NumberOne Impulsive Scalper (by Lorenzo) Szybkie statystyki
|
|
|
NumberOne Impulsive Scalper Dyskusja
| Subskrybuj ten temat | Poprzedni 1 .. 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 .. 59 Następny |
|
Członek od Jul 30, 2010 214 postów
Daltanious (Lorenzo)
Jul 13 2012 at 15:33
Hello: But i believe very in sharing user, from your point of view understand you say: all okay...,it's your job, is your gain, what should you say? But if there are multiple users ,and also on the forums are apparently conflicting statements... Is not as state We believe in that too. This is why we created a forum to collect users experience and trades, and this is why we are teaching how to properly use an Expert Advisor (and not only NumberOne). A lot of people do not even understand what money management meaning, nor freeze level, stop level or liquidity, a I had users running the scalper from their home PC with a 800 milliseconds PING to the broker server, I had users running the EA with 5 lots (we advised 3 lots is tha maximum) and reducing the lots after a loss... and I could write a LOT about other cases. On top of that scalping and Forex trading is RISKY by itself and a lot of brokers do their dirty jobs behind... What we can't accept is to being pointed as scammers without FACTS by people who normally are used to buy their million dollar dream at 49.99$ and drop it (in silence) after some well hidden losses... not mentioning the fact that we're RUINING scammers business trying to make people aware of everything. That's is at least my opinion about. ![]() Regards, l. Beati monoculi in terra caecorum |
|
|
Członek od Jul 30, 2010 214 postów
Daltanious (Lorenzo)
Jul 13 2012 at 21:23
Just to talk about some users results:
http://www.steadyonfx.com/forum/index.php?topic=164.msg3876#msg3876 Beati monoculi in terra caecorum |
|
|
|
Członek od Feb 09, 2011 270 postów
crashev
Jul 15 2012 at 19:44
Ok, give me 100$ and I will take it :)
Better to lose an oportunity than a money |
|
|
Członek od May 01, 2012 7 postów
Jeremy Foo (darkdome)
Jul 16 2012 at 05:03
LOL..I laughed really hard the way u phrased it haha
There are so many people out there who will tell you that you can’t. What you’ve got to do is turn around and say, ‘watch me’ |
|
|
|
Członek od Feb 09, 2011 270 postów
crashev
Jul 16 2012 at 07:47
The problem with this EA (not with the strategy) is that it does not exploit market patterns/cycles or weakness, it does exploit broker weakness - and that will not work for a longer term. That is also a reason why there are only several (right now just 2?) brokers who have conditions for this EA.
I consider such strategy not real market strategy for making real money with real feed market. Better to lose an oportunity than a money |
|
|
|
Członek od Nov 30, 2011 10 postów
JanusTrading
Jul 16 2012 at 07:56
crashev posted: The problem with this EA (not with the strategy) is that it does not exploit market patterns/cycles or weakness, it does exploit broker weakness - and that will not work for a longer term. That is also a reason why there are only several (right now just 2?) brokers who have conditions for this EA. I consider such strategy not real market strategy for making real money with real feed market. You overlook that this strategy pushes MT4 to its limits and that it needs to be transformed via FixAPI protocol to other and much better/faster platforms, which everybody, but retail FX traders use. MT4 was never designed for such strategies and that is the reason why broker selection is so very limited and important. JT |
|
|
Członek od Jul 30, 2010 214 postów
Daltanious (Lorenzo)
Jul 16 2012 at 14:23
crashev posted: The problem with this EA (not with the strategy) is that it does not exploit market patterns/cycles or weakness, it does exploit broker weakness - and that will not work for a longer term. That is also a reason why there are only several (right now just 2?) brokers who have conditions for this EA. I consider such strategy not real market strategy for making real money with real feed market. What you wrote is too generic, and as you wrote that it applies also to every other MT4 scalping EA... with the notable difference that we posted more than one real and certified statement with 6+ MOTHS of trading.... now every Monsieur de La Palice think to have found the point... I wonder if you wrote exactly the same thing on EVERY super million dollar scalper posted like the true 'el dorado' here on myfxbook... Additionally the EA do NOT explot broker weakness, it explore broker HONESTY and EFFICIENCY and WILL to allow scalping. This is NOT an arbitrage this is not a flooding of trading servers... this is just a simple strategy that WORKS where brokers allows that. Additionally a trader don't need 100 different brokers, just one RELIABLE broker (like our actual ILQ custom feed for instance) where to trade in safety. Regards, l. Beati monoculi in terra caecorum |
|
|
|
Członek od Feb 09, 2011 270 postów
crashev
Jul 17 2012 at 08:29
Slippage=0 has nothing to do with real market conditions and broker HONESTY, someone is paying for Your slippage=0, so yes it works on FxPrimus because of slippage=0 and You exploit this broker wakeness, in normal market conditions retraces on high volatility have very low liquidity and slippage at least fractions of pips or even 1 pip is a very normal thing.
