I've been using MDP from very early on, I've made plenty of money with it, as you can see on some of my public accounts. I witnessed MDP destroy one broker after another. Staff at the brokers admit that MDP is a huge burden which has completely changed their ability to execute efficiently during spikes. I'm sick of having this argument with people. Good luck.

[quote] FXPIG posted: [quote] SmoothHedge posted: I don't think anyone is going to be desperate to reverse engineer a system that maintains a floating drawdown of between 10 and 20% most of the time. There are plenty other martingale systems that are less risky. [/quote] The DOOR system is NOT using Martingale rules for ticket size. Our trade sizes are constant based on the overall size of the account in USD. As our average trade duration is less than 1 hour I am not sure how we can hold onto floating drawdowns 'most of the time'. Cheers, [/quote] That's even more strange. How ......

Is the news filter on?

[quote] jhenrikb posted: www.forexenvy.com Long cycles = positions that can close within the week or more. Short cycles = positions that can close within and hour or a day. This doesn't refer to long(Buy) and Short (Sell) [/quote] Thanks, I was asking if he is using both long and short cycle pairs, as it pertains to the Forex Envy system.

[quote] willgart posted: yes, but the documentation and the FFM team is clear: run the back test on YOUR account, not on somebody else results. each account will have different results and each account must be optimised individually. the birt's site didn't list the result of different filterdepth values and using different brokers. [/quote] The problem is the history data you use comes from Metaquotes or Dukascopy, not from your own broker.