First a comment on the idea of banning someone, trolls included or deleting their post is wrong and more offensive than the crap that you have to wade through from the trolls. I would leave the forum if they started doing that. It's far better to teach respect than to limit freedoms because that puts one person in authority over their fellow human, and that is the very definition of evil.
Now, Matt claims that I don't have a right to speak because my systems don't generate 100% a month but that is because he has limiting ideas that he didn't include. Let's think outside the box and see if we can make 100% a month with my systems. There are 7 billion people on the planet, so my solution would have to suit others - not just me, so I will have to use numbers that anyone can achieve.
Here is my solution then. If someone is working in some dusty mill or any job that they don't like, they would want to replace their income with a passive income like my robots do, right? Now if any of my students tell one of their friends how there is a super safe system that they could use to retire with, I pay that referring student $200. Their cost to be my student is $800. So the risk is $800, and to make 100% profit would require 4 referrals a month. Shouldn't be much of a problem for a hands off investment system that doesn't lose very often.
You may not like my solution but it fits the stupid premise. The best way to get high returns is in the stock market where shares can sell for a buck. Limited losses, this is good, unlimited gain potential, this is even better. And it's easy for a stock to go from one to two dollars making a 100% profit. But here's something that's important that makes this whole thread off topic – and that is, the larger the balance the more difficult it is to get higher percentages. If you start dealing in millions, there just isn't a program out there that can do much better than ten percent.
Anyway, that's my two cents worth … Bob
where research touches lives.