Inertia Trader (에 의해 babyjake1961 )
사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.
Edit Your Comment
Inertia Trader 토론
Mar 31, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물69
Mar 31, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물69
Mar 11, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물7
Sep 21, 2017 at 18:49
Sep 23, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물77
I had a good win with the trades from yesterday because I make sure to take profit when I'm in profit. Once I see the market forming a bottom, I close all or almost all the bot trades. Yes, I will miss some of the really large moves but I miss most of these moves where it was in profit and then moved out.
Choose a good reputation over great riches (PROVERBS 22:1)
Aug 13, 2017 부터 멤버
게시물7
Sep 24, 2017 at 06:28
Aug 13, 2017 부터 멤버
게시물7
I agree that the entries this EA provides is nothing short of impressive. World class indeed. However, it sometime gives up very good profits in the quest for more profits and ended up in the red. I would suggest that Mr Goldstein, the creator of this great EA to update this EA to allow users (with smaller risk appetite) an alternative option for a less aggressive Take-Profit strategy in order to secure more but smaller wins. In any case, I would certainly recommend the Inertia Trader.
Feb 25, 2017 부터 멤버
게시물28
Sep 24, 2017 at 13:46
Sep 23, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물77
Looking at the growth graph it looks like it's hitting support and poised for a big move up 😁
Seriously though, I do believe that the system is a good system. Just need to monitor a little, take profit when you have it, and it's great. The last trades with the eurusd sat there in profit for hours building a base of support around 1.1875 Yes, the bot should be able to take the profit on its own but if your running this system on real $, you need to know how it works take profit when it's on the table.
Side note, I do see a good short opportunity with the eurusd this week for a retracement...
Seriously though, I do believe that the system is a good system. Just need to monitor a little, take profit when you have it, and it's great. The last trades with the eurusd sat there in profit for hours building a base of support around 1.1875 Yes, the bot should be able to take the profit on its own but if your running this system on real $, you need to know how it works take profit when it's on the table.
Side note, I do see a good short opportunity with the eurusd this week for a retracement...
Choose a good reputation over great riches (PROVERBS 22:1)
Mar 31, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물69
Oct 17, 2017 at 10:34
Mar 31, 2016 부터 멤버
게시물69
However it might sound now, the EA is not failing. If you watch its backtests when they are running, you will see such drops are in fact very common, given the risk level and the leverage used. Something that has worked for years won't fail so easily no matter how random the Forex market is. As a matter of fact, the market's randomness is what ensures this strategy's success in the long run.
Oct 17, 2017 at 10:54
Aug 25, 2012 부터 멤버
게시물32
Yeah there's insufficient evidence to suggest that the EA is failing, it's just on very high leverage and doesn't have a smooth R^2 growth curve or Sharpe ratio. IF you look at the previous forward-test periods (May 2, 2016 to March 10, 2017) you would be saying the same thing.
- TimeWarp to 2030 AD -
Oct 17, 2017 at 14:38
Apr 14, 2015 부터 멤버
게시물22
I just finished the book fooled by randomness and I have to agreed jake is right. A 50% winrate is as random as it get. Smooth grow curve are for turkey, get fed all year just to die on thanks giving. If you want smooth growth curve, get a martingale bot, or ask me for one :).
I actually run test backtest inertia 15 mins from 2001-2017 oct at 0.20 lot, it has a relative drawdown of 83% somewhere in 2004. Eventually recover and making new high.
I actually run test backtest inertia 15 mins from 2001-2017 oct at 0.20 lot, it has a relative drawdown of 83% somewhere in 2004. Eventually recover and making new high.
phi.wkumarketing@
Feb 25, 2017 부터 멤버
게시물28

*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.