NextLevelForex trader's profile
名前 | NextLevelForex |
ビオ:
Traded stocks, options, indices, futures, forex, at first discretionary (2002); then changed to mechanical trading (2004). Being a software developer by passion and profession, I started coding strategies, and changed my trading style to automated (2009) and semi-automated (2011).
取引スタイル:
Semi-automated
モットー:
He who thinks he can, and he who thinks he cannot, are both right. ~ Henry Ford
経験豊富 | 5年以上 |
位置 |
保証 | 4 |
Apr 25, 2011 at 02:20 |
ブロックされているユーザー | 0 |
NextLevelForex feedの中
Oct 05, 2012 at 14:44
NextLevelForex feedの中
Jul 25, 2012 at 19:52
名前 | 増加 | ドローダウン | ピップス | 取引 | レバレッジ | タイプ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01A - S | 23.91% | 10.94% | 1367.3 | 自動 | 1:50 | リアル |
02A - A | 6.69% | 6.08% | 195.9 | 自動 | 1:50 | リアル |
03A - G | 74.71% | 19.43% | 2631.3 | 自動 | 1:50 | リアル |
04A - T | -10.97% | 13.08% | -823.7 | 自動 | 1:50 | リアル |
16 - SH client FxPrimus | -34.59% | 54.40% | -545492.3 | 手動 | 1:500 | リアル |
17 - WB client PepperS | -15.43% | 22.24% | -321.0 | 手動 | 1:400 | リアル |
23 - PF client FxPrimus | 14.57% | 37.80% | 1227.2 | 手動 | 1:500 | リアル |
24 - WB client PeppeR | -19.50% | 22.90% | 82.5 | 手動 | 1:400 | リアル |
Armada Exchange test | 116.00% | 11.65% | 235.6 | - | - | リアル |
Armada Exchange tst2 | 125.27% | 11.65% | 257.7 | - | - | リアル |
36 - ILQ.C - myfxpedia | -72.33% | 75.20% | -12316.8 | - | 1:50 | リアル |
VTI FX workshop | 15.48% | 4.30% | 1268.5 | - | 1:400 | デモ |
20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex tradersの中
Oct 03, 2013 at 02:33
20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex tradersの中
Sep 12, 2013 at 22:11
20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex tradersの中
Sep 11, 2013 at 16:45
20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex tradersの中
Sep 06, 2013 at 23:43
Having seen Fast Forex Millions fail on so many levels, I cleaned up my profile today, and removed all its demo accounts and backtests.
Do you have any ideas for why it's performance has been so different from any of your backtest?
That kind of discrepancy is almost always the result of over-optimization (a.k.a. curve-fitting). Of course the market can also have changed enough to no longer have any resemblance with the past, but given that all other systems I tested did much better than FFM, I vote with curve-fitting.
I just started a thread for the testing I did and will do with Fast Forex Millions:
http://static.mfbcdn.net/community/general/fast-forex-millions-back-forward/243865,1
http://static.mfbcdn.net/community/general/fast-forex-millions-back-forward/243865,1