Bewertung: Full Star Full Star Full Star Empty Star Empty Star
is it possible to turn $100 to $1000 in 4 weeks ? (real account)
Zurück 1 .. 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 .. 55 Nächste
MyFxTrader

Mitglied seit Dec 31, 2013  170 Beiträge MyFxTrader Dec 15 2014 at 10:33 (bearbeitet Dec 15 2014 at 10:33 )
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
marran posted:
will you be releasing your EA to everyone?


I am surprised you think it is an EA. The first conclusion most people say is: 'this is only possible with manual trading. There is no such thing as a Holy Grail EA.'

But if it works manually, why would it not work automatically? Bad programming? Or fundamental analysis (lack of)?


EA is predictable. Metaquotes has ability to read the codes once the EA is running. They know exactly what the EA will do. Thus, broker is always ahead of EA. Manual trading is less predictable.


Thank you for your input. So you are saying that MQL5 (developer of MT4) receives all the information from every / any MT4, and then colludes with the broker to work against the trader using an EA? There are a lot of MT4 accounts with hundreds of brokers, with thousands of EAs out there, all doing different things when the market moves on different instruments (forex, indexes, stocks)...

Can you provide some evidence to backup your knowledge? How do you know this? MQL5 must have an awfully big task being Big Brother! eek


If MetaTrader could cope with the tens of thousands of transactions across a wide latitude of instruments simultaneously with ease, there's no reason to think that to deal with every single trade individually is too big a task for them and is beyond their means. Many forums have brought into light regarding the MetaTrader individual 'plugin' which makes life difficult for traders.

By coding a system into an EA and then running it on the chart, we effectively revealed the blueprint of entire trading system to the broker. Even though we coded the EA, the fact remains that both the Metatrader & the MQL are proprietary of MetaQuotes. They are the boss. We are merely playing at their tuft. And to reveal our every move to them in the form of an EA makes matter worse.

What I'm saying is it easy for them to manipulated the feed if they choose to and whenever the opportunity is presented to them with this individual 'plugin' to mitigate an EA from making profits as they already know all the moves in advance. Manual trading on the other hand suffers no such deficiency. That's why a successful manual system very often become less profitable once it's running on an EA. But of course there is only so much they can do because there is definitely a threshold on how much the feed can be manipulated.


That's pure nonsense. The computing power needed would be beyond capacity of any computer. Moreover they have much simpler tools like the plugin you mentioned.


The nonsense is all coming from you. Computer? Right they use home PCs as their servers.

Opinions are like butt-holes; everybody has one and it usually stinks.
togr

Mitglied seit Feb 22, 2011  3969 Beiträge vontogr (togr) Dec 15 2014 at 11:38
MyFxTrader posted:
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
marran posted:
will you be releasing your EA to everyone?


I am surprised you think it is an EA. The first conclusion most people say is: 'this is only possible with manual trading. There is no such thing as a Holy Grail EA.'

But if it works manually, why would it not work automatically? Bad programming? Or fundamental analysis (lack of)?


EA is predictable. Metaquotes has ability to read the codes once the EA is running. They know exactly what the EA will do. Thus, broker is always ahead of EA. Manual trading is less predictable.


Thank you for your input. So you are saying that MQL5 (developer of MT4) receives all the information from every / any MT4, and then colludes with the broker to work against the trader using an EA? There are a lot of MT4 accounts with hundreds of brokers, with thousands of EAs out there, all doing different things when the market moves on different instruments (forex, indexes, stocks)...

Can you provide some evidence to backup your knowledge? How do you know this? MQL5 must have an awfully big task being Big Brother! eek


If MetaTrader could cope with the tens of thousands of transactions across a wide latitude of instruments simultaneously with ease, there's no reason to think that to deal with every single trade individually is too big a task for them and is beyond their means. Many forums have brought into light regarding the MetaTrader individual 'plugin' which makes life difficult for traders.

