ShareBogie-HedgeHog-v4g (by wackena) Quick Stats
The user has deleted this system.
Bogie-HedgeHog-v4g Discussion
| Subscribe to this topic | Previous 1 .. 27 28 29 30 31 Next |
|
Member Since Mar 25, 2010 1 posts
chjsing
Apr 05 2010 at 02:21
wackena posted: tbuitendyk posted: pc8multifx posted: Don't trade live a marty system when it doesn't survive a full 10 year backtest and random backtests with the same setting! Margin call waits right around the next corner...  Looks like good advice in retrospect. Long term backtests, at best, are only potential indications of how EAs will perform in Live accounts. As an example, here is backtest from 1999.<a href='http://www.myfxbook.com/files/wackena/BogieHedgeHogUSDCHF.zip |
|
|
Member Since Nov 29, 2009 3 posts
kevin (spike38)
Apr 05 2010 at 03:20
tbuitendyk posted: pc8multifx posted: Don't trade live a marty system when it doesn't survive a full 10 year backtest and random backtests with the same setting! Margin call waits right around the next corner... Looks like good advice in retrospect. Even if you find an EA that back tests 10 yrs profitable, That doesn't mean it will survive next year. Also, If you are running live, You would be foolish to blindly think the EA, Or trade is always going to come back around. Martingales, If left unattended. Or unleashed. Can be dangerous.(only a fool trades with a blindfold) But, Myself, I have found them to be very profitable!!! -You must monitor them. -Use proper MM -Use Equity protection. -Call upon your experience, To know when to intervene. Spike |
|
|
|
Member Since Mar 03, 2010 41 posts
Rob (IslandFX)
Apr 05 2010 at 09:45
Has anybody looked at a strategy to take weekly / monthly funds out of the account as part of a Martingale system as this one? Although the annual gain would be reduced, I would have though the longevity and stability would improve.
Regards Rob Trading for a living, the best job in the world. |
|
|
|
Member Since Mar 23, 2010 1 posts
owrank
Apr 05 2010 at 10:05
wackena posted: Long term backtests, at best, are only potential indications of how EAs will perform in Live accounts. As an example, here is backtest from 1999.<a href='http://www.myfxbook.com/files/wackena/BogieHedgeHogUSDCHF.zip |
|
|
Member Since Sep 23, 2009 125 posts
wackena
Apr 05 2010 at 12:25
spike38 posted: Even if you find an EA that back tests 10 yrs profitable, That doesn't mean it will survive next year. Also, If you are running live, You would be foolish to blindly think the EA, Or trade is always going to come back around. Martingales, If left unattended. Or unleashed. Can be dangerous.(only a fool trades with a blindfold) But, Myself, I have found them to be very profitable!!! -You must monitor them. -Use proper MM -Use Equity protection. -Call upon your experience, To know when to intervene. Spike Touché "Steady Equity Growth" is the name of the game. |
|
|
|
Member Since Sep 23, 2009 125 posts
wackena
Apr 05 2010 at 12:29
chjsing posted: wackena posted: tbuitendyk posted: pc8multifx posted: Don't trade live a marty system when it doesn't survive a full 10 year backtest and random backtests with the same setting! Margin call waits right around the next corner... Looks like good advice in retrospect. Long term backtests, at best, are only potential indications of how EAs will perform in Live accounts. As an example, here is backtest from 1999.<a href='http://www.myfxbook.com/files/wackena/BogieHedgeHogUSDCHF.zip Attachments:
BogieHedgeHogEURUSD_zz.zip
"Steady Equity Growth" is the name of the game. |
|
|
|
Member Since Mar 13, 2010 23 posts
winsteadglenn
Apr 06 2010 at 22:23
Hi Wackena.
Where would you go from here, my friend? Trade only EU? Someone suggested placing buys or sells for both EU and UC simultaneously, to enable them to hedge each other. Is there merit in that thought? Thanks, Glenn |
|
|
Member Since Sep 22, 2009 9 posts
Saulius (sliux)
Apr 07 2010 at 13:15
(edited Apr 07 2010 at 13:17 )
Interesting EA, but it have few bugs and logical errors in the code. I tried to make some modifications of the source code, made optimization and started new demo account for forward testing. You can watch my progress with this system here:
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/sliux/bhhmo/25099 |
|
|
|
Member Since Sep 23, 2009 125 posts
wackena
Apr 07 2010 at 14:27
winsteadglenn posted: Hi Wackena. Where would you go from here, my friend? Trade only EU? Someone suggested placing buys or sells for both EU and UC simultaneously, to enable them to hedge each other. Is there merit in that thought? Thanks, Glenn As long as the major reason for price changes on the 2 pairs are from a weak or stronger $USD, then the reverse correlation is quite close. But when the Euro or CHF effect price then the correlation is off. The EA would need to only place Hedge Trades for these 2 pairs only when price change is only from a weak or stronger $USD, Maybe monitoring MA cross on several $USD pairs and if all agree on weaker or stronger $USD, then place hedge trades on EURUSD and USDCHF. "Steady Equity Growth" is the name of the game. |
|
|
Member Since Feb 26, 2010 21 posts
Dale (4xfreak)
Apr 08 2010 at 17:11
sliux posted: Interesting EA, but it have few bugs and logical errors in the code. I tried to make some modifications of the source code, made optimization and started new demo account for forward testing. You can watch my progress with this system here: http://www.myfxbook.com/members/sliux/bhhmo/25099 |
| Subscribe to this topic | Previous 1 .. 27 28 29 30 31 Next |
