채팅을 사용하려면 로그인하십시오.

ESMA and its implication

emotionaltrader
Aug 26 2018 at 11:24
게시물99
These new leverage restrictions being introduced by regulators all over the world USA, Japan and Europe since the Financial markets crashed in 2008 does not make sense. Firstly, it was not Joe Bloggs up the street who crashed the financial markets, secondly small retail traders do not have the funds to influence the behaviour in the financial markets.


Like I said in an earlier post it would make more sense to have leverage the other way around. The rich few trading at a lower leverage and small traders trading at a higher leverage as this would create STABILITY!!!


The rich few are allowed to get richer whilst the majority are restricted and then the Bank of England questions the impact of conglomerates like Amazon on innovation and risk taking. Without risk, without innovation we wouldn't be where we are now. Furthermore it makes sense to invest in future generations instead of overloading them with huge financial debt e.g. Student Loans. Invest in people and economies will see much greater reward, stifle innovation and risk and world economies will stop growing except of course for the few Elite!!!

vontogr (togr)
Aug 28 2018 at 08:57
게시물4862
emotionaltrader posted:
togr posted:
There will always be offshore brokers offering 1:500+ leverage.
Though the risk trading with them is much higher.
On the other hand I have good personal experience with tradersway

Not trading offshore, find it hard enough trusting the FCA and our brokers yet alone foreign regulators and their brokers.

Do it like me, diversify your investment a cross various brokers, system, pairs, platform. So any potential loss wontharm you too much.

vontogr (togr)
Aug 28 2018 at 08:57
게시물4862
I do not like low leverage, it is a limitation not a safe tool.
Though I have system that works with low leverage without single issue.

jamesgwyther
Aug 28 2018 at 12:06
게시물289
togr posted:
emotionaltrader posted:
togr posted:
There will always be offshore brokers offering 1:500+ leverage.
Though the risk trading with them is much higher.
On the other hand I have good personal experience with tradersway

Not trading offshore, find it hard enough trusting the FCA and our brokers yet alone foreign regulators and their brokers.

Do it like me, diversify your investment a cross various brokers, system, pairs, platform. So any potential loss wontharm you too much.


Which brokers do you use?
I like to do the same and have money in more than one.
I use JAFX and Hugosway currently.

Charles_F
Aug 29 2018 at 06:35
게시물38
togr posted:
I do not like low leverage, it is a limitation not a safe tool.
Though I have system that works with low leverage without single issue.



It's a pain indeed.

The bigger issue for EU traders using UK brokers is that in about 6 months the Brexit will become fact. And if you're using a broker located in the UK which has not opted in to open an office in a EU country - then you will be shown the door.

emotionaltrader
Aug 29 2018 at 06:58
게시물99
TRILLIONS of $'s exchanges hands in the financial markets daily and regulatory bodies in Japan, USA and in Europe are restricting entry to that market. How can these regulatory bodies justify restricting small retail traders from trading from having a share of that market and how can they justify keeping it in the hands of the few.

In 2008 following the financial markets collapse the world not only entered recession from which we are only starting to recover, but was also on the brink of depression. If these regulatory bodies are concerned about ECONOMIC STABILITY and STABILITY in the FINANCIAL MARKETS then restricting leverage for small retail traders is not the answer and they should be doing the opposite. Instead of restricting leverage for small retail traders they should be restricting leverage for the rich few and yet they have done the opposite. How can this make sense?


I honestly believe these regulatory bodies need to look again at their decisions and reverse them. Think about it somebody who is trading millions with higher leverage is more likely to withdraw their funds once they are in profit and it's these millions that move the markets.


ALL THESE REGULATORY BODIES HAVE MADE THE WRONG DECISION IN RESTRICTING LEVERAGE FOR SMALL RETAIL TRADERS!!!

PUNISHING SMALL RETAIL TRADERS IS NOT THE ANSWER!!!

emotionaltrader
Aug 29 2018 at 06:58
게시물99
It's not just in the financial markets that people are being hit, it's in education and it's also business startups on the internet. Financial regulators have restricted small traders by imposing lower leverages, Students have been restricted from entering further education by student loans instead of grants and now Google are restricting business start ups by making it more expensive to build a website.

It seems to me that everything is upside down. Instead of providing incentives to people they are withdrawing those incentives and making it harder for people to achieve their hopes and dreams. The likes of Amazon, Google and other conglomerates will go from strength to strength whilst the rest of us feed on bread crumbs.

emotionaltrader
Aug 29 2018 at 07:01
게시물99
Majority of trading in the financial markets is now done by High Frequency Trading (HFT)/Algorithms. All these restrictions being placed on people is because of automation and changes in technology e.g. robotics. This is why incentives are being removed and it's all being done slowly and underhandedly.

Some of these big conglomerates are richer than nations and they are monopolising everything!!!

jamesgwyther
Aug 29 2018 at 08:51
게시물289
emotionaltrader posted:
Majority of trading in the financial markets is now done by High Frequency Trading (HFT)/Algorithms. All these restrictions being placed on people is because of automation and changes in technology e.g. robotics. This is why incentives are being removed and it's all being done slowly and underhandedly.

Some of these big conglomerates are richer than nations and they are monopolising everything!!!


WHy the sad face?

emotionaltrader
Aug 29 2018 at 08:54
게시물99
Technology should be used to benefit mankind it should not be used against mankind. In other words technology shouldn't replace jobs that people are capable of doing themselves. Spending millions of $'s on technology to replace people and to save on costs is WRONG!!!


ESMA says it's protecting small retail traders when in fact all they have achieved is restrict our trading and keep it in the hands of the few. Furthermore they are endangering thousands if not millions of jobs by cosying up and siding with High Frequency Traders, algorithms and and the rich few!!!



에 댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.