채팅을 사용하려면 로그인하십시오.

FXCharger (에 의해 fxcharger )

: 게인 +1912.72%
드로다운 57.29%
핍스: 1088.9
거래 564
원 :
손실:
: 종류 리얼
레버리지: -
거래 : 자동화
fxcharger
May 31 2018 at 06:01
게시물73
MicF posted:
I see it happened!
Didn't notice it.

As said it crashed down the max. Risk setting which seem to was 20%.

Didn't crash my account, I've set it to 35%.
Thats what I said:
Decreasing this setting will increase the likelyhood to hit the stopp loss.

And as you can see the profits afterwards...
.. I'd bet the setting is now 100% again, to catch up the losses.

Hello. FXCharger works in that way, that at any specified risk it will have lotsize and stoploss that will give possibility to system to work right and have the same point of loss for 30% and for 100% risks. So your specified risk % doesn't effect on reliability of the system it effect only on amount of possibly loss money. You can easily check it at backtests with different risks - results will be the same.
fxcharger
May 31 2018 at 06:01
게시물73
The best thing in our loss, that nobody of our customers didn't get the same loss, but only us 😄. It's looks like was some issue at our broker side.
MicF
May 31 2018 at 09:55
게시물95
fxcharger posted:
 FXCharger works in that way, that at any specified risk it will have lotsize and stoploss that will give possibility to system to work right and have the same point of loss for 30% and for 100% risks. So your specified risk % doesn't effect on reliability of the system it effect only on amount of possibly loss money. You can easily check it at backtests with different risks - results will be the same.

I backtested that and with 20% I had more losses.
How come?
MicF
May 31 2018 at 10:02
게시물95
So we can co we can conclude that losess is a very rare thing for our system. And what is the chance that it will have second loss in near period? It's very and very small chance of that. This couple of months is the best moment to have larger risks and greater profitability.
2. Nobody like drawdowns and then recover the deposit for long time. But with our system risk of second loss is so very low, that we

That's obviously statistically not valid.
If you roll a dice and score a 6, the chance to get a 6 on the second roll is exactly the same like the first time, 1/6.
fxcharger
Jun 01 2018 at 08:09
게시물73
MicF posted:
fxcharger posted:
 FXCharger works in that way, that at any specified risk it will have lotsize and stoploss that will give possibility to system to work right and have the same point of loss for 30% and for 100% risks. So your specified risk % doesn't effect on reliability of the system it effect only on amount of possibly loss money. You can easily check it at backtests with different risks - results will be the same.

I backtested that and with 20% I had more losses.
How come?

Possibly you have too low deposit or leverage, that it why with lower risk, the leverage is enough. Anyway I suggest you to contact our support, they will help you to figure out everything!
fxcharger
Jun 01 2018 at 08:10
게시물73
MicF posted:
So we can co we can conclude that losess is a very rare thing for our system. And what is the chance that it will have second loss in near period? It's very and very small chance of that. This couple of months is the best moment to have larger risks and greater profitability.
2. Nobody like drawdowns and then recover the deposit for long time. But with our system risk of second loss is so very low, that we

That's obviously statistically not valid.
If you roll a dice and score a 6, the chance to get a 6 on the second roll is exactly the same like the first time, 1/6.

If you do not take into account all the factors, then you are right. But in our situation you need to take into account history. Simple example: What is the chance of eagle side of the coin, when you toss it? It's easy, the chance of each side is 50/50%. If we toss coin 100 times, approximately we will get 50 eagles and 50 tails. But if will be the situation, that we toss the coin 50 times, and get eagle side only 10 times and 40 times of another side of the coin. For the next 50 times of tosses, chance will be the same 50/50? Or we understand that now probability theory will 'try' to balance the scales of probability and next 50 times of tosses, will have approximately 40 eagles and 10 another side of coin.

