a math related question.

people look for opportunities.

and then when they find that opportunity, they destroy it.

yes, i am talking about you, mr king.

i worked on this project with no reservations.

i had no interest in having any kind of a plan b.

no way.

no looking back.

second place is for btches, i say.

mr king,

i asked you to retrieve mr paton.

following is what you sent to him:

<img src=''>

and then you sent the above email to several of the other attorneys at his firm.

fyi, they dismissed your emails as spam.

for starters, i am not looking to do business with their firm.

i am, however, humbly seeking their assistance.

and then you come back and tell me phk paton?

what?

do you understand, michael, that i could very soon go from almost no income to probably five or six figures per week income?

obviously not.

i also asked you to retrieve mark.

and yet i do not see mark in front of me?

what gives?

did you not understand my meaning when i said that my trading group will be regarded as a trading mafia?

obviously not.

truth is, i really dont want mark back.

i will welcome him back with open arms if he steps up.

but i do not need him.

i told him in the beginning that i was going to take him to the top.

but, again, i do not need him.

i do have an ethical obligation to hold the door open.

my trading group is strong and we do not quit on anything or anybody.

omg, the man stole from me.

so, why would i ask him to come back?

cuz i know how big this thing is going to get.

and when he carries his punk azz in front of me and says that he owns part of what i have, oh boy..

everybody in these forums has seen where i have repeatedly asked for him..

i have posted his email and his phone number in this forum and at the oanda forum.

mark jackson: wasagolfer at gmail dot com

btw, i will meet with mr paton, or perhaps with one of the other fine legal professionals at his firm.

i am quite sure that we will have lunch.

probably in my hotel.

or on a nice boat.

i do hope that mr paton's firm is massively expensive.

i want expensive.

i insist on expensive.

a properly run trading group will require some really strong legal professionals to stand behind it.

even more than standing behind it, they will serve as the backbone of the group.

every last issue in my trading group will have every I dotted and every T crossed, properly.

not halfway.

not kinda.

not i think it might work.

not i hope it is ok.

not i think.

but instead...

right.

proper.

the best.

the cadillac.

period.

and when i request that one of my trading assistants fly to bumm phkd egypt and meet with an investor and that they have lunch with them and that they listen to them and find out what their investment goals are...

i want exactly that.

i do not expect you to call me and tell me that you dont think that we need to meet with this person.

i expect for you to have lunch and listen.

i expect for your every focus is to carry out the directive that i have handed to you.

and, yes, my trading assistants will carry concealed P38's.

i would really like if we could achieve ambassador status.

not bad for an eighth grader, huh?

i do have arbitrage, you do realize?

zero/.