Which first one are you talking about? Are you perhaps thinking of Forex Megadroid? They're totally unrelated. You can read my review at http://eareview.net/ for more info.

Actually, a part of that is my fault because I didn't notice the VM I was running it from stopped having internet access for about a week. Nevertheless, it's an EA that trades very rarely and I will update my review to make that more clear.

If I were you, instead of posting ironic comments I would rush and fix the... uhh... let's call it 'inaccuracy' on my website. I'm talking about the Alpari live account on your main page above which there's a banner saying 'initial balance $1000'.

If this message is your way to draw my attention to Primeval and you'd like me to review it, please feel free to just contact me via private message or directly via the contact form on my site. However, please keep in mind that I would rather not write a review if the performance Primeval exhibits in backtests prior to 2008-2009 is not up to par.

I'd send you the EA for you to review it but no, you're a professional cracker and it would be shared everywhere in forums again.

Thanks for the offer, maybe v2.1 you can review if you want and but not my latest update which will be available through Managed soon for loyal members.

Regards,

primevalea posted:
    The initial deposit of that demo account is truly $1,000 and right now the balance is $5,920.02 only that as you might know Alpari UK trims their demo statements and the initial deposit plus old trades simply disappear and once you want to re add the system to myfxbook it's not possible because the initial deposit is not seen so in this case mufxbook staff put manually a initial deposit of $3121.15 . This was their response:

'No, I cannot add a $1,000 deposit since there are no trades confirming the profit up to the balance of 3069.95. I've added a deposit in the sum of balance+profit = 3121.15.

Thanks,
Ethan,'


That's annoying. I didn't know about that issue. I thought it was started from something like 3k and it was an old banner or just a marketing scheme.

As for me being a professional cracker, that's not entirely true. I've openly admitted that I am quite proficient when it comes to reverse engineering, but I never was into the practice of sharing the EAs I review. Take Sir Lancelot for example, which I've written a review for almost one year ago: as far as I know that one was never shared; if it was, it was definitely not coming from me; it was given to me in full confidence and that was it. Take CashDNA as another example. As for 'professional', that implies making money from it, which I never did.

In fact, I recently changed the operational model of my site to affiliate-based and I'm currently striving to distance myself from the world of 'educated' EAs.

As for reviewing Primeval, now that you clarified the $1000 thing (I was going to contact you last month for a review on the suggestion of several of my readers but I noticed that detail and to be honest, I mistook it for marketing bs) I might be interested to do it and become an affiliate. I could of course get Primeval 2.1 from alternate sources, but I would rather not. If I'm going to write a review, I want to do it with your blessing. As for the new Primeval version, I wouldn't even want to review it if it's not available to the general public, just like I wouldn't want to review Hyper EA (which I am not sure why loulou69 brought up here) which might be a decent EA, but has already closed its gates to new customers.

Forex-Megabot ratio is 1:6 ..so this SL today is no problem Joke