Fast Forex Millions (에 의해 birt)

: 게인 -11.74%
드로다운 26.10%
핍스: 343.3
거래 1104
원 :
손실:
: 종류 리얼
레버리지: 1:100
거래 : 자동화

Fast Forex Millions 토론

Jan 20, 2012 at 18:10
8,135 개의 뷰
88 Replies
Oct 04, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물46
May 22, 2012 at 07:56
stoped using that
Jan 20, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물7
Jul 13, 2012 at 14:56
I threw $200 when I bought this EA and I can't get it back....
Jan 20, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물7
Jul 13, 2012 at 14:57
Support is not working ...
SanandaJmmanuel
forex_trader_59378
Jan 11, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물27
Jul 13, 2012 at 17:23 (편집됨 Jul 13, 2012 at 17:25)
EA are there to cheat people's money mainly, its all about marketing the product, if you cannot trade as fast as a robot like a scalper. scalper is also high frequency trading means higher change to lose money as well when you keep changing side. then its time to learn price action on daily chart.

Price action on daily chart often may have up to 75% hit rates of success.

Please learn that CHARTS on the backtest are total different from LIVE! results on backtest is of no use! Please learn that! if you want to try a ea, please do it live. and see its reaction, you also need to control the EA trading hours, especially during heavily volatility.

I did more than 50 Ea tests, and none can do well under LIVE, not even MDP can do well either, hitting stop loss non-stops. So, its very determined by the speed, broker and etc, as well as the live rate, requotes and slippage.

So some EA may work for someone, while suck on others.

I personally don't recommend buying ea online, since its all marketing a product and cheating money. EA must be customized, optimized.
Nov 18, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물18
Sep 04, 2012 at 20:48
There are a few commercial EAs whose real time execution comes very close to what you get from a back test and are truly profitable, but there are just a tiny number of them in the market and they are based on the nature of the pair traded, you still have to keep on optimizing them but they are proving to be resilient and produce a stable return.


FFM seems to have been taylor made to do well until Dec. 2011 and from that point it just crashed. There was no amount of optimizing that could revive it.


MDP was very profitable but it was an all out assault on the brokers so they reacted by widening the spread and delaying execution during spikes and in the end nobody could use it anymore, it became impossible to trade. Perhaps it would have been better for the author to keep it just to himself ad get a stable return over the years.

I hope that the seller will come up with an EA that we can really depend on.
stevewalker
forex_trader_79941
Jun 06, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물1439
Sep 04, 2012 at 21:10
Fact : extreemly curve fitting BT.
Matter : Fail on FT.

no surprise.

walker


Aug 26, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물166
Sep 18, 2012 at 14:15
stevewalker posted:
Fact : extreemly curve fitting BT.
Matter : Fail on FT.

Completely agree. Unfortunately, the backtest curve fitting did not become apparent until many months after the launch. I stopped the forward test as soon as I received compelling evidence about it.
stevewalker
forex_trader_79941
Jun 06, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물1439
Sep 18, 2012 at 14:33
😄
I am fan of your FT s.

keep up the good work.

good luck!

walker.

birt posted:
stevewalker posted:
Fact : extreemly curve fitting BT.
Matter : Fail on FT.

Completely agree. Unfortunately, the backtest curve fitting did not become apparent until many months after the launch. I stopped the forward test as soon as I received compelling evidence about it.
Aug 19, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물34
Dec 01, 2012 at 06:08 (편집됨 Dec 01, 2012 at 06:09)
u know an EA is crap if brit has given up!
Get Rich or Die Trying
로그인 / 가입하기 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.