This is a primitive (rough) example, but it shows approximately what I mean. There are many factors that make effect on probability. We can't get guaranty from probability, but we can get it on our side and use it.
I hope this is an interesting food for thoughts 😄
vontogr (togr)
Jun 03 2018 at 06:05
게시물4862
MicF posted:
So we can co we can conclude that losess is a very rare thing for our system. And what is the chance that it will have second loss in near period? It's very and very small chance of that. This couple of months is the best moment to have larger risks and greater profitability.
2. Nobody like drawdowns and then recover the deposit for long time. But with our system risk of second loss is so very low, that we

That's obviously statistically not valid.
If you roll a dice and score a 6, the chance to get a 6 on the second roll is exactly the same like the first time, 1/6.
Rolling a dice is simply random.
market does not move randomly.
So your example is not valid.
MicF
Jun 03 2018 at 09:52
게시물95
togr posted:
MicF posted:
So we can co we can conclude that losess is a very rare thing for our system. And what is the chance that it will have second loss in near period? It's very and very small chance of that. This couple of months is the best moment to have larger risks and greater profitability.
2. Nobody like drawdowns and then recover the deposit for long time. But with our system risk of second loss is so very low, that we

That's obviously statistically not valid.
If you roll a dice and score a 6, the chance to get a 6 on the second roll is exactly the same like the first time, 1/6.
Rolling a dice is simply random.
market does not move randomly.
So your example is not valid.


Haha, read the scientific works from Eugene Fama, Ken French, Robert Schiller!
Market movements are random and hence unpredictable.
vontogr (togr)
Jun 04 2018 at 10:50
게시물4862
MicF posted:
togr posted:
MicF posted:
So we can co we can conclude that losess is a very rare thing for our system. And what is the chance that it will have second loss in near period? It's very and very small chance of that. This couple of months is the best moment to have larger risks and greater profitability.
2. Nobody like drawdowns and then recover the deposit for long time. But with our system risk of second loss is so very low, that we

That's obviously statistically not valid.
If you roll a dice and score a 6, the chance to get a 6 on the second roll is exactly the same like the first time, 1/6.
Rolling a dice is simply random.
market does not move randomly.
So your example is not valid.


Haha, read the scientific works from Eugene Fama, Ken French, Robert Schiller!
Market movements are random and hence unpredictable.

In such case onone will make profit
fxcharger
Jun 04 2018 at 13:18
게시물73
togr posted:
MicF posted:
So we can co we can conclude that losess is a very rare thing for our system. And what is the chance that it will have second loss in near period? It's very and very small chance of that. This couple of months is the best moment to have larger risks and greater profitability.
2. Nobody like drawdowns and then recover the deposit for long time. But with our system risk of second loss is so very low, that we

That's obviously statistically not valid.
If you roll a dice and score a 6, the chance to get a 6 on the second roll is exactly the same like the first time, 1/6.
Rolling a dice is simply random.
market does not move randomly.
So your example is not valid.

I am working on developing and programming at Forex olmost 10 years and all this time it is my full time work. Believe me, it moves almost randomly. But if you know much things about pseudo-random, you know that there are exist ways to hack it. There are was period when smart people hack casino gaming machines and get much money form that. They just knows what pseudo-random algorithm was used at specific machine. In programming always use pseudo-random number.
I don't say that Forex use pseudo-random to generate quotes, I am sure not, or not always - nobody knows (almost 😄), but it is works for all as random, but someone knows how to get profit with this 'random' as it was with casino gaming machines.

