Newest 7 || Maximum risk ONLINE (에 의해 westernpips)

사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.

Newest 7 || Maximum risk ONLINE 토론

Apr 21, 2011 at 07:31
1,018 개의 뷰
7 Replies
Feb 21, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물12
Apr 23, 2011 at 14:40 (편집됨 Apr 23, 2011 at 14:41)
Официальный сайт системы Newest
https://westernpips.com/
Sep 12, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물313
Apr 23, 2011 at 17:20
sellers showed signs of scam:

1)web site showed demo accounts for display
2)small deposits and history hided
3)frequent change of brokers from 1 account to another
4)sellers commited brokers suspicious
5)sellers doesnt want to give investors password
6)I suspect this is same guy recently one of account history i pointed out showed discrpancy
Feb 21, 2011 부터 멤버   게시물12
Apr 24, 2011 at 03:14
ONLY REAL ACCOUNT !!!
Feb 16, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물1332
Apr 24, 2011 at 07:08 (편집됨 Apr 24, 2011 at 07:09)
westernpips posted:
    ONLY REAL ACCOUNT !!!

I cannot doubt it works but the question is FOR HOW LONG?
Here it worked for ONLY 3 DAYS with small account.

BEWARE GUYS, THIS SYSTEM WORKS WITH ONLY CERTAIN BROKERS(WHICH WESTERN PIPS WILL NOT ANNOUNCE TO THE BUYERS), FOR A LIMITED PERIOD OF TIME(USUALLY ONLY FEW DAYS), AND WITH A LIMITED AMMOUNT OF MONEY(IF THE ACCOUNT IS BIG YOU WILL BE DETECTED BY THE BROKER IN A MATTER OF FEW MINUTES).

So is it worth it to spend $3000?
My answer is no, not because it doesn't work but rather because it will not work long enough even to compensate the $3000 paid. It's arbitrage, and arbitrage is not favored by the brokers, especially the ones we need(bucket shops).
But if you still consider burning those hardly earned $3000 ASK YOURSELF A LOGICAL QUESTION: WHY THE HELL HE NEEDS TO SELL IT IF IT'S SOOOO GOOOOD.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
Feb 20, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물152
Apr 24, 2011 at 08:16
Another hidden broker. When are people going to get a clue and stop hiding their broker if they want to be taken seriously.

Guys, can we start a campaign for fxbook to not allow brokers to be hidden? Anyone with me on this one?

Best
A strategy must significantly profit in a 10 year backtest to have a chance in Live trading - Mine Does!
Nov 18, 2009 부터 멤버   게시물735
Apr 24, 2011 at 08:38
Yes Wayne, it's a good idea. If you'd put it in the 'Suggestion Box', I'd give it a 'yes'.

We could also have a <b>Margin call counter</b> - every time a user hides or deletes a previously public account, their personal counter would go up. I'm wondering how the serial account blower toplist would look like ... hmmm ... let me see the candidates ... 😁 OK I was only joking of course.

<quote=SunnyDays>
Guys, can we start a campaign for fxbook to not allow brokers to be hidden? Anyone with me on this one?
</quote>
Surround yourself with people whose eyes light up when they see you and who have no agenda for your reform.
Feb 20, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물152
Apr 24, 2011 at 08:44
Speki, I'm quite excited right now because I've been corresponding with Ethan of fxbook about this and he says they have been considering this idea for some time and to keep an eye out for this possible development.

I responded by saying i believe this would propel fxbook to a new level of respectability and integrity. A good business move no doubt.

Too many scammers can currently walk into this site and lure people into their immoral web (not to imply this at all about the system we are posting on. This may be a very valid system). Just a point in general

Cheers

A strategy must significantly profit in a 10 year backtest to have a chance in Live trading - Mine Does!
Feb 20, 2010 부터 멤버   게시물152
Apr 24, 2011 at 08:48
Solar, you sound like you know what's going on here. Sorry, i didn't read your post before my positing. I'm tired. I just saw another hidden broker and had my normal knee-jerk reaction.

Nite fellas
A strategy must significantly profit in a 10 year backtest to have a chance in Live trading - Mine Does!
로그인 / 가입하기 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.