AlgoTradeSoft | Innovative EA | FXCM (By AlgoTradeSoft)
The user has made his system private.
Edit Your Comment
AlgoTradeSoft | Innovative EA | FXCM Discussion
Apr 11, 2016 at 06:16
Member Since Jan 07, 2016
86 posts
johndoe2016 posted:
Will there be a PAMM / MAM / signal solution for this account?
Hello, I really doubt this would work via signal copier due to extremely low latency needed.
My offers: FXCM $4.99/RT, Pepperstone Razor AUD$6/RT, VantageFX $4.30/RT, ICMarkets AUD$5.50/RT - no mark-up spread or slippage!
Ozzie Matt (aeronthomas)
Member Since Dec 04, 2010
1557 posts
Jun 07, 2016 at 07:38
Member Since Dec 04, 2010
1557 posts
VNTOPFX posted:let us know how it performs on real account.
I bough this EA from you sale. Can we use default setting or have adjust by broker ? I am using account on Tickmill broker.
Jun 14, 2016 at 15:14
Member Since May 24, 2012
49 posts
patrickx posted:
After exactly 2 MONTHS of LIVE TESTING this EA under various brokers, my final results from Jan 15th, 2016 are these (in gross pips): master's FXCM +125 pips, my VantageFX ECN RAW +121 pips, my IC Markets ECN +103 pips and my FXCM UK +85 pips. PM me for questions, stats and details (avg spread, slippage, etc...).
NONE of your accounts are verified
TRADE WHAT YOU EXPECT NOT WHAT YOU SEE :) !!!
Jul 01, 2016 at 13:58
Member Since Sep 15, 2011
20 posts
This EA cannot now work as there are thousands of pending orders trying to get a fill or a close at the same instant in time from the limited liquidity availably to every FX broker. Changing broker won't help. It is probably a dead duck as a result!😭
eogorman@
Jul 13, 2016 at 14:22
Member Since Apr 06, 2015
4 posts
aeronthomas posted:I loss on Tickmill broker. Maybe only win on FXCMVNTOPFX posted:let us know how it performs on real account.
I bough this EA from you sale. Can we use default setting or have adjust by broker ? I am using account on Tickmill broker.
Apply both technical and price action for auto trading
Member Since Oct 25, 2013
20 posts
Aug 01, 2016 at 05:59
Member Since Apr 15, 2013
2 posts
AlgoTradeSoft posted:
Hi everyone!
Innovative EA - commercial fully automated fx robot.
The EA is highly efficient due to the adaptive trade management algorithm,which allows winners run and cuts losses immediately.
It was backtested and optimized using real ticks with 99,9% quality.BackTest 99,9% quality:
https://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/algotradesoft-innovative-ea-v-950time/90077
The Expert Advisor has successfully passed the stress test with slippage and commission approximate to the real market conditions.
We developed in EA slippages control algorithm, it gather statistic for slippages, calculate total trading cost and will warning you if trading condition on your broker is unprofitable, here how it look:
https://prntscr.com/99wk9y
You can buy EA on MQL5, here url:
https://mql5.com/7eu9
In new update(soon):
Slippages Control Algorithm will help you find broker with best trading conditions and warning you about bad broker to save your money.
Regards,
Alex
Thank you so much for your information.
Member Since Oct 25, 2013
20 posts
Aug 03, 2016 at 10:13
Member Since Oct 25, 2013
20 posts
Hello again,
I am very interested in purchasing the EA but $30,000 is a lot of money, so just a few final questions please:
- just to confirm as I'm new to this; that 5 PCs means 'unlimited' accounts on 5 different servers?
- does your activation allows for PC changes... such as moving from a VPS to a dedicated server?
- for the managed account; is this the same EA and same settings that I could use on my own if I buy the EA?
- is there enough liquidity left to ensure profitability ie. Some are saying that large lot sizes results in poor performance? Please clarify...i will keep your answer to myself of course. Also what lot size is large?
- can the EA be run alongside another EA on same account? Can I set a separate magic number and comment for your EA trades in order to prevent order conflict between EAs?
Thank you and regards
Ian
I am very interested in purchasing the EA but $30,000 is a lot of money, so just a few final questions please:
- just to confirm as I'm new to this; that 5 PCs means 'unlimited' accounts on 5 different servers?
- does your activation allows for PC changes... such as moving from a VPS to a dedicated server?
- for the managed account; is this the same EA and same settings that I could use on my own if I buy the EA?
- is there enough liquidity left to ensure profitability ie. Some are saying that large lot sizes results in poor performance? Please clarify...i will keep your answer to myself of course. Also what lot size is large?
- can the EA be run alongside another EA on same account? Can I set a separate magic number and comment for your EA trades in order to prevent order conflict between EAs?
