To use chat, please login.
Back to contacts

SW VPS Review Scores


Overall Score: 2.7 / 5

Total Votes: 50
Ease of use
1
Pricing
1
Features
1
Customer Service
1
1 - Worst   5 - Best

SW VPS Discussion

Nimish (nimish)
Jun 17 2015 at 09:54
8 posts
i have also same probleam.

Nimish (nimish)
Jun 17 2015 at 09:54
8 posts
you can change your mt4 password.

QuantumLabs (VabRus)
Jun 17 2015 at 09:55
32 posts
nimish posted:
you can change your mt4 password.


yes bro thanks... that is excatly I am doing.

Nimish (nimish)
Jun 17 2015 at 09:57
8 posts
then your all ea auto stopped.

rob559
Jul 08 2015 at 15:43
1916 posts
been long time with them but could not loggin so looking for a better one,costumer support really bad

Feeko
Sep 18 2015 at 09:35
15 posts
When their machines are running well, these are excellent servers at a fairly low price. Some services might not cost much more, but only offer 1 or 2 cores - SWVPS offers 4 in their base packages (as i write).

For an EA that does intensive processsing, it's much better to have 4 cores. If there's not that much work it does, one or two cores might be fine.

The other thing i found with some other providers is that they don't have their machines strapped down to the bare minimum to save on memory and CPU. Some of them keep processes that don't seem to be necessary running, and also 'clog up' once you start running more EAs. On SWVPS, for example, you might run 4 EAs on a 2Mb plan, which uses on average about 5% of CPU. On other providers, in part maybe because they have less cores, although i think there are other reasons as well, your CPU use might be around the 90-100% mark, and the machines really slow down, possibly to a stop.

In these cases, it's no use if there's great support, the machines just can't handle it, yet cost about the same or more. In the meantime, you may end up trying to work out how to free up resources for your EAs instead of just setting them up to trade.

The one big drawback with SWVPS is their support. I've been using them for a few years, and for most of that time the response delay was one day. So i'd send in my response, and next day i'd get a reply. That wasn't the greatest customer service, but it was ok, and when they did contact you, they were normally helpful.

Starting this year, though, the service standard has really dropped. Whereas before i could depend on a reply next day, now i'll typically get a reply, but it could be days later. Not great if you're experiencing a real problem or don't know what to do about something.

But even though their support is poor, i'm sticking with them, since unless you pay significantly more, you often don't get machines that are ready to go for trading, use resources sparingly, have 4 CPUs and generally perform well.

If they managed to provide decent service as well, they'd be really hard to beat. As it is, their machines are hard to beat, if not the customer service.

rob559
Sep 19 2015 at 14:25
1916 posts
renewed with them cause giving a chance to the runner,you are right working fine at very low price

coldlech
Nov 12 2015 at 12:31
5 posts
Poor, freezes, no connections, still problems, not recommended.😂

rob559
Nov 12 2015 at 16:32
1916 posts
with them since 2 years ,except 1 problem last year running good since

agree that costumer service is poor

QuantumLabs (VabRus)
Mar 28 2016 at 00:18
32 posts
Today swvps was rebooted my vps without send me any mail.


I've lost enough money to suspend their services forever

Please login to comment.