Jarratt Davis;s student
Member Since May 20, 2011
724 posts
Feb 14, 2016 at 07:29
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach
Member Since Aug 27, 2017
994 posts
Dec 24, 2017 at 09:47
Is he a mentor? What’s the weapon of his trading? No idea about him.
Member Since Dec 25, 2017
24 posts
Dec 26, 2017 at 08:01
FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach
Really?
Dec 26, 2017 at 08:01
AniLorak posted:Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.
Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?
There are a couple of sources where you can get access to some free videos to understand JD's approach, his website Jarratt Davis and just do a search in you tube. The core training is a professional traders programme for $1997 which I believe is still offered at $997.
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.
https://imgur.com/7vFnhmY
Dec 26, 2017 at 08:01
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.
Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.
How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.
Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.
Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.
How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.
Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.
A Universal Algorithm. A Trading Edge in ANY Market.
Member Since Jan 08, 2016
281 posts
Dec 26, 2017 at 12:28
Dove777 posted:
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.
And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
forex_trader_449466
Member Since Aug 04, 2017
31 posts
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:46
SwapTrader posted:FXtrader2010 posted:
those who teach cant do, those who do don't teach
Really?
Obviously. There is more money to be made on the market if someone knows what he is doing than by teaching someone. If any trader spends time on mentoring from monday to friday, when he could be making 10 times the money by trading, he simply doesn't know how to trade.
Member Since Aug 27, 2017
994 posts
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:46
fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.
Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.
How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.
Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.
So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?
forex_trader_449466
Member Since Aug 04, 2017
31 posts
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:48
My message here got deleted. I posted that whoever can trade is not going to waste time by teaching others, but for whatever reason someone didn't like my message. For me thats confirmation I was right.
forex_trader_449466
Member Since Aug 04, 2017
31 posts
Dec 26, 2017 at 15:48
Well, now its back...this forum can be weird sometimes. 😲
Dec 27, 2017 at 07:47
Dove777 posted:AniLorak posted:Dove777 posted:
JD's approach is using fundamentals. He has tons of video out there explaining his approach.
Thank you very much for you info! Is it free or paid service?
There are a couple of sources where you can get access to some free videos to understand JD's approach, his website Jarratt Davis and just do a search in you tube. The core training is a professional traders programme for $1997 which I believe is still offered at $997.
Jarrat's track record is verified and ranked by Barclay Hedge, a service that ranks professional fund managers.
https://imgur.com/7vFnhmY
Thank you very much for your info; now it’s time to research on him.
Dec 27, 2017 at 07:49
Croco_Dile posted:
And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !
That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.
Dec 27, 2017 at 15:06
Adribaasmet posted:fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.
Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.
How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.
Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.
So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?
My guideline is to learn mathematics and/or physics, and start learning how science (true science i.e. observable, replicable, univocal) can help you find a viable expectancy. The information is out there for free in currency terms. But you will have to pay with time and efforts.
A Universal Algorithm. A Trading Edge in ANY Market.
Dec 28, 2017 at 12:00
fxphysics posted:Adribaasmet posted:fxphysics posted:
Unless any self-proclaimed 'mentor' out there can show a self-owned, consistent, long-term third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy, then he remains a total fraud in my book.
Free or paid does not matter one bit. Free will waste your time. Paid will waste both time & money.
How convenient to trade using 'fundamentals'. The theory can't be proven. Can't be disproven. Soft concepts like these are the mark of scammers.
Don't believe the hype and glossy websites, ask for proof. That long-term third-party audited track record is gold. That's why we're so few to have one. Let alone four.
So, what’s your guideline for the new Forex traders who want to learn Forex?
My guideline is to learn mathematics and/or physics, and start learning how science (true science i.e. observable, replicable, univocal) can help you find a viable expectancy. The information is out there for free in currency terms. But you will have to pay with time and efforts.
So can your mathematics and/or physics be proven with third-party audited track-record spanning at least two years and hundreds of trades proving a viable profit expectancy?
Member Since Jan 08, 2016
281 posts
Jan 04, 2018 at 05:27
Dove777 posted:Croco_Dile posted:
And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !
That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.
Even with an ordinary robot under YOUR supervision, robot+YOU can deliver MUCH better results than those professionals !
And those robots are available FOR FREE on QLM5 site..... 😎
All my results are verified, dear friend ! 🙄 🙄 You just did not bother to look ! 🙄 🙄
Complexity is expensive, inefficient, and ineffective > Crocodile trading
Jan 04, 2018 at 11:33
Croco_Dile posted:Dove777 posted:Croco_Dile posted:
And all of them with very low or even negative returns ! 😑
Lousy !
That is the best results professionals can deliver. You seem to suggest that your own performance is much better. Would you care to share your own verified results to demonstrate your comments are not hollow.
Even with an ordinary robot under YOUR supervision, robot+YOU can deliver MUCH better results than those professionals !
And those robots are available FOR FREE on QLM5 site..... 😎
All my results are verified, dear friend ! 🙄 🙄 You just did not bother to look ! 🙄 🙄
Talk is cheap. Give me the link to your 6 years of verified results.
