Advertisement
$$$ Manager (에 의해 fxveteran)
사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.
$$$ Manager 토론
Sep 04, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물849
Apr 13, 2010 at 22:16
Welcome in Las Vegas guys!
BTW Pheniox 500x600= 300K ...😉
BTW Pheniox 500x600= 300K ...😉
Feb 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물95
Apr 13, 2010 at 23:00
Definitely good on him to be able to trade so well and will be highly interesting to watch his performance. However, might be useful to take it with a pinch of salt. I don't want to be a Doubting Thomas but why not keep the track record verified at all times? Since this account appeared on the Systems page, it must have been verified at the start. But yet it's not now. (To be an a**hat, might this be so that a statement could be uploaded into mt4 between trading hours?)
And outright detractors, why not take a wait and see approach?
And outright detractors, why not take a wait and see approach?
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:33
Well my friend you heard the community..... My opinion is that base on naked eyes statistics, you are definitely doing something right... however if you truly want to be mentioned in the same brackets as some of the greats ( George Sorros, Buffets ecttt) you need to be lil more transparent as to what you are really doing. I mean I hope you didn't expect for people not to be skeptical because those are Beyon man imaginagion results ...Therefore I will conclude by saying this its either you ARE the holly grail or You are the best Con man I've ever come accross either or you are at the best of both extreme so I can respect that.
Don't miss the forest for a tree.
Feb 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물95
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:37
(편집됨 Apr 14, 2010 at 15:41)
Hang... on a second, it's starting to look a little crazy here. 3361% gain of starting equity in one day. At $10,000, that's $336,100 profit. In one day. Ye...ah.
Hide the trade history by all means but why not verifiy the track record?
Hide the trade history by all means but why not verifiy the track record?
Sep 04, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물849
Apr 14, 2010 at 15:42
(편집됨 Apr 14, 2010 at 15:50)
Acc. DD at 49% and since 7 hours not updated......😈
Why wasting time on verification when acc is already belly up? LOL
Why wasting time on verification when acc is already belly up? LOL
Dec 31, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물141
Apr 14, 2010 at 16:09
In my view, if you want people to trade with you, you should be fully transparent. Even then people will misunderstand the results but at least it's not your fault then...
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/tbuitendyk/volatility-trader-rel3c-live/21903
http://www.myfxbook.com/members/tbuitendyk/volatility-trader-rel3c-live/21903
Gear on the left...
Apr 14, 2010 at 17:21
Pheniox posted:
Lets see here.
LIve account - Real Money - not a demo. He does not ask that anyone do anything other than watch and see and so many critics.
Go figure.
Perhaps if it was a demo there would be room for critics here.
I do not know this trader ,but he has the , whatever, to put his money where his mouth is.
And as to running managed accounts, well he could wait a few years and make a million or so being quiet, or go public and make it faster.
Personally I do not believe that tomorrow is promised to anyone, so if he wants to open a business, and make more, faster, then all the more to him, and more pips perhaps tp those that put some trust forward.
Good luck with your venture and trading, and hope you not only make it to the top, but make millions doing it.
Pheniox
Currently eqity is ~49%.....
And Pheniox, we all know that it's a matter of simple choice to state that the account is live. But until I see all trades verified and also an withdrawal, as for me that's pure scam. ~12 000 pipsin 137 trades in 5 trading days mainly in one pair.... oh maaan.... that smells. That means that this EA is able to catch every move which is quite impossible.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
forex_trader_5776
Jan 17, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물140
Apr 14, 2010 at 18:03
Someone is playing a joke on us. Hackers?
NO frikin automated system can do this, not even if your name is Goldman Sachs and not in the market conditions we have seen the last few days.
On another note, technically 50% drawdown after 5000% profit still leaves you a nice profit
$100+5000%=$5100 /2 =$2550.
NO frikin automated system can do this, not even if your name is Goldman Sachs and not in the market conditions we have seen the last few days.
On another note, technically 50% drawdown after 5000% profit still leaves you a nice profit
$100+5000%=$5100 /2 =$2550.
Apr 14, 2010 at 18:47
Robert you really nailed it here..
I am sorry to say but myfxbook is not like the CIA or NSA when it comes to be hackersafe. Any real good hacker could come in and fudge the account and if not verified that is probably what happens.
I can more or less tell if a account is real and not fudge by watching it every day for a few days..
Happy trading
Randy
I am sorry to say but myfxbook is not like the CIA or NSA when it comes to be hackersafe. Any real good hacker could come in and fudge the account and if not verified that is probably what happens.
I can more or less tell if a account is real and not fudge by watching it every day for a few days..
Happy trading
Randy
Feb 25, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물95
Apr 15, 2010 at 00:00
Utterly convinced this is a 100% scam now. PM for details. For obvious reasons, I will only respond to those who have posted here already.
Apr 15, 2010 at 10:47
adryfx posted:
I don't understand why most of the top systems have to hide or lock some part of the statement ? What are they afraid of ?
Myfxbook was better when I first signed up. Now I'm considering withdrawing because seems to me there are too many "top systems" here, just like other signal service EA websites. And looks like people here generally aren't interested in a steady, consistent return anyway.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1409
Apr 15, 2010 at 12:39
cateful posted:
stevetrade posted:
Excellent performance, you can manage my money any day :)
I'm not sure if you mean it or not, but please, be cautious.
I was being slightly flippant, however the account hadn't made such preposterous returns at first.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
