NextLevelForex trader's profile
नाम | NextLevelForex |
बायो:
Traded stocks, options, indices, futures, forex, at first discretionary (2002); then changed to mechanical trading (2004). Being a software developer by passion and profession, I started coding strategies, and changed my trading style to automated (2009) and semi-automated (2011).
ट्रेड की तरीका:
Semi-automated
ऊदेश:
He who thinks he can, and he who thinks he cannot, are both right. ~ Henry Ford
अनुभव | 5 सालों से अधिक |
स्थान |
वाउचर | 4 |
पंजीकृत | Apr 25, 2011 at 02:20 |
उपभोगताओं को ब्लॉक कर दिया है | 0 |
अंदरNextLevelForex feed
Oct 05, 2012 at 14:44
अंदरNextLevelForex feed
Jul 25, 2012 at 19:52
नाम | लाभ | गिरावट | पीप्स | ट्रैडिंग | लीवरेज | प्रकार |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01A - S | 23.91% | 10.94% | 1367.3 | स्वचालित | 1:50 | असली |
02A - A | 6.69% | 6.08% | 195.9 | स्वचालित | 1:50 | असली |
03A - G | 74.71% | 19.43% | 2631.3 | स्वचालित | 1:50 | असली |
04A - T | -10.97% | 13.08% | -823.7 | स्वचालित | 1:50 | असली |
16 - SH client FxPrimus | -34.59% | 54.40% | -545492.3 | मैन्यूअल | 1:500 | असली |
17 - WB client PepperS | -15.43% | 22.24% | -321.0 | मैन्यूअल | 1:400 | असली |
23 - PF client FxPrimus | 14.57% | 37.80% | 1227.2 | मैन्यूअल | 1:500 | असली |
24 - WB client PeppeR | -19.50% | 22.90% | 82.5 | मैन्यूअल | 1:400 | असली |
Armada Exchange test | 116.00% | 11.65% | 235.6 | - | - | असली |
Armada Exchange tst2 | 125.27% | 11.65% | 257.7 | - | - | असली |
36 - ILQ.C - myfxpedia | -72.33% | 75.20% | -12316.8 | - | 1:50 | असली |
VTI FX workshop | 15.48% | 4.30% | 1268.5 | - | 1:400 | प्रदर्शन |
अंदर 20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex traders
Oct 03, 2013 at 02:33
अंदर 20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex traders
Sep 12, 2013 at 22:11
अंदर 20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex traders
Sep 11, 2013 at 16:45
अंदर 20-40% performance fee (with high watermark) for Forex traders
Sep 06, 2013 at 23:43
Having seen Fast Forex Millions fail on so many levels, I cleaned up my profile today, and removed all its demo accounts and backtests.
Do you have any ideas for why it's performance has been so different from any of your backtest?
That kind of discrepancy is almost always the result of over-optimization (a.k.a. curve-fitting). Of course the market can also have changed enough to no longer have any resemblance with the past, but given that all other systems I tested did much better than FFM, I vote with curve-fitting.
I just started a thread for the testing I did and will do with Fast Forex Millions:
http://static.mfbcdn.net/community/general/fast-forex-millions-back-forward/243865,1
http://static.mfbcdn.net/community/general/fast-forex-millions-back-forward/243865,1