Brent vs Wti (By Trejder)
The user has deleted this system.
Brent vs Wti Discussion
Dec 22, 2014 at 06:28
485 Views
9 Replies
Member Since Feb 04, 2012
85 posts
Jan 01, 2015 at 22:38
Hi,
Is it an EA?
Is it an EA?
Jan 02, 2015 at 19:13
Very, Very, Very, good.
Hi Trejder!
You developed the EA?
- I'm analyzing programming.
- I have some doubts and would like to ask.
- I'm looking at other EAs correlation, but on top of coins and all fail in DD.
- This is the first I see and makes commodity. Very interesting.
- The version is V1 this is the most up to date?
- He looks like he is making a profit and has no DD.
Kind Regards,
Psadi (Legion)
Hi Trejder!
You developed the EA?
- I'm analyzing programming.
- I have some doubts and would like to ask.
- I'm looking at other EAs correlation, but on top of coins and all fail in DD.
- This is the first I see and makes commodity. Very interesting.
- The version is V1 this is the most up to date?
- He looks like he is making a profit and has no DD.
Kind Regards,
Psadi (Legion)
Jan 02, 2015 at 20:31
psadi posted:Yes I am developer of this EA.
Very, Very, Very, good.
Hi Trejder!
You developed the EA?
- I'm analyzing programming.
- I have some doubts and would like to ask.
- I'm looking at other EAs correlation, but on top of coins and all fail in DD.
- This is the first I see and makes commodity. Very interesting.
- The version is V1 this is the most up to date?
- He looks like he is making a profit and has no DD.
Kind Regards,
Psadi (Legion)
Here is second one:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Trejder/korelator-cacdax-555/1026725
it works on DAX and CAC40 indices.
This, however, is overloaded and has, therefore has a large DD. I think that trade on oil is more secure. This is a link to the Polish forum in which I write a lot about my ideas on the correlation. If you understand something ...? :)
https://forex-nawigator.biz/forum/korelacja-par-t23348-190.html#p729129
tex.jarek@
Jan 08, 2015 at 12:10
Hello Traeider!
I saw the site in Polish.
No problem. Google translate for me ...;-)
I am sending you the graph of positions held.
Note that the system only bought 'USOil' and yet not had an operation to 'UKOil'.
Checked before if there was any problem or naming error, because it has sufficient funds in the account.
The account I am using is the FXCM.
The system would not have to buy and sell both COMODITES? Or it analyzes both COMODITES and opens the most advantageous operation?
If you have no idea why this happened, and need more information. Just ask.
Kind Regards,
Psadi (Legion)
I saw the site in Polish.
No problem. Google translate for me ...;-)
I am sending you the graph of positions held.
Note that the system only bought 'USOil' and yet not had an operation to 'UKOil'.
Checked before if there was any problem or naming error, because it has sufficient funds in the account.
The account I am using is the FXCM.
The system would not have to buy and sell both COMODITES? Or it analyzes both COMODITES and opens the most advantageous operation?
If you have no idea why this happened, and need more information. Just ask.
Kind Regards,
Psadi (Legion)
Jan 08, 2015 at 12:32
do not understand why you are trading currency pairs at the same time and oil?
This is an EA?
Of course, if you want to trade on the basis of correlation on oil that you need to have open simultaneously opposing positions on the US and the UK OIL OIL.
This is an EA?
Of course, if you want to trade on the basis of correlation on oil that you need to have open simultaneously opposing positions on the US and the UK OIL OIL.
tex.jarek@
Jan 13, 2015 at 09:14
psadi posted:Off course he should have bought the two COMODITES.
Hi Trejder!
I am negotiating with EA only Oil.
But He only bought USOil. He should have bought the two COMODITES while, but did not buy.
Or does not always happen?
Regards
What is a robo?
tex.jarek@
*Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.
