Edit Your Comment
Best Broker?
Jan 14, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물541
Feb 04, 2010 at 07:55
(편집됨 Feb 04, 2010 at 07:57)
Jan 14, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물541
eforex posted:
What makes an broker from jsut being average to over the top great?
I would sum it up by importance:
1. Credebility
2. Customer service
3. Pricing
4. Trading Platform
This is only my opinion, so I'm sure others will feel differently. When I'm looking for a broker, first thing to do is some research about past experiences of other users, so definetly credebility is the most important. Then I need to check their customer service - I want quick and easy support process so I won't waste time/money when I don't need to.
Pricing is obviously important, but only after they passed my due diligence. Lastly, the trading platform which is not that important since all of the brokers use almost the same platforms - metatrader/act trader.
Jan 05, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물88
Feb 17, 2010 at 08:52
(편집됨 Feb 17, 2010 at 08:53)
Oct 25, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물80
sniperfx posted:
Here link for best broker that I used till now...fxprimus.com
😎
LOL! The user "sniperfx" was registered 18 minutes ago, and made this post 13 minutes ago.
Talk about being honest... 🙄
Whoever said money can't buy happiness didn't know where to shop.
Feb 20, 2010 at 09:00
Feb 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물8
eforex posted:
What makes an broker from jsut being average to over the top great?
I reg'd for your promotional acc of $25 sometime last year and on 11 Feb 2010 there was an adjustment transaction of $25 effected on the account which brought the acc bal from $107 to $87. Why is this?
Anyway, I am submitting this particular acc to myfxbook for monitoring.
Beneath the surface of impatient is anger
Mar 01, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물1
Mar 05, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물15
Oct 22, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물33
Apr 28, 2010 at 19:39
Oct 22, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물33
Forex.com UK for MT4 - http://openforexaccount.com

forex_trader_6207
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물55
May 05, 2010 at 11:52
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물55
Any Broker that only offers metatrader, is surely not worth using. I can already hear mql lovers screaming....
I've used FXCM- market scope for over 3 years. I am happy, But I have moved on to something much better.
My first broker was IBFX with metatrader and... what a joke!
I've tried Alpari uK, FXopen, Admiral markets, Broco, Tadawulfx, and others.... for mt4--- using fxcm uk mt4 for managed account and once agian metatrader is a JOKE for day trading....
I've used Oanda for 2 months. 4/5 .. spreads are crazy during lon/us
But I use Dukascopy for my personal accounts.
I've used FXCM- market scope for over 3 years. I am happy, But I have moved on to something much better.
My first broker was IBFX with metatrader and... what a joke!
I've tried Alpari uK, FXopen, Admiral markets, Broco, Tadawulfx, and others.... for mt4--- using fxcm uk mt4 for managed account and once agian metatrader is a JOKE for day trading....
I've used Oanda for 2 months. 4/5 .. spreads are crazy during lon/us
But I use Dukascopy for my personal accounts.
Sep 04, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물849

forex_trader_6207
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물55
May 06, 2010 at 00:14
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물55
MetaTrader is in Beta from Dukascopy. Dukascopy is offering Mt4 as a way to bring in more customers, as they have lowered their initial deposit to $5000 from $50,000 to offer their liquidity to retail traders.
Mt4 is the most popular retail platform, so offering MetaTrader is a marketing approach and does not mean anything else.
As I stated above.
ANY BROKER THAT ONLY OFFERS METATRADER is not worth using.......
Mt4 is the most popular retail platform, so offering MetaTrader is a marketing approach and does not mean anything else.
As I stated above.
ANY BROKER THAT ONLY OFFERS METATRADER is not worth using.......
Aug 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물131
May 06, 2010 at 02:36
Aug 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물131
pipinvestment0 posted:
MetaTrader is in Beta from Dukascopy. Dukascopy is offering Mt4 as a way to bring in more customers, as they have lowered their initial deposit to $5000 from $50,000 to offer their liquidity to retail traders.
Mt4 is the most popular retail platform, so offering MetaTrader is a marketing approach and does not mean anything else.
As I stated above.
ANY BROKER THAT ONLY OFFERS METATRADER is not worth using.......
Bull. Most MT4 brokers also provide other platforms too. (and a lot of them are worthless) - I've used both. My current broker only offers MT4 and I'm quite happy. I just left one that had multiple choices. Whether you offer MT4 singularly has no bearing on the quality of the broker. If a broker wants to scam you it doesnt matter if they have 10 other platforms if they're all crooked.
It ain't easy being Cheesy!

forex_trader_6207
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물55
May 06, 2010 at 05:43
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물55
"MOST" huh?
http://www.100forexbrokers.com/mt4forexbrokers
Most Brokers do not offer another trading platform.
OTHER platforms....Worthless for automation... Yes I agree... But for day trading... No....
I understand that all members on this site use Oanda or MetaTrader, and for the comments that I have made, Insults, arguments , bashing, etc was bound to happen. I was aware of this before stating the facts.
The truth is MQL is flawed from a programmers point of view. Argue all you want.
http://www.metaquotes.net/en/metatrader4/automated_trading
"Mql4 is Inferior to JAVA"
http://www.100forexbrokers.com/mt4forexbrokers
Most Brokers do not offer another trading platform.
OTHER platforms....Worthless for automation... Yes I agree... But for day trading... No....
I understand that all members on this site use Oanda or MetaTrader, and for the comments that I have made, Insults, arguments , bashing, etc was bound to happen. I was aware of this before stating the facts.
The truth is MQL is flawed from a programmers point of view. Argue all you want.
http://www.metaquotes.net/en/metatrader4/automated_trading
"Mql4 is Inferior to JAVA"
Aug 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물131
May 06, 2010 at 07:32
(편집됨 May 06, 2010 at 07:46)
Aug 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물131
MQL4 is just a programming language. Its no 'better' or 'worse' than the programmer that uses it. Of course the platform MT4 is flawed in a variety of ways (EA security being first in my mind) but MQL4 has opened up financial programming to thousands that never would have approached Ninja Trader or other automation systems.
In fact the C++, Java comparison was a compliment to the speed of MQL4. Its faster than the other financial programming languages and only lags dedicated languages built for speed. (games, mission critical real-time execution, etc.) MQL4 is built for ease of implementation and it succeeds wildly. If it was a speed contest I could say that EVERYTHING is slow compared to Machine Language but how easy it it to create strategies and make changes to ideas? The speed I care about is how fast I can implement my ideas. I can create trading programs faster in MQL4 than in almost any other language. THATS the speed I care about.
But I digress. I'll cut this short as I go to bed and let my MQL4 EA with my MT4 only broker make real money for me as I sleep on 100% autopilot. (what a pompous Jerk!) Zzzzzzz......
In fact the C++, Java comparison was a compliment to the speed of MQL4. Its faster than the other financial programming languages and only lags dedicated languages built for speed. (games, mission critical real-time execution, etc.) MQL4 is built for ease of implementation and it succeeds wildly. If it was a speed contest I could say that EVERYTHING is slow compared to Machine Language but how easy it it to create strategies and make changes to ideas? The speed I care about is how fast I can implement my ideas. I can create trading programs faster in MQL4 than in almost any other language. THATS the speed I care about.
But I digress. I'll cut this short as I go to bed and let my MQL4 EA with my MT4 only broker make real money for me as I sleep on 100% autopilot. (what a pompous Jerk!) Zzzzzzz......
It ain't easy being Cheesy!

*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.