It's very easy to checkout, I did it in my first year of working at Forex coding. Just make EA that opens trades randomly (buy or sell) without analising of market. Use the same stops for TP and SL, for example 100TP and 100SL. If you make the backtest for year or more, you will see, that you have about 50% of wining trades (it's usually a little bit lower then 50% because of spread).
The possibility of win is the same as loss (almost because of spread), and you get 50/50 chance of win. Does not look like my example with a coin? 😀

Guys, I don't deceive you, I just telling you things that I got with my huge experience at Forex and I am honest in it. Anyway, it's my view of Forex, but I have some proofs that it works so. All of you can have yours vision of Forex, but has you any proofs that it works so?
vontogr (togr)
Jun 04 2018 at 13:42
게시물4862
fxcharger posted:
togr posted:
MicF posted:
So we can co we can conclude that losess is a very rare thing for our system. And what is the chance that it will have second loss in near period? It's very and very small chance of that. This couple of months is the best moment to have larger risks and greater profitability.
2. Nobody like drawdowns and then recover the deposit for long time. But with our system risk of second loss is so very low, that we

That's obviously statistically not valid.
If you roll a dice and score a 6, the chance to get a 6 on the second roll is exactly the same like the first time, 1/6.
Rolling a dice is simply random.
market does not move randomly.
So your example is not valid.

I am working on developing and programming at Forex olmost 10 years and all this time it is my full time work. Believe me, it moves almost randomly. But if you know much things about pseudo-random, you know that there are exist ways to hack it. There are was period when smart people hack casino gaming machines and get much money form that. They just knows what pseudo-random algorithm was used at specific machine. In programming always use pseudo-random number.
I don't say that Forex use pseudo-random to generate quotes, I am sure not, or not always - nobody knows (almost 😄), but it is works for all as random, but someone knows how to get profit with this 'random' as it was with casino gaming machines.

It's very easy to checkout, I did it in my first year of working at Forex coding. Just make EA that opens trades randomly (buy or sell) without analising of market. Use the same stops for TP and SL, for example 100TP and 100SL. If you make the backtest for year or more, you will see, that you have about 50% of wining trades (it's usually a little bit lower then 50% because of spread).
The possibility of win is the same as loss (almost because of spread), and you get 50/50 chance of win. Does not look like my example with a coin? 😀

Guys, I don't deceive you, I just telling you things that I got with my huge experience at Forex and I am honest in it. Anyway, it's my view of Forex, but I have some proofs that it works so. All of you can have yours vision of Forex, but has you any proofs that it works so?

It is very easy when you do not understand why market is moving in some way you call it random.
It is the same when you were not able to explain the lightning you said it is curse of god :)
MicF
Jun 04 2018 at 13:52
게시물95
@fxcharger
Exactly, that's why I use this EA.
As I wrote a bit earlier, FXCharger doesn't try to 'outguess' the market, it uses a simple yet intelligent strategy to compensate on looses.
That's why my FXCharger doesn't do the same trades as anybody elses.
Hence I can have a drawback, where anybody else doesn't, and vice versa of course.

Markets move randomly Eugene Fama was awarded with a noble price because of that.

You need to find something, which doesn't try to predict the next candle.
Martingale is one of it.
I find it funny that those blaming martingale strategies try to predict the next candle.
Is like a flat earther trys to fly to the moon.

So clever strategy @fxcharger ;-)
MicF
Jun 04 2018 at 13:54
게시물95
togr posted:
It is very easy when you do not understand why market is moving in some way you call it random.
It is the same when you were not able to explain the lightning you said it is curse of god :)

Maybe, but current science knowledge is, they are random ;-)
It may turn out one day, that it's wrong, we'll see ;-)
fxcharger
Jun 04 2018 at 14:43
게시물73
togr posted:
fxcharger posted:
I am working on developing and programming at Forex olmost 10 years and all this time it is my full time work. Believe me, it moves almost randomly. But if you know much things about pseudo-random, you know that there are exist ways to hack it. There are was period when smart people hack casino gaming machines and get much money form that. They just knows what pseudo-random algorithm was used at specific machine. In programming always use pseudo-random number.
I don't say that Forex use pseudo-random to generate quotes, I am sure not, or not always - nobody knows (almost 😄), but it is works for all as random, but someone knows how to get profit with this 'random' as it was with casino gaming machines.

