Chart
Systems
| Name | Gain | Drawdown | Pips | Trading | Leverage | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01A - S | 23.91% | 10.94% | 1367.3 | Automated | 1:50 | Real |
| 02A - A | 6.69% | 6.08% | 195.9 | Automated | 1:50 | Real |
| 03A - G | 82.03% | 19.43% | 2805.4 | Automated | 1:50 | Real |
| 04A - T | -10.97% | 13.08% | -823.7 | Automated | 1:50 | Real |
| 16 - SH client FxPrimus | -34.59% | 54.40% | -545492.3 | Manual | 1:500 | Real |
| 17 - WB client PepperS | -15.43% | 22.24% | -321.0 | Manual | 1:400 | Real |
| 23 - PF client FxPrimus | 14.57% | 37.80% | 1227.2 | Manual | 1:500 | Real |
| 24 - WB client PeppeR | -19.50% | 22.90% | 82.5 | Manual | 1:400 | Real |
| Armada Exchange test | 116.00% | 11.65% | 235.6 | - | - | Real |
| Armada Exchange tst2 | 125.27% | 11.65% | 257.7 | - | - | Real |
NextLevelForex's Feed
| Subscribe to feed |
NextLevelForex
Having seen Fast Forex Millions fail on so many levels, I cleaned up my profile today, and removed all its demo accounts and backtests.
Having seen Fast Forex Millions fail on so many levels, I cleaned up my profile today, and removed all its demo accounts and backtests.
Jul 25 2012 at 19:52
SiriTrades
Do you have any ideas for why it's performance has been so different from any of your backtest?
Oct 05 2012 at 13:46
Oct 05 2012 at 13:46
NextLevelForex
That kind of discrepancy is almost always the result of over-optimization (a.k.a. curve-fitting). Of course the market can also have changed enough to no longer have any resemblance with the past, but given that all other systems I tested did much better than FFM, I vote with curve-fitting.
Oct 05 2012 at 14:44
Oct 05 2012 at 14:44
NextLevelForex
I just started a thread for the testing I did and will do with Fast Forex Millions:
http://www.myfxbook.com/community/general/fast-forex-millions-back-forward/243865,1
I just started a thread for the testing I did and will do with Fast Forex Millions:
http://www.myfxbook.com/community/general/fast-forex-millions-back-forward/243865,1
Jan 21 2012 at 09:42

Share
