Bladerunner, did you read the article on the link I posted? Integration with NN filter made the TFOT improve results (on backtest) from a profit factor of 1.52 to 1.90. If the same can be accomplished for FGB, we could maybe improve FGB performance by 25%.

Note that I said 'if'. I am threading on new waters here. I have traded many robots, but this is the first time I get into this promise of neural network filter. By the way, NeoTradeFx has NOT been able to deliver good performance based on NN: http://eareview.net/live-forward-test/neotradex

   stevetrade posted:
   I'm bemused as to why people aren't happy with FGB's performance. This EA relies on a solid trading methodology and backtests well over a sustained period of time. It's simple, put some money in an account, leave it for several years to compound. Retire.

That is of course providing the Euro lasts that long ;)



totally agree with you steve about fgb ,i think the euro will not be shut but only diminished ,certain banks told that they won't let it go under 1.20... like the chf following up on this one

   grgr posted:
   If they can improve performance to even make it better why shouldn't they try?


When you bought FGB, you got what you paid for. It is a customizable expert advisor. It is you that can do the improvement, to adapt it to various market conditions (volatility, momentum etc.) should you know what those settings are about... SO forget the vendor's further intervention regarding the performance. Their job is to keep FGB bug-free, to update it in line with MT4 updates and protect it against decompilers...

Good luck!

I've got like 140ms ping between my VPS<->broker site while my computer has 36 ms (however, seems to be the same with for example thinkforex.com)

BTW as an english man, are yo happy the EUR dies or what?
For you it'll be some kind of victory of GBP against the rest??