Rich Owl 토론

Hello,

You can make a backtest since 1999? This is weak backtest for so expensive EA. PayPal is no refund!!!

That's incredible. This is the same vendor: https://fourx.me/

https://www.myfxbook.com/community/trading-systems/fourxme/190729, 1

https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/metatrader_expert_advisor/fourx_ea/real

The EA has big profits but eventually you will lose everything. Hands off this vendor.

That is one expensive EA. Yes, looks like it is from Fourx.me the one that failed and even the vendor has removed the live test from his sales site.

You guys are right. I couldn't remember that EA that failed a couple of months ago. I looked at the site and the way it traded and it reminded me of fourx.me .....and your right it is...its a recycled EA. It just has a new name.

Martingale. No SL=No account in no time.

Hi George.

The EA has very solid SL which is margin based and set in the external parameters of the EA.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks.

can you tell me what is the cost of this ea

😈 DD, account killer

Please let us know if you have any questions about the EA.

We are glad that our EA has been performing so greatly.

Website is no longer available, I guess they closed shop: https://fourx.me/

   richowl posted:
   Please let us know if you have any questions about the EA.

Hi Richowl, can you tell me about your EA Money management? $100 / 0.01 lot?
What's broker do you recommend?

   gusrix posted:
   

   richowl posted:
   Please let us know if you have any questions about the EA.

Hi Richowl, can you tell me about your EA Money management? $100 / 0.01 lot?
What's broker do you recommend?

Hi Gusrix,

Thanks for your interest.
We started the EA with 0.02 lot on a $100.00 micro account.
Later we decided to lower the risk and as a result the lot size is currently lower than what it could have