!

He who thinks he can, and he who thinks he cannot, are both right. ~ Henry Ford
NextLevelForex

从……加入成为会员 Apr 25, 2011  250个发言 Remus Miclea (NextLevelForex) Aug 12 2011 at 17:42
Freshly obtained ping times (showing lots of packets lost) to Alpari US server (the picture is the same when pinging FXDD NY server, which tells me it's not Alpari or FXDD at fault here, but Razor Servers, who did not bother to send any announcement about maintenance or issues with their infrastructure):

>ping -t 208.122.38.253

Pinging 208.122.38.253 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Request timed out.
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Request timed out.
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=59
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Request timed out.
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59
Reply from 208.122.38.253: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 208.122.38.253:
    Packets: Sent = 38, Received = 31, Lost = 7 (18% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 4ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 4ms

He who thinks he can, and he who thinks he cannot, are both right. ~ Henry Ford
请登入账户再评论。
Consumer Price Index (YoY) (1h 17min)
GBP/USD top of trend line(19 min ago)
EURUSD 1.34028 GBPUSD 1.56596
USDJPY 95.129 USDCAD 1.02175
工具 社区 评论 平台 公司 支持
经济日历 社区 交易商 Widget 小工具 关于 常见问题
Forex Market 系统 专业人士 功能 部落格 帮助
Forex Volatility Most Popular Systems 信号提供者 API 推特 联系我们
Forex Correlation 策略 VPS Services 移动版 Facebook 错误回报!
外汇经纪商点差 比赛 EA Programming 翻译    
Forex Broker Quotes Forex Charts PAMM Brokers RSS    
Forex Broker Swaps 社区展望 Rebate Programs      
串流外汇新闻   Trading Platforms      
Forex Broker Volume          
COT Data New          

网站地图  |   合作条款  |   隐私权政策
©2012 Myfxbook Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
HIGH RISK WARNING: Foreign exchange trading carries a high level of risk that may not be suitable for all investors. Leverage creates additional risk and loss exposure. Before you decide to trade foreign exchange, carefully consider your investment objectives, experience level, and risk tolerance. You could lose some or all of your initial investment; do not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. Educate yourself on the risks associated with foreign exchange trading, and seek advice from an independent financial or tax advisor if you have any questions. Any data and information is provided 'as is' solely for informational purposes, and is not intended for trading purposes or advice.