Para utilizar el chat, inicie sesión.

Is it possible to get 30% profit every month?

IXBONE
Aug 25 2015 at 06:05
posts 97
platin posted:
IXBONE posted:
lol you made my day ;)
-i wrote: 'Using SL is almost the hard way to realize losses' NOT 'using SL is the harder way to trade' - complete different!
-you critcize others
-5 sentences later you confirm psych problems
...many letters wasted


i am happy that you enjoyed my post ;)

what have my problems to do with criticizing? if you following your logic than you couldn't discuss here because you even have a trackrecord to prove you thoughts ;). Arguing with arguments is the way how adults exchange their points of view, nothing wrong with that. As i wrote i am interested from which point of view you are talking.

Knowing the own weaknes is the first step of improvement. Learn from the succsessful not from the ignorant :)

nothing wasted here, its public discussion here others can build their opinions on.

greetings


-funny! i do not sell any system, so i must NOT have a track record!
-successful traders have open minds to integrate new trading technics-only the 'old school' sl only guys will loose in the long!!! run.
-fyi: i trade pure pa since 15 years, no indicators, no lines, nothing- OHLC only!, I was a inflexible SL guy till 2008 too, all my yearly profit was lost in 1 minute. Since i do not use sl anymore only other technics like async hedges, percentage allocations, brownian motion, stochatic processes (financial mathematics) and so on and yes i use different versions of martingale like open, stretched, double stretched, 1-3-2-4 with success too.

cheers

ps: using sl is not the one and only way to manage orders with negative profit, there are many other 'soft' ways to recover open negative trades, using sl is the hard way and realize the loss!

Marty270472 (Marty270472)
Aug 25 2015 at 06:47
posts 19
30 posts over the last weeks, 30 trader says 30% is no problem.
30 traders with a 99% dd. crazy

Alex
Look009
Aug 25 2015 at 07:18
posts 224
Academic studies may be good in quantum mechanics but not FX

Tomas Rodriguez Doherty
tommy2308
Aug 25 2015 at 07:20
posts 88
please do not fight, it is not right to fight when we are here to give our point of view and share ideas, some people have a hard time handling their nerves when there is no SL, so that must be respected. I put SL, just in case, but I analize and usually see if a trade does not have chances of pulling back, depends on level of risk, lets say lots ratio versus equity, in example, today you might buy eurusd and for sure if was going up, but you might have a low drawdown, but you could guess the price would eventually go up, so if yopu set a 20 pips SL you might lose a 150-200 pips of profit. It makes more sense to place SL on resuistance an support levels with a bit of margin, that to set a fixed SL or TP, trail stop ruins some operations too. It is about each person individually finding their comfort zone within risk.

Tomas Rodriguez Doherty
tommy2308
Aug 25 2015 at 07:20
posts 88
my trading style is to wait for trends in the H4 chart then go to the M1 and watch the indicators and price then, if the trend was bullish in the H4 chart I buy when the price is low on the M1 chart. Indicators ADX, RSI(14) RSI(6), CCI(14) CCI(6). with that is working for me. SL an TP are in my mind, no trailing Stop, and I go for a 5 % daily Gain. I check for reversal level for setting SL and closing bad trades. And for calculating risk, If the price is ranging in the H4 chart I look for another Symbol.

WU LIUH JING (StingRay)
Aug 25 2015 at 07:40
posts 21
My hand make EA make 80% yesterday. 64 000 profit pip, lot size 0.01 and rank 4th total trade(2851) in running contest

https://www.myfxbook.com/members/StingRay/contest-stingray/1335267

financial freedom by using own hand make EA.
IXBONE
Aug 25 2015 at 07:41
posts 97
Look009 posted:
Academic studies may be good in quantum mechanics but not FX

made my day ;)
Do you have read the study? If yes, copy and paste the authors conclusio, so we can prove you have read the study.
If not, you should not talk about academic studies you have NOT read!
And financial mathematics also learned at universities! Therfor academic studies are right on

Alex
Look009
Aug 27 2015 at 06:27
posts 224
IXBONE posted:
Look009 posted:
Academic studies may be good in quantum mechanics but not FX

made my day ;)
Do you have read the study? If yes, copy and paste the authors conclusio, so we can prove you have read the study.
If not, you should not talk about academic studies you have NOT read!
And financial mathematics also learned at universities! Therfor academic studies are right on


Common boy, I have a Phd in Math and I know that's I am speaking about

IXBONE
Aug 27 2015 at 07:31
posts 97
Look009 posted:
IXBONE posted:
Look009 posted:
Academic studies may be good in quantum mechanics but not FX

made my day ;)
Do you have read the study? If yes, copy and paste the authors conclusio, so we can prove you have read the study.
If not, you should not talk about academic studies you have NOT read!
And financial mathematics also learned at universities! Therfor academic studies are right on


Common boy, I have a Phd in Math and I know that's I am speaking about


for sure, and now i trust you :)
to prove your statement that you have Phd Math: describe the Wiener process, this is easy for real math guys

platin
Aug 30 2015 at 14:19
posts 29
Marty270472 posted:
30 posts over the last weeks, 30 trader says 30% is no problem.
30 traders with a 99% dd. crazy


made my day :)

Por favor, inicie sesión para comentar .