Advertisement
Looking for Metatrader Backtesting Guru ( MT4)
Jan 30, 2015 at 18:24
726 개의 뷰
8 Replies
forex_trader_149646
Sep 09, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물406
Jan 30, 2015 at 18:24
I am building systems located here - http://www.myfxbook.com/members/RedRhinolab and I have a large list of systems that I'll be developing in 2015. I would like to meet someone who is a backtesting guru to optimize these systems. Quality backtests take a lot of time and resources. You will be rewarded by a free license of each system.
forex_trader_149646
Sep 09, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물406
Jan 30, 2015 at 18:32
Optimization through backtesting can "Open The Window" to a completely new system than the intended original design. For example, a system designed to run on a Daily Time frame can be ran on a H1 timeframe with different setting and produce far better results. The same goes for a system that was designed for a H1 TF can be implemented on a M5 TF with tighter SL,TP,TS to produce extraordinary results. Or you can optimize the original design to find better settings that actually change the system completely.
forex_trader_149646
Sep 09, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물406
Jan 30, 2015 at 18:40
Qualification:
Tick data - It's not necessary for 99% Modeling Quality unless optimizing trailing stops, but the tick data from a quality source "http://www.tickstory.com" or equivalent should be used to create M1 Bars that are then "Period Converter" to all the standard timeframes. By doing so, data holes don't exist and the backtester has the ability to work correctly. If there are better methods today, please discuss them as well.
Tick data - It's not necessary for 99% Modeling Quality unless optimizing trailing stops, but the tick data from a quality source "http://www.tickstory.com" or equivalent should be used to create M1 Bars that are then "Period Converter" to all the standard timeframes. By doing so, data holes don't exist and the backtester has the ability to work correctly. If there are better methods today, please discuss them as well.
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1601
Jan 30, 2015 at 20:14
There is noting better to test real demo account over months.
It takes time to test a strategy.
It takes time to test a strategy.
forex_trader_149646
Sep 09, 2013 부터 멤버
게시물406
Jan 31, 2015 at 06:24
Yes I agree, Live tests are better but the task is to unlock the potential of a system and through backtesting with optimization we can satisfy this task. It is truly amazing what we can uncover when backtesting, with a walk forward testing approach.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walk_forward_optimization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walk_forward_optimization
Nov 21, 2011 부터 멤버
게시물1601
Jan 31, 2015 at 10:27
In fact you simply need to know if your system was designed for trendy market or sideway market.
When you find or developp your own Indicator that can indicate such information, you allow your EA to trade or not.
If you think your strategy is suitable for any kind of market conditions, then you let it tun all time but you have different parameters to adjust.
When you find or developp your own Indicator that can indicate such information, you allow your EA to trade or not.
If you think your strategy is suitable for any kind of market conditions, then you let it tun all time but you have different parameters to adjust.
Aug 30, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물64
Jan 31, 2015 at 14:07
My System, can not be back tested, for a lot of reasons but one simple example is because its reading Internet News feeds like Reuters ....
LIKE MY TRADE ALERT POST! TRY IT FREE! NO SIGN UP! 100% FREE - w.w.w.ForexAlertSystem.c.o.m "CLICK ON BIG GREEN TRIAL BUTTON"
Jan 22, 2014 부터 멤버
게시물1
Feb 09, 2015 at 07:38
I'm interested in backtesting your systems. I use a customized backtesting engine built on a C++ framework that utilizes walk forward analysis. I also have access to high quality historical data.
Let me know if you're interested.
Let me know if you're interested.
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.
