Profit Greider (PAMM) (由 Silentspec)

收益: +206.18%
縮減 26.63%
點: 1437.9
交易 333
贏得:
損失:。
類型: 真實
杠杆率: 1:500
交易: 手動

Profit Greider (PAMM)討論

Sep 18, 2013 at 14:31
2,021流覽
35 Replies
會員從Mar 02, 2010開始   19帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 14:58
PAMM Account is liquidatet! Why and who did?
intinv@
會員從May 10, 2010開始   382帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 16:25
10.14.2013 17:04 Withdrawal -692448.20

Where is the money now?? 🙄
會員從Jun 28, 2010開始   64帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 16:25
Well ,

problem always appear when a system generates more than 100% monthly , at this stage you fall on the 'radar' of the
broker first ( a friend of mine works for a broker in Aussie land) , then the broker assign one of their agent to watch and
monitor the winning account permanently , with all the dirty plugs-in they already have with 'boston technologies' they launch
the full package ...and if they do not succed to stop the winning horse , well ,they start to have problem with their 'books'
thus with the LP ( Liquidity provider). For sure they received the call from the LP last friday ... .

Solution ?? Several PAMM`s in different brokers ...
會員從May 10, 2010開始   382帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 16:29
I agree, but its only a solution as long as the broker isn't a bucketshop like Alpari.
會員從Mar 02, 2010開始   19帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 16:33 (已編輯Oct 14, 2013 at 16:33)
at Oct. 10th Alpari published a restriction for PAMM. Maybe Dimitri did overlook this. https://alpari-forex.com/en/company/news/2013/10/10/14_10_pamm_terms_changes/
intinv@
會員從Mar 29, 2012開始   192帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 16:34
Don't be extreme guys, all brokers are not market maker, hence they don't care if you win or lose. All they want is volume and their LP to be happy.

I also heard about a stories like that sdek4x, that brokers 'check' accounts doing more than 100% monthly, which I can understand has its insane (from a rational investor point of view). I guess they check if everything is legit and especially if it doesn't smell like arbitrage.

Beside that, I don't think they could keep any money or do any dirty trick, especially to half a million account like this one.

I bet the trader used a lil tricky strategy or something on the 'limit' of the legality with Alpari...Let's hope he withdrew everything instead of the broker 'withdrawing him'.
A smooth sea never made a skillful sailor.
會員從May 10, 2010開始   382帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 16:55
medibkk posted:
at Oct. 10th Alpari published a restriction for PAMM. Maybe Dimitri did overlook this. https://alpari-forex.com/en/company/news/2013/10/10/14_10_pamm_terms_changes/

Im not surprised, its typical bucketshop restriction. Once alpari changed their leverage policy to get rid of the winning marty/ grid traders...
會員從Jun 18, 2011開始   6帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 18:14
Ликвидировано владельцем из-за изменений в торговых условиях.
會員從Oct 04, 2013開始   9帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 18:14
Same here just received an email...pamm account liquidated !! 😡
會員從Oct 04, 2013開始   9帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 18:15
PFewwww I received my money back though including the profit. I hope he opens another PAMM account though... 😳
會員從Mar 02, 2010開始   19帖子
Oct 14, 2013 at 18:19
People, such Broker has to be penalized! All 7oo Accounts shall be cancelled by users and take your money to another Broker. This is the only way to discipline Brokers!
intinv@
會員從Jun 10, 2012開始   36帖子
Oct 15, 2013 at 01:22
What in the hell happened here!? It seens that this was liquidated and distributed.
Buy Low...Sell High...Buy High...Sell Higher...Sell Low...Buy Lower !!!
RedRhino
forex_trader_149646
會員從Sep 09, 2013開始   471帖子
Oct 15, 2013 at 05:24
ForexPro posted:
medibkk posted:
at Oct. 10th Alpari published a restriction for PAMM. Maybe Dimitri did overlook this. https://alpari-forex.com/en/company/news/2013/10/10/14_10_pamm_terms_changes/

Im not surprised, its typical bucketshop restriction. Once alpari changed their leverage policy to get rid of the winning marty/ grid traders...

Starting on this date, PAMM Account managers with more than 100,000 USD / 70,000 EUR / 70,000 GLD in total equity on their account will no longer be able to trade with more than 1:100 leverage.

Source: alpari-forex.com, 'Oct. 14 – New Leverage Restriction for PAMM Managers'

The truth is Most LP do not offer High leverage - https://www.spotware.com/partners/liquidity-providers

Brokers normally have more capital ( excess ) than the margin needed to hold your positions on desk and this allows the broker to offer you massively high leverage.

It is also best for the broker because with high leverage, we can open Larger Lots, and the broker makes more money through commission this way.

會員從Jun 10, 2012開始   36帖子
Oct 15, 2013 at 05:46
Alpari was liquid enough to cover the forced distribution? I wonder if all other pamms were done like this.
Buy Low...Sell High...Buy High...Sell Higher...Sell Low...Buy Lower !!!
會員從May 24, 2010開始   371帖子
Oct 15, 2013 at 06:46
sdek4x posted:
Well ,

problem always appear when a system generates more than 100% monthly , at this stage you fall on the 'radar' of the
broker first ( a friend of mine works for a broker in Aussie land) , then the broker assign one of their agent to watch and
monitor the winning account permanently , with all the dirty plugs-in they already have with 'boston technologies' they launch
the full package ...and if they do not succed to stop the winning horse , well ,they start to have problem with their 'books'
thus with the LP ( Liquidity provider). For sure they received the call from the LP last friday ... .

Solution ?? Several PAMM`s in different brokers ...

I knew that this will happen because I did not go into PAMM. These are classic scams by brokers. This will do many broker. I've seen this in several reputable brokers.
會員從May 24, 2010開始   371帖子
Oct 15, 2013 at 06:49
EDFx1 posted:
Alpari was liquid enough to cover the forced distribution? I wonder if all other pamms were done like this.

All PAMM accounts are in order. Why? Because they do not make 100% per month. Broker was scared 😁
登錄 / 註冊 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。