FXStabilizer - Turbo_OldUpdateMethod (by fx_skill)
Der Benutzer hat seinen Strategiestatus auf Privat geändert
FXStabilizer - Turbo_OldUpdateMethod Diskussion
FIRMANSYAH UTAMA
(futama99)
Mitglied seit Oct 14, 2011
25 Beiträge
Dec 15 2016 at 07:27
No trading in December?
fx_skill
Mitglied seit May 03, 2012
57 Beiträge
Dec 15 2016 at 19:49
futama99 posted:
No trading in December?
Hi! It's just monitoring stuck. Already updated
support@
husar2008
Mitglied seit Aug 09, 2014
26 Beiträge
Apr 27 2017 at 19:09
Why is the monitoring off ?
fx_skill
Mitglied seit May 03, 2012
57 Beiträge
Aug 24 2017 at 22:25
Hello dear friends! Because of old updating method at this account (page), we can't fully verified it at myfxbook. That is why we added it with new method updating and it fully verified already. We don't want to close this old one, because all conversation is here, but we can't guaranty that this account will be updating correctly all the time.
Actual and main monitoring of account is here:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx_skill/fxstabilizer-aud-turbo/2126989
Actual and main monitoring of account is here:
https://www.myfxbook.com/members/fx_skill/fxstabilizer-aud-turbo/2126989
support@
Drolph
Mitglied seit Dec 21, 2015
28 Beiträge
Sep 03 2017 at 14:57
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately. Instead you have been damn lucky.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
cc997
Mitglied seit Apr 17, 2017
2 Beiträge
Oct 09 2017 at 06:29
Is anyone buying this EA? Is it running the same as the author?
cc997
Mitglied seit Apr 17, 2017
2 Beiträge
Oct 09 2017 at 06:30
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance. Is there cheating? Please explain
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance. Is there cheating? Please explain
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you
fx_skill
Mitglied seit May 03, 2012
57 Beiträge
Oct 10 2017 at 12:32
Drolph posted:
I wonder, why you did not increase the risk after the first emergency stop in July this time like in all the other cases before? By this the account would have been gone with the second stop right afterwards unfortunately. Instead you have been damn lucky.
I know it is a high risk approach here in this public account, but the logic is irritating in this circumstance.
Can you elaborate on that? Thank you for the insight.
Hello!
Yes this account is rather risky, that is why we increase lotsize after loss. You are right, we didn't increase lotsize for next trades after loss, the reason of that is very funny. We just did not have time to raise the risk, because next trades began almost instantly after first loss 😄 Screenshot is attached
But as you can see even double loss was recovered by system for a little more than a month.
support@
Um Kommentare abgeben zu können müssen Sie sich einloggen.