By coding a system into an EA and then running it on the chart, we effectively revealed the blueprint of entire trading system to the broker. Even though we coded the EA, the fact remains that both the Metatrader & the MQL are proprietary of MetaQuotes. They are the boss. We are merely playing at their tuft. And to reveal our every move to them in the form of an EA makes matter worse.

What I'm saying is it easy for them to manipulated the feed if they choose to and whenever the opportunity is presented to them with this individual 'plugin' to mitigate an EA from making profits as they already know all the moves in advance. Manual trading on the other hand suffers no such deficiency. That's why a successful manual system very often become less profitable once it's running on an EA. But of course there is only so much they can do because there is definitely a threshold on how much the feed can be manipulated.


That's pure nonsense. The computing power needed would be beyond capacity of any computer. Moreover they have much simpler tools like the plugin you mentioned.


The nonsense is all coming from you. Computer? Right they use home PCs as their servers.


Yes and FBI is reading you mind... Do you wear an alluminium hat :)

I like what I trade, I trade what I like
Furax

Mitglied seit Oct 28, 2010  92 Beiträge Furax Dec 15 2014 at 11:51 (bearbeitet Dec 15 2014 at 11:56 )

On entend l'arbre qui tombe mais pas la forêt qui pousse...
MyFxTrader

Mitglied seit Dec 31, 2013  170 Beiträge MyFxTrader Dec 15 2014 at 12:15 (bearbeitet Dec 15 2014 at 12:16 )
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
marran posted:
will you be releasing your EA to everyone?


I am surprised you think it is an EA. The first conclusion most people say is: 'this is only possible with manual trading. There is no such thing as a Holy Grail EA.'

But if it works manually, why would it not work automatically? Bad programming? Or fundamental analysis (lack of)?


EA is predictable. Metaquotes has ability to read the codes once the EA is running. They know exactly what the EA will do. Thus, broker is always ahead of EA. Manual trading is less predictable.


Thank you for your input. So you are saying that MQL5 (developer of MT4) receives all the information from every / any MT4, and then colludes with the broker to work against the trader using an EA? There are a lot of MT4 accounts with hundreds of brokers, with thousands of EAs out there, all doing different things when the market moves on different instruments (forex, indexes, stocks)...

Can you provide some evidence to backup your knowledge? How do you know this? MQL5 must have an awfully big task being Big Brother! eek


If MetaTrader could cope with the tens of thousands of transactions across a wide latitude of instruments simultaneously with ease, there's no reason to think that to deal with every single trade individually is too big a task for them and is beyond their means. Many forums have brought into light regarding the MetaTrader individual 'plugin' which makes life difficult for traders.

By coding a system into an EA and then running it on the chart, we effectively revealed the blueprint of entire trading system to the broker. Even though we coded the EA, the fact remains that both the Metatrader & the MQL are proprietary of MetaQuotes. They are the boss. We are merely playing at their tuft. And to reveal our every move to them in the form of an EA makes matter worse.

What I'm saying is it easy for them to manipulated the feed if they choose to and whenever the opportunity is presented to them with this individual 'plugin' to mitigate an EA from making profits as they already know all the moves in advance. Manual trading on the other hand suffers no such deficiency. That's why a successful manual system very often become less profitable once it's running on an EA. But of course there is only so much they can do because there is definitely a threshold on how much the feed can be manipulated.


That's pure nonsense. The computing power needed would be beyond capacity of any computer. Moreover they have much simpler tools like the plugin you mentioned.


The nonsense is all coming from you. Computer? Right they use home PCs as their servers.


Yes and FBI is reading you mind... Do you wear an alluminium hat :)


As usual nothing more than a load of crock coming from someone with the mentality of a 16 year old schoolboy.

Opinions are like butt-holes; everybody has one and it usually stinks.
togr

Mitglied seit Feb 22, 2011  3969 Beiträge vontogr (togr) Dec 15 2014 at 12:18
MyFxTrader posted:
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
marran posted:
will you be releasing your EA to everyone?


I am surprised you think it is an EA. The first conclusion most people say is: 'this is only possible with manual trading. There is no such thing as a Holy Grail EA.'

