FXCharger (by fxcharger)
获利: | +1912.72% |
资金回撤: | 57.29% |
点: | 1088.9 |
交易: | 564 |
成功: |
|
损失: |
|
类型: | 真实的 |
杠杆值: | - |
交易: | 自动的 |
|
FXCharger 讨论
rickyalpari_1
从……加入成为会员 Jun 30, 2011
53个发言
Feb 05 2020 at 14:17
mmm i think it is not clear what auto lot size parameter do.
With a balance of 1000 $ or € or other if i insert a fix lot and set auto lot size 'false' i can decide the first lot size and consequently the other, so
0.01 0.04 0.16 0.64.
With the same balance 1000 $ € or other with auto lot size parameter set to 'true' the first lot size is 0.02
so 0.02 0.08 0.32 1.28
For me is more risk / DD and also it could be ( but i would like to underline IT COULD BE ) more profitable
With a balance of 1000 $ or € or other if i insert a fix lot and set auto lot size 'false' i can decide the first lot size and consequently the other, so
0.01 0.04 0.16 0.64.
With the same balance 1000 $ € or other with auto lot size parameter set to 'true' the first lot size is 0.02
so 0.02 0.08 0.32 1.28
For me is more risk / DD and also it could be ( but i would like to underline IT COULD BE ) more profitable
dutchdevil posted:
Hi, so in my eyes you are actually lowering risk over time. If you compare to any other form of investing or speculating, you’ll see that normally monthly profits in $$ will increase as your balance increases. Which makes sense, as it’s similarly fair for someone that commits $1,000,000 to your EA should have a larger yield than someone that commits only $1,000 right? To align with this, most EAs calculate lotsize based on some formula that relates it to your balance and your risk setting. As in your EA, the lotsize stays the same and your balance increases in time, this inherently means that your risk is lowered over time.
Does the EA have an option to switch to such an automated lotsize calculation and if so, have you tested this long term?
Hello!
Well, it's all about how you look at it and what is convenient to you. Some traders like to reinvest their profit, some traders like to keep their profit and don't increase the risks (risks in money not in percents). We prefer to make trading more safe that is why we don't use compound interest (auto lot size calculation). Any trader makes this decision by himself.
But yes sure, our EA has the possibility to trade with 'automated lotsize calculation' and you are free to use it 😄
You are selling this EA, but you do not trust it so much.
This is why you are running your EA on a cent account. ( i have checked with fxopen)
Create a $10k standard account and let it work without disabling it in high impact news.
As a EA provider i run my EAs on my personal accounts with over $100K then i start promoting .
You are running it on a cent account , and you expect your clients to fully trust it.
This is why you are running your EA on a cent account. ( i have checked with fxopen)
Create a $10k standard account and let it work without disabling it in high impact news.
As a EA provider i run my EAs on my personal accounts with over $100K then i start promoting .
You are running it on a cent account , and you expect your clients to fully trust it.
almfx posted:
You are selling this EA, but you do not trust it so much.
This is why you are running your EA on a cent account. ( i have checked with fxopen)
Create a $10k standard account and let it work without disabling it in high impact news.
As a EA provider i run my EAs on my personal accounts with over $100K then i start promoting .
You are running it on a cent account , and you expect your clients to fully trust it.
And your fxbook accounts hide trade history.
Not trustworthy either.
MicF posted:almfx posted:
You are selling this EA, but you do not trust it so much.
This is why you are running your EA on a cent account. ( i have checked with fxopen)
Create a $10k standard account and let it work without disabling it in high impact news.
As a EA provider i run my EAs on my personal accounts with over $100K then i start promoting .
You are running it on a cent account , and you expect your clients to fully trust it.
And your fxbook accounts hide trade history.
Not trustworthy either.
Trade history is for checking the strategy,
For checking martingale, grid, there are other stuff that you can use , like summary , negative pips and earnings.
Not only martingale and grid.
I'd like to see, if the trades have SL and TP for instance.
I had several MT4 crashes and was super happy, that a SL saved my account.
But that's just one point.
I doubt people can to re-engineer your EA based on trading history.
I'd rather suspect, there is something hidden and I don't bother going deeper into my due diligence.
I'd like to see, if the trades have SL and TP for instance.
I had several MT4 crashes and was super happy, that a SL saved my account.
But that's just one point.
I doubt people can to re-engineer your EA based on trading history.
I'd rather suspect, there is something hidden and I don't bother going deeper into my due diligence.
Hello almfx,
Well, you have found a good idea how to advertise your EAs. You have come to one of the most popular EA monitoring and said that your robot is better 😁
Well, you have found a good idea how to advertise your EAs. You have come to one of the most popular EA monitoring and said that your robot is better 😁
almfx posted:MicF posted:
And your fxbook accounts hide trade history.
Not trustworthy either.
Trade history is for checking the strategy,
For checking martingale, grid, there are other stuff that you can use , like summary , negative pips and earnings.
Yeah, we know why you closed the history of trading... One account with 1% of drawdown and 140% of the profit. Another account with 6 pips averages for each trade - scalper that would work only with your 'very good' broker - Bwin Brokers. Another famous broker is Sentratama Investor... Where did you find that brokers?
I am using FXCharger from 2017 year. I have the same trades as the vendor's account. Yes, at 2018 year I have two stop losses (the same as vendor), but after each loss, I have increased a little bit risk and recover the losses quickly. There are not many EAs with which I pleased work, but this is one of them.