crescendo (by crescendo) Estadísticas rápidas
Ganancia: +215.29%
Drawdown: 25.07%
Pips: 18127.7
Operaciones: 713
Ganadas:
Pérdida:
Tipo: Real
Apalancamiento: 1:500
Trading: Automatizado

Reporte completo

Página del usuario

Mensaje

Clasificación: Full Star Full Star Full Star Full Star Empty Star
crescendo Discusión
Anterior 1 2 3 4 Siguiente
profijet

Miembro desde Sep 10, 2009  134 mensajes profijet Sep 29 2010 at 11:13
Hello, can you confirm your user rights?

4xfreak

Miembro desde Feb 26, 2010  21 mensajes Dale (4xfreak) Sep 29 2010 at 19:33 (editado a las Sep 29 2010 at 19:42 )
I am assuming this is Mark's account - Can you verify your trading privileges and have this page update more often. I have purchased the EA and would like to get full verification from you on myfxbook and track it here instead of login with the investor password. It seems you have worked hard to eliminate the any skepticism the EA/robot market ( in general ) has had in the past - I congratulate you on that accomplishment!

***4xFreak***

stevetrade

Miembro desde Oct 28, 2009  1408 mensajes Steve B (stevetrade) Sep 29 2010 at 19:49 (editado a las Sep 29 2010 at 19:51 )
This account hasn't been updated since September 26th.

Attached an image of the open trades on this account at that date and the current state of affairs on Gbp/Jpy.

It's currently about an extra 640 pips in drawdown from what it is currently showing. Unless it's closed them for a loss.

There are some other posts on the site about Crescendo. You might want to go and read them.
Adjuntos:

11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
bestforexea

Miembro desde Oct 29, 2009  75 mensajes Casey Lim (bestforexea) Sep 30 2010 at 02:20
It's interesting how people are still so skeptical even when it is a real account.

Don't get me wrong... skepticism is great especially when it comes to buying digital products on the internet... Hell... Skepticism should be applied especially when buying digital products on the internet.

But for forex ea... where do we draw the line? If real account is not enough to prove some certain amount of credibility or trustworthiness... then where is the line?

Don't buy into forex ea at all? Or don't get involve in forex ea at all?

I am not backing this guy... But... I blogged about wanting to get involve with it because someone has the balls to put their money where their mouth is... but now I am having second thoughts because of the remarks that I have been reading. I think I should read the work 'remarks' as skepticism.

Oh well... trying to understand the mass psychological part of this would make me insane. So... I will just decide in due time if I will want to get involve with Crescendo...

NEVER say DIE!!!
4xfreak

Miembro desde Feb 26, 2010  21 mensajes Dale (4xfreak) Sep 30 2010 at 02:20
Steve, What do you mean 'There are some other posts on the site...' What site? I am testing the EA on a demo and wathcing the LIVE account here and on MT4stats.com. I would like to read the posts about this EA so please let me know which site you are refering to - Thanks
***Dale***

notzero

Miembro desde Sep 29, 2010  41 mensajes notzero Sep 30 2010 at 03:26
any person that has a profitab;le EA wou;ld never under any circumstances se;l;l it/.

if i own a goose that ;lays a one ounce go;lden egg per month, why wou;ld i se;l;l her?

obvious;ly, if i cou;ld cash out for the equiva;lent of many years of what i wou;ld make off of her eggs, then maybe i wou;ld take the money now and just get out/.

but the fx is not ;like the goose/.

with the fx, if you just feed her more $$ as in opm, she ;lays more eggs/.

nobody but nobody that has a viab;le EA wou;ld ever se;l;l it/.

i have been wrking on this project since 2004 and i may be now finished/.

i wou;ldnt se;l;l my code for a;l;l of the tea in china/.

current position: short eurgbp @ 8633

if i am right about this, i have found a hard bottom that when the price hits that ;leve;l, it aint going any further/.

and, i know the exact destination/target/.

good day gent;lemen and ;ladies,

zero/.


stevetrade

Miembro desde Oct 28, 2009  1408 mensajes Steve B (stevetrade) Sep 30 2010 at 07:30
Casey, my criticism comes from the fact that it uses a staking system that is dangerous.
Any EA that uses a staking plan that adds to a losing position is just waiting for a black swan event to come along and wipe the account.

Just like martingale EA's, these systems appear to have a nice steady upward equity curve that lures people in with the promise of a steady predictable return on their investment. However the problem is that all the equity drawdown gets saved up until the end when it sucks the account dry.

They also reinforce bad trading habits. If you get used to the idea that it's perfectly fine for your account to go into for example 50% drawdown while trading then you will accept that this is a reasonable way to trade. It isn't.

Now, it's perfectly possible that Andrea has managed to find a way to place the trades in such a way that over the last ten years his account has not blown but all that means is that he's managed to curve fit it to the Black Swan events that have already happened - and black swan events are by their very nature always different than the last one...


11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
averagejoe

Miembro desde Jan 18, 2010  63 mensajes averagejoe Oct 02 2010 at 15:19
But he is using a 30% DD SL exactly for the case of a 'black swan'.
So is not the case of the account blow up, else, is the case if the consistent profit overtime compensate an eventual 30% SL.

Succe55

Miembro desde Sep 29, 2010  40 mensajes Graham Archer (Succe55) Oct 03 2010 at 09:35 (editado a las Oct 03 2010 at 09:58 )
I have just posted my live account running Crescendo EA.

https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/crescendolive/52830

Lets see how it it goes :)

stevetrade

Miembro desde Oct 28, 2009  1408 mensajes Steve B (stevetrade) Oct 04 2010 at 11:35

averagejoe posted:
    But he is using a 30% DD SL exactly for the case of a 'black swan'.
So is not the case of the account blow up, else, is the case if the consistent profit overtime compensate an eventual 30% SL.


The question then I guess is how often a 30% drawdown would occur then

11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Anterior 1 2 3 4 Siguiente
Loading
Loading
EURUSD 1.18416 GBPUSD 1.29218
USDJPY 104.563 USDCAD 1.32031

Herramientas

Comunidad

Comentarios

Corredor

Plataforma

Soporte


Twitter |  Facebook |  Mapa del sitio  |  Términos  |   política de privacidad
©2020 Myfxbook Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
HIGH RISK WARNING: Foreign exchange trading carries a high level of risk that may not be suitable for all investors. Leverage creates additional risk and loss exposure. Before you decide to trade foreign exchange, carefully consider your investment objectives, experience level, and risk tolerance. You could lose some or all of your initial investment; do not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. Educate yourself on the risks associated with foreign exchange trading, and seek advice from an independent financial or tax advisor if you have any questions. Any data and information is provided 'as is' solely for informational purposes, and is not intended for trading purposes or advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.