Yes I know that You posted real accounts, and that's very transparent on Your side, but You are also aware that many other users don't get same conditions even at FxPrimus and reporting bad results here and there because of that. Don't know about ILQ, is slippage at ilq also = 0 the same as in Fxprimus on Your account ? Can You also assure that new users will get the same results and conditions at FxPrimus that You have if they are so honest broker ? If it is the way You say, then it should not be problem to give a full gurantee of that ? Better to lose an oportunity than a money |
|
|
Członek od Jul 30, 2010 214 postów
Daltanious (Lorenzo)
Jul 18 2012 at 09:50
crashev posted: Slippage=0 has nothing to do with real market conditions and broker HONESTY, someone is paying for Your slippage=0, so yes it works on FxPrimus because of slippage=0 and You exploit this broker wakeness, in normal market conditions retraces on high volatility have very low liquidity and slippage at least fractions of pips or even 1 pip is a very normal thing. Yes I know that You posted real accounts, and that's very transparent on Your side, but You are also aware that many other users don't get same conditions even at FxPrimus and reporting bad results here and there because of that. Don't know about ILQ, is slippage at ilq also = 0 the same as in Fxprimus on Your account ? Can You also assure that new users will get the same results and conditions at FxPrimus that You have if they are so honest broker ? If it is the way You say, then it should not be problem to give a full gurantee of that ? Slippage 0 has EVERYTHING to share with HONESTY. If you broker can't grant 0 slippage (or a LITTLE <1 pip slippage, even favorable too time to time, otherwise it is matematycally proved that it is a scam) it means two things: 1) Not enough liquidity even for your 'little' order (1-2-3 lots are nothing and MUST be 'nothing' even in an OTC pool) 2) Tricks on feed filtering & spread management And that's all. The're no 'very low liquidity' specially if you sending a 1 lot order on a so called 'super broker' LOL. If they say 'low liquidity' it means that they SUCKS and they must be abandoned quickly. No exploitation at all, maybe just a HONESTY exploitation as I wrote before. I do NOT say that FxPrimus is honest, that it will work forever, that I grant something. I say that these are statement, these are number, I say that we support our users (soon we will introduce 2 more brokers that welcome NO operations, and note that we had no negotiations at all with FxPrimus) and that we are clear and transparent. You see the statement you know the risk, you are supported in the EA use (with update and help if needed)... are you MATURE enough to chose what to do (and what to RISK) with your money or not? Do you understand the point? The user must be a serious and responsible user, must KNOW how to manage a software, a VPS must understand Money Management and how brokers and the forex market works... We are NOT interested in gambles but in investors who, if they want, could even play with their money if they like it... but in a thought out (and informed) manner. That's the difference! Regards, l. Beati monoculi in terra caecorum |
|
|
|
Członek od Feb 09, 2011 270 postów
crashev
Jul 18 2012 at 10:40
It's not about 'not enough liquidity overall' ,it's about lack of liqudity during the spikes. And yes real market slips during high volatiluity spikes! If You get 0 slippage then it is proven You'r not dealing with real market but playing against broker and being b-booked and that will not be like this forever.
I will be watching this thread and see how Your new brokers works, but I still think You'r exploiting broker not the market, and for Your wins pays broker not the market participants. Better to lose an oportunity than a money |
| Subskrybuj ten temat | Poprzedni 1 .. 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 .. 59 Następny |

Share