But if it works manually, why would it not work automatically? Bad programming? Or fundamental analysis (lack of)?


EA is predictable. Metaquotes has ability to read the codes once the EA is running. They know exactly what the EA will do. Thus, broker is always ahead of EA. Manual trading is less predictable.


Thank you for your input. So you are saying that MQL5 (developer of MT4) receives all the information from every / any MT4, and then colludes with the broker to work against the trader using an EA? There are a lot of MT4 accounts with hundreds of brokers, with thousands of EAs out there, all doing different things when the market moves on different instruments (forex, indexes, stocks)...

Can you provide some evidence to backup your knowledge? How do you know this? MQL5 must have an awfully big task being Big Brother! eek


If MetaTrader could cope with the tens of thousands of transactions across a wide latitude of instruments simultaneously with ease, there's no reason to think that to deal with every single trade individually is too big a task for them and is beyond their means. Many forums have brought into light regarding the MetaTrader individual 'plugin' which makes life difficult for traders.

By coding a system into an EA and then running it on the chart, we effectively revealed the blueprint of entire trading system to the broker. Even though we coded the EA, the fact remains that both the Metatrader & the MQL are proprietary of MetaQuotes. They are the boss. We are merely playing at their tuft. And to reveal our every move to them in the form of an EA makes matter worse.

What I'm saying is it easy for them to manipulated the feed if they choose to and whenever the opportunity is presented to them with this individual 'plugin' to mitigate an EA from making profits as they already know all the moves in advance. Manual trading on the other hand suffers no such deficiency. That's why a successful manual system very often become less profitable once it's running on an EA. But of course there is only so much they can do because there is definitely a threshold on how much the feed can be manipulated.


That's pure nonsense. The computing power needed would be beyond capacity of any computer. Moreover they have much simpler tools like the plugin you mentioned.


The nonsense is all coming from you. Computer? Right they use home PCs as their servers.


Yes and FBI is reading you mind... Do you wear an alluminium hat :)


As usual nothing more than a load crock coming from someone with the mentality of a 16 year of schoolboy.

You talk about yourself:)

I like what I trade, I trade what I like
togr

Mitglied seit Feb 22, 2011  3969 Beiträge vontogr (togr) Dec 15 2014 at 12:19
Furax posted:
It is possible as you can see here :

https://www.forexagone.com/forum/questions-debutants/comment-trader-si-l-on-a-peu-de-temps-9944?p=4#posts



@Furax
I saw someone else comment something like
MFB is especially designed to upload statements and create account profile.
Uploading pictures is close to worthless.

I like what I trade, I trade what I like
Furax

Mitglied seit Oct 28, 2010  92 Beiträge Furax Dec 15 2014 at 12:22
togr posted:
Furax posted:
It is possible as you can see here :

https://www.forexagone.com/forum/questions-debutants/comment-trader-si-l-on-a-peu-de-temps-9944?p=4#posts



@Furax
I saw someone else comment something like
MFB is especially designed to upload statements and create account profile.
Uploading pictures is close to worthless.


That's why you have the link to learn the method :

https://www.forexagone.com/forum/questions-debutants/comment-trader-si-l-on-a-peu-de-temps-9944?p=4#posts

On entend l'arbre qui tombe mais pas la forêt qui pousse...
togr

Mitglied seit Feb 22, 2011  3969 Beiträge vontogr (togr) Dec 15 2014 at 12:24
Furax posted:
togr posted:
Furax posted:
It is possible as you can see here :

https://www.forexagone.com/forum/questions-debutants/comment-trader-si-l-on-a-peu-de-temps-9944?p=4#posts



@Furax
I saw someone else comment something like
MFB is especially designed to upload statements and create account profile.
Uploading pictures is close to worthless.


That's why you have the link to learn the method :

https://www.forexagone.com/forum/questions-debutants/comment-trader-si-l-on-a-peu-de-temps-9944?p=4#posts

Well this topis is about performance. If you have account with such performance then post a MFB link.

