Still being disingenuous.... it is not a valid comparison and you should stop stating falsehoods. General Max Floating Point DD is < 10%, with ~50% growth in a year.... 20% FP DD with the mentioned x2 risk only happened once almost 2 years ago.
What you write makes no sense.... worth to you is different from worth to another. How many systems die, making people lose all their money in Forex... MOST! If Vendor instructions are followed, you would get same result as published account, as my trades mirror that closely.
50% growth last year for me, with max FP DD at any time of < 10% (usually < 5%), with continued stability and safe account growth is worth it to me, while other systems that make 300% in 6 months, and then crash to zero...not worth it. I am very happy with 50% growth a year, and a safe and stable system, where I feel my account is not at risk. Am sure most others would agree.
You are conflating a failed system, vs a result on that other account that is by design/expectations. The account you are referencing was used outside of normal configurations as desired by the trader.
Any system can make 100% a week if the risk is set high, while risking the account balance.
There are clear configuration guidelines, and understood expectations of returns by viewing the published account, with demonstrated stability, when following the configuration guidelines in a 'Set it/Forget it'configuration.
You are trolling this discussion vintogr, without knowing facts, and you should stop.