Contest for REAL accounts 개의 투표 결과
Edit Your Comment
Contest for REAL accounts 토론

forex_trader_576
Sep 09, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물5
Aug 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물131
Aug 20, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물256
Mar 20, 2010 at 05:01
Aug 20, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물256
I think there should be a reasonable minimum, like $1000 to discourage the same reckless trading just because it is a $100 account.
For the demo accounts I would suggest that there be an approved list of brokers allowed, so we don't have the scam brokers with awesome demo accounts tainting the results.
For the demo accounts I would suggest that there be an approved list of brokers allowed, so we don't have the scam brokers with awesome demo accounts tainting the results.
Wealth Creation Through Technology
Aug 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물131
Mar 20, 2010 at 09:35
Aug 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물131
Real money will get real fills. I dont think the amount matters as much as the execution. Shoot for the moons and extreme scalpers will prob flame out just having to get real fills. I'd get a $100 account just to play with in a contest but 1K makes it too serious and kills the fun. Most real-money strategies are slow and cautious. I'd hope the contests would have more action than that.
It ain't easy being Cheesy!
Mar 20, 2010 at 11:57
Jul 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1418
Guys, we will definitely add real account contests if enough are interested - you know you always get your way 😄.
Obviously, no one will object to trade a demo account for a chance to win real money, so that's what we're starting with.
Syed, referring to your comment "Contest on demo accounts encourages reckless trading" - we do not completely agree with it; the contest will run over the course of 30 days, 1 account per user; with reckless trading a trader is more likely to wipe out his account before the end of the 30 day period, than to be at the top.
Obviously, no one will object to trade a demo account for a chance to win real money, so that's what we're starting with.
Syed, referring to your comment "Contest on demo accounts encourages reckless trading" - we do not completely agree with it; the contest will run over the course of 30 days, 1 account per user; with reckless trading a trader is more likely to wipe out his account before the end of the 30 day period, than to be at the top.
Dec 10, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물23
Mar 24, 2010 at 15:52
Dec 10, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물23
I totally agree with Syed, demo contests will only encourage the use of VERY unsound trading tactics which will be able to generate short term profitable results. For example, a trader may use a martingale system and get very profitable results for a few months which wouldn't be sustainable in live trading. You are also risking the issue of systems which CANNOT be traded in a live account but are EXTREMELY profitable in demo. For example, one could use off-quote 1 minute channel scalping, which is impossible to do in live testing due to requotes but generates HUGE amounts of money in demo accounts. These are very important issues, specially the last one which IS a very clear reality. Scalping systems ALWAYS overestimate (to a GREAT extent) profits in demo trading due to the fact that slippage, spread widening and requotes do not happen. There should be a minimum average profit per position (at least 5 times the spread eliminates these problems) on the contest rules to avoid these problems.
There are another ton of issues, related with what Syed mentioned. A person could put up a huge risk and multiply a demo account by 5, then stop trading and win the contest. The person could wipe the account 19 out of every 20 times but this person will win a contest eventually by doing this. Imagine if two people decided to cooperate, they could start the demo accounts, take huge risks on opposite directions with one of the two accounts doubling while the other gets wiped. This could lead to an account effectively winning through such a strategy.
I think that a demo contest encourages unsound trading tactics, risky trading and unrealistic expectations. Very strict rules like a minimum average profit and a minimum number of trades are required to prevent the most cheaty approaches but trading styles like Martingales, grid trading, etc (which are very unsound) will still be encouraged and rewarded, also giving people the dangerous impression that these trading styles can be long term profitable.
Just my grain of sand :o) Real 1000 USD account contests would be MUCH better ! Thank you for listening and for the great service you give to all of us ! :o)
There are another ton of issues, related with what Syed mentioned. A person could put up a huge risk and multiply a demo account by 5, then stop trading and win the contest. The person could wipe the account 19 out of every 20 times but this person will win a contest eventually by doing this. Imagine if two people decided to cooperate, they could start the demo accounts, take huge risks on opposite directions with one of the two accounts doubling while the other gets wiped. This could lead to an account effectively winning through such a strategy.
I think that a demo contest encourages unsound trading tactics, risky trading and unrealistic expectations. Very strict rules like a minimum average profit and a minimum number of trades are required to prevent the most cheaty approaches but trading styles like Martingales, grid trading, etc (which are very unsound) will still be encouraged and rewarded, also giving people the dangerous impression that these trading styles can be long term profitable.
Just my grain of sand :o) Real 1000 USD account contests would be MUCH better ! Thank you for listening and for the great service you give to all of us ! :o)

*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.