Demo account trading is not a race. Take as much time as you need and carefully learn how to trade. Don't compare yourself with others, especially if they take less time than you. This is the lerning phase. The longer you spend here the clearer will be your basics. however, let me tell you that for advanced learning there is nothing better than live trading. So take you time on demo and when you have gained enough confidence and skills open live acc, preferably a micro a/c and start trading there.
oliviapeters posted: Demo account trading is not a race. Take as much time as you need and carefully learn how to trade. Don't compare yourself with others, especially if they take less time than you. This is the lerning phase. The longer you spend here the clearer will be your basics. however, let me tell you that for advanced learning there is nothing better than live trading. So take you time on demo and when you have gained enough confidence and skills open live acc, preferably a micro a/c and start trading there.
Hey olivia, in regard of your micro account recommendation: Yes the idea is good- with micro account the money value is smaller, so probably the looses will be smaller, but the profit will be smaller as well :) So if you don't have any aggressive money maker strategy- you can trade few months for 1-2 $ profit/lose :D Additionally, I noticed, that almost always the micro accounts are provided with worse conditions. Almost every broker providing micro account- the offered spreads are starting from 1 pip+... So generally, I think micro trading is wasting of time on bad conditions :) I prefer to trade on Interbank core spreads without markup... Comments and ideas are welcome :)
A lot of pro traders seem to do that but I find it difficult to calculate the commissions and know exactly how much it costs when I trade. I know that fixed spreads are usually bucket shops but it makes things easy for me
The commissions are important part of every system and strategy :) Lets say you are using an Expert Advisor on a commission based broker, providing interbank core spreads. The Take Profit of the EA will be activated early because of tight spread / or the Stop Loss will be activated bit later because of tight spread. Generally this could be helpful for the overall performance and more profitable. On the second scenario: you are trading on marked-up spreads, without commission. In such case, it could take more time to be activated the TP (because of wider spread) / or the SL can be activated early (because of wider spread). This could generate you bigger losses because of earlier activation of the SL and because of bigger chance to skip activation the TP.
chesterjohn posted: A year? Wow, that's a lot longer than I thought. I know I need longer to refine things and stop the stupid losses I keep making. I was thinking more like 3 months of continual profit combined with an improved win/loss ratio and I'd take the plunge.
If you've just started trading, totally new, and you have a perception that 3 months on demo is enough then you're in for a harsh and painful lesson. Trading profitably and consistently is just not that simple or easy. There are people who spend decades trying this - very smart people - who never succeed. You actually think that you are that one special, unique snowflake who can beat the markets when literally everyone else has tried and failed and had to try and try again? That's just not reality. The reality is that trading profitably over a long period is as close to impossible as you can get. There are far more successful neurosurgeons than there are successful traders. The churn rate at prop firms is astonishingly high, and this is where traders have the most advantageous circumstances, support and surroundings.
StampGer posted: very good point. I had not really thought about how the spread actually means that some trades that should be winners will actually be losers. nice comment
Yeah, the spread is one of most important things in regard of activation of your TP and SL. If you use an EA, the spread will be one of most important thing for the overall performance of the EA. As I mentioned on my previous post, if the spread is wider- the SL will be activated early / you will have a bigger chance to skip activating of the TP (because of the wider spread). This is why, my point is, that it is better to use interbank core spreads + commission, instead wider spreads without commission.
Oceanlif posted: I have been in demo for one year and I have just gotten some understanding of trading. And still learning more. Just stay consistent.
yeah consistency is paramount in trading. It is good that you spent such long on demo. Most people are on demo for 3-4 months only which, in my opinion at least, is a little short. Anyway, this long demo experience will be very helpful in understanding important aspects of trading
It depends on your effort. How much you put in time per day, per week, per month and what is the quality of that time you put in. Are you scrolling Facebook on one monitor and trying to trade on another or are you super focused? If the latter is the case, then 6 months of consistent profits on demo should be enough.
고위험 경고: 외환 거래는 모든 투자자에게 적합하지 않을 수 있는 높은 수준의 위험을 수반합니다.
레버리지는 추가적인 위험 및 손실 노출을 만듭니다. 외환 거래를 결정하기 전에 투자 목표, 경험 수준 및 위험 허용 오차를 신중하게 고려하십시오.
초기 투자의 일부 또는 전부를 잃을 수 있습니다. 잃을 여유가 없는 돈을 투자하지 마십시오. 외환 거래와 관련된 위험에 대해 스스로 교육하고 궁금한 점이 있으면 독립 금융 또는 세무사에게 조언을 구하십시오.
모든 데이터 및 정보는 정보 제공 목적으로만 있는 그대로 제공되며 거래 목적이나 조언을 위한 것이 아닙니다.
과거의 성과는 미래의 결과를 나타내는 것이 아닙니다.