SharePosts by Siitari
| Previous 1 2 3 4 5 .. 9 Next |
|
Like I said, YOU are a troll.
If you want to compare average win to something you should compare it to average loss. Which is in this case 2.7 pips or something like that. Biggest winning trade has been just over 100 pips.
So 100 pip win and a 330 SL. That would make the RR ~3:1. Not so poor anymore? Like you said, you need to know what to search...
EDIT: This system isn't just the numbers you see in there...
|
|
SOLAR, I really wouldn't talk trash with such account to show yourself. You are a true troll. Sadly you seem somewhat successful at it(trolling around).
|
|
[quote]aj90151 posted:
[quote]GridsForPips posted:
Isn't that just using "Custom analysis" and choose the magicnumbers you want?
Cheers
Soeren
[/quote]
No. I think he means combining several magics into one (group)...
[/quote]
I presume this was exactly what was intended in the first post and that's how I meant it too. So instead of several magic numbers you have them all in one group and this group acts like one magic number. And you could make many groups.
That would be neat for portfolio trading and/or for a system that uses many magic numbers.
You could for examp......
|
|
Bumb.
Grouping magic numbers would be a very good feature.
|
|
Added Indo Run 1.5 on GBPUSD M5.
|
|
Dropped Supreme Complexity(too unstable) and Automated Pips(doesn't really work with SL and doesn't seem to work without either). Still unsure whether I should put DestinyPro on...
There are some ATS orders still open to see if they come back into profit. I don't want to close them since there's still alot(!) of room for them to move(hoping for the trend to change at some point).
Added Blessing 3 to my portfolio with AUDNZD.
So now there is 16 charts open. 2 Crescendos, 1 B3, 6 XPAs, 2 EA BOSSs(TraXXon), 1 SteadyWinner and 4 EA Kains.
Crescendo and XPA are at 2% risk.
EA BOSS and EA Kain(......
|
|
:) Average win in pips is 5.08
Profit Factor tells something else than average win in pips. Profit factor = sum of all wins against sum of all loses. 1.9 isn't the best but it isn't bad either, atleast it's winning.
|
|
Glad to be of help and thanks for the quick replies and fixes.
|
|
Thanks for the explanation! I read the comments on your blog and the links too.
What is still confusing me is that the probability percent always seems to be 99.98%. On every system. There's a bug in the code? Or does it update at certain times only and gets calculated correctly later?
|
|
I'm a bit confused about this. I didn't know what this means and had to look it up.
Is '0.26 (99.98%)' as it's supposed to be? The percents seem to indicate that the 0.26 should actually be calculated as 1/n = 3.85?
Or have I misunderstood this completely? Has this been 'turned around' so that the smaller the number the better the expectancy?
I found this chart:
Z-Score & Confidence Limit (%)
3.00 / 99.73%
2.58 / 99.00%
2.33 / 98.00%
2.17 / 97.00%
2.05 / 96.00%
2.00 / 95.45%
1.96 / 95.00%
1.64 / 90.00%
EDIT: Seems that everyone has got a 99.98%?
|