I like what I trade, I trade what I like
Furax

Mitglied seit Oct 28, 2010  92 Beiträge Furax Dec 15 2014 at 12:28
This copie is about a method, not a performance... so let's learn by yourself because nobody can do it for you.
Personnaly, I prefer my EA.

On entend l'arbre qui tombe mais pas la forêt qui pousse...
MyFxTrader

Mitglied seit Dec 31, 2013  170 Beiträge MyFxTrader Dec 15 2014 at 12:31
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
togr posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
MyFxTrader posted:
BluePanther posted:
marran posted:
will you be releasing your EA to everyone?


I am surprised you think it is an EA. The first conclusion most people say is: 'this is only possible with manual trading. There is no such thing as a Holy Grail EA.'

But if it works manually, why would it not work automatically? Bad programming? Or fundamental analysis (lack of)?


EA is predictable. Metaquotes has ability to read the codes once the EA is running. They know exactly what the EA will do. Thus, broker is always ahead of EA. Manual trading is less predictable.


Thank you for your input. So you are saying that MQL5 (developer of MT4) receives all the information from every / any MT4, and then colludes with the broker to work against the trader using an EA? There are a lot of MT4 accounts with hundreds of brokers, with thousands of EAs out there, all doing different things when the market moves on different instruments (forex, indexes, stocks)...

Can you provide some evidence to backup your knowledge? How do you know this? MQL5 must have an awfully big task being Big Brother! eek


If MetaTrader could cope with the tens of thousands of transactions across a wide latitude of instruments simultaneously with ease, there's no reason to think that to deal with every single trade individually is too big a task for them and is beyond their means. Many forums have brought into light regarding the MetaTrader individual 'plugin' which makes life difficult for traders.

By coding a system into an EA and then running it on the chart, we effectively revealed the blueprint of entire trading system to the broker. Even though we coded the EA, the fact remains that both the Metatrader & the MQL are proprietary of MetaQuotes. They are the boss. We are merely playing at their tuft. And to reveal our every move to them in the form of an EA makes matter worse.

What I'm saying is it easy for them to manipulated the feed if they choose to and whenever the opportunity is presented to them with this individual 'plugin' to mitigate an EA from making profits as they already know all the moves in advance. Manual trading on the other hand suffers no such deficiency. That's why a successful manual system very often become less profitable once it's running on an EA. But of course there is only so much they can do because there is definitely a threshold on how much the feed can be manipulated.


That's pure nonsense. The computing power needed would be beyond capacity of any computer. Moreover they have much simpler tools like the plugin you mentioned.


The nonsense is all coming from you. Computer? Right they use home PCs as their servers.


Yes and FBI is reading you mind... Do you wear an alluminium hat :)


As usual nothing more than a load crock coming from someone with the mentality of a 16 year of schoolboy.

You talk about yourself:)


Another glaring example that attest to my claims. I'm done wasting my time here responding to a juvenile.

Opinions are like butt-holes; everybody has one and it usually stinks.
Zurück 1 .. 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 .. 55 Nächste
Net Long-Term TIC Flows (3h 0min)
EUR/USD stays neutral, attention to 1.16...(8h 35min ago)
EURUSD 1.15838 GBPUSD 1.31857
USDJPY 112.161 USDCAD 1.29231

Werkzeuge

Gemeinschaft

Beiträge

Broker

Plattform

Unterstützung


Twitter |  Facebook |  Seitenübersicht  |  Bedingungen  |   Datenschutzbestimmungen
©2018 Myfxbook Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
HIGH RISK WARNING: Foreign exchange trading carries a high level of risk that may not be suitable for all investors. Leverage creates additional risk and loss exposure. Before you decide to trade foreign exchange, carefully consider your investment objectives, experience level, and risk tolerance. You could lose some or all of your initial investment; do not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. Educate yourself on the risks associated with foreign exchange trading, and seek advice from an independent financial or tax advisor if you have any questions. Any data and information is provided 'as is' solely for informational purposes, and is not intended for trading purposes or advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.