It's very easy to checkout, I did it in my first year of working at Forex coding. Just make EA that opens trades randomly (buy or sell) without analising of market. Use the same stops for TP and SL, for example 100TP and 100SL. If you make the backtest for year or more, you will see, that you have about 50% of wining trades (it's usually a little bit lower then 50% because of spread).
The possibility of win is the same as loss (almost because of spread), and you get 50/50 chance of win. Does not look like my example with a coin? 😀

Guys, I don't deceive you, I just telling you things that I got with my huge experience at Forex and I am honest in it. Anyway, it's my view of Forex, but I have some proofs that it works so. All of you can have yours vision of Forex, but has you any proofs that it works so?

It is very easy when you do not understand why market is moving in some way you call it random.
It is the same when you were not able to explain the lightning you said it is curse of god :)

I think you didn't read my post carefully. Try to do it once more 😄
'I don't say that Forex use pseudo-random to generate quotes, I am sure not, or not always - nobody knows' - I said that it is not random, but because of dozens of things that have affect on way of market it's like random for us and almost for everyone. Nobody can analise all things that affect on Forex.
I have told you experiment that prooves that it is look like random for everyone it's acts like a random.
fxcharger
Jun 04 2018 at 14:45
게시물73
MicF posted:
@fxcharger
Exactly, that's why I use this EA.
As I wrote a bit earlier, FXCharger doesn't try to 'outguess' the market, it uses a simple yet intelligent strategy to compensate on looses.
That's why my FXCharger doesn't do the same trades as anybody elses.
Hence I can have a drawback, where anybody else doesn't, and vice versa of course.

Markets move randomly Eugene Fama was awarded with a noble price because of that.

You need to find something, which doesn't try to predict the next candle.
Martingale is one of it.
I find it funny that those blaming martingale strategies try to predict the next candle.
Is like a flat earther trys to fly to the moon.

So clever strategy @fxcharger ;-)

Thanks for the nice words 😄
Stead (ramsey)
Jun 13 2018 at 06:14
게시물22
Hi MicF, do you have 'Opposite Signal' = true ? is this the normal way to run this robot? (always opens two opposite trades)

And how about the MA settings, author's default is the best? personally i would change but I'm leaving as is considering author should have tested to find default settings. I may run it another chart together with different MA.

What do you think?

By the way this is a good EA. Maybe slow for some. But it is a timed trader, i.e. not working 24 hours.

This guy who keep answering back making comments is getting really annoying.

best,

MicF posted:
For some reasons I can't upload an image, so here are the advanced options:

EA_Mode Auto Setting
Custom Mode not recommended

Lots_multiplier 1.5
TakeProfit 40
no_StopLoss False
Opposite_trade true
Max_orders 10
Start_hour 0
Start_Min 0
Open_anyway false
Inverted_Signal false
... and some MA settings


Stead (ramsey)
Jun 13 2018 at 06:15
게시물22
I see FXcharger is back here, thanks for excellent work and replies on here. Please give me advice what you think,
best,
MicF
Jun 13 2018 at 12:57
게시물95
I didn't change the default settings.
It opens two trades at the start, hitting one Take profit it waits a while, then opens another trade of the same direction with 4 time the lot size.
fxcharger
Aug 31 2018 at 16:52
게시물73
ramsey posted:
I see FXcharger is back here, thanks for excellent work and replies on here. Please give me advice what you think,
best,
Hello Stead! For some reason I didn't saw your comment. You have praised my work and I didn't wrote you back 😳 I am sorry!

We suggest to use default settings, to get the same good results as we have. But you can try to make your own profitable settings and test it at backtests and if results are good try to trade at demo or live.
sjkhaushu
Sep 02 2018 at 07:21
게시물143
I just wonder what will happen when this EA has 2 losses in a row like it had in May. It is going to happen at some point and it will need over 6 months to get back to equity highs, provided it doesnt have another loss during that recovery. There are better and safer strategies than this martigale crap. And people will again wonder how its possible that account blew up when that happens....
에 댓글을 달려면 로그인하십시오.