Just curious which settings you are using for the unsupported pairs: GBPUSD and USDJPY. Pretty risky scalping USDJPY during 22-23 GMT; however, live results look decent so far.

This one looks likes it could be a stud.

Looks like the default parameters are having a rough time with the two commodity pairs. Given the highly correlated nature of the remaining test pairs, it seems logical that an equity protection EA running with a slightly wider stop of 10.0 than the default 6.7 may improve the equity curve. I'm running this setup now on my own forward demo test, along with the GBPJPY pair.

[quote]pc8multifx posted: You don't get it... Demo acc. are useless when it comes to show the real performance of these scalping EAs, no matter what sort of broker. [/quote] I don't find demos on traditional dealing desk accounts to be worth anything, and ECN/STP demos to be only slightly better than worthless. That's why I requested an ECN/STP demo, as it would be better than what we are currently looking at, but again, still not worth much. I have personally experienced slippage live of as much as 10 full pips on entry using a scalper on an ECN that shall remain nameless, while the sam......

What I mean is that the perf looks quite similar to an EA called FX Genius, which works great on demo, but is impractical for real world application. It arbitrages the latency between the price feed from two different brokers, and given how fast this one opens and close positions, the trade pattern that Dragon generates looks similar to me. In live trading the "slave" or slower broker always ends up requoting you to death, and you never get the fill the demo feed got.