Thank you and regards
Ian
Groupotrade (GroupoTrade)
Member Since Nov 21, 2015
4 posts
Member Since Nov 12, 2010
174 posts
Aug 08, 2016 at 05:20
Member Since Nov 12, 2010
174 posts
The price for this EA is much too high for the EA based on what I see. To start, for realistic results in backtesting, I always use 2.5 pips as the spread so that covers most brokers rather than this one needing to be broker specific. I can easily make a backtest that is very similar if I make the spread as tight as he does.
I would suggest avoiding this EA unless you have very tight spreads and only once more forward test data is available.
I otherwise provide my EAs on a trial basis for 2 months for someone to test live on a broker of their choice.
I would suggest avoiding this EA unless you have very tight spreads and only once more forward test data is available.
I otherwise provide my EAs on a trial basis for 2 months for someone to test live on a broker of their choice.
See my profile or message me for my latest EA
Oct 07, 2016 at 07:47
Member Since Oct 04, 2016
4 posts
Hello, I have an account at FXCM and a MM runs this EA for me.
I decided to go public to ask you some question and to get some advice from you traders.
My account, note all withdrawals are commission costs:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/TradALot/ats-scalping-fxcm/1809273
For comparison the Account from ATS, note that Deposits/Withdrawals is private:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AlgoTradeSoft/algotradesoft-innovative-ea/1373958
As of today, you see a Gain of -0.38% on my account which is ok.
But FXCM seems to handle commission costs as withdrawals.
All withdrawals you see on my account are trading commissions.
This makes my real Gain -5.4% after 6 days.
The problem I see is that the real trading costs and the real Gain is hidden on FXCM.
My questions are:
1) Does FXCM always handle commission costs as withdrawals which hides this costs from Gain?
2) I pay USD 8 per 1 Lot round turn at FXCM. Is there a way to get lower commissions?
3) Should I quit this now, because commission will eat up my account in few weeks?
4) Does anyone run this EA on FXCM with same commission costs and makes money with it or does this simply never work if you calculate real Gain (commission hidden as withdrawals)?
Anny suggestions, opinions and ideas are welcome!
Best regards, TradALot
I decided to go public to ask you some question and to get some advice from you traders.
My account, note all withdrawals are commission costs:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/TradALot/ats-scalping-fxcm/1809273
For comparison the Account from ATS, note that Deposits/Withdrawals is private:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AlgoTradeSoft/algotradesoft-innovative-ea/1373958
As of today, you see a Gain of -0.38% on my account which is ok.
But FXCM seems to handle commission costs as withdrawals.
All withdrawals you see on my account are trading commissions.
This makes my real Gain -5.4% after 6 days.
The problem I see is that the real trading costs and the real Gain is hidden on FXCM.
My questions are:
1) Does FXCM always handle commission costs as withdrawals which hides this costs from Gain?
2) I pay USD 8 per 1 Lot round turn at FXCM. Is there a way to get lower commissions?
3) Should I quit this now, because commission will eat up my account in few weeks?
4) Does anyone run this EA on FXCM with same commission costs and makes money with it or does this simply never work if you calculate real Gain (commission hidden as withdrawals)?
Anny suggestions, opinions and ideas are welcome!
Best regards, TradALot
Lazellnet Labs (lazellnet)
Member Since Nov 24, 2012
29 posts
Oct 13, 2016 at 06:12
Member Since Nov 24, 2012
29 posts
TradALot posted:
Hello, I have an account at FXCM and a MM runs this EA for me.
I decided to go public to ask you some question and to get some advice from you traders.
My account, note all withdrawals are commission costs:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/TradALot/ats-scalping-fxcm/1809273
For comparison the Account from ATS, note that Deposits/Withdrawals is private:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AlgoTradeSoft/algotradesoft-innovative-ea/1373958
As of today, you see a Gain of -0.38% on my account which is ok.
But FXCM seems to handle commission costs as withdrawals.
All withdrawals you see on my account are trading commissions.
This makes my real Gain -5.4% after 6 days.
The problem I see is that the real trading costs and the real Gain is hidden on FXCM.
My questions are:
1) Does FXCM always handle commission costs as withdrawals which hides this costs from Gain?
2) I pay USD 8 per 1 Lot round turn at FXCM. Is there a way to get lower commissions?
3) Should I quit this now, because commission will eat up my account in few weeks?
4) Does anyone run this EA on FXCM with same commission costs and makes money with it or does this simply never work if you calculate real Gain (commission hidden as withdrawals)?
Anny suggestions, opinions and ideas are welcome!
Best regards, TradALot
Expectancy your trade is -0.2 pips, even if you pay $4 commission per 1 lots you still loss, need minimum Expectancy 0.8 pips to cover fxcm commission $8 per 1 lots

*Commercial use and spam will not be tolerated, and may result in account termination.
Tip: Posting an image/youtube url will automatically embed it in your post!
Tip: Type the @ sign to auto complete a username participating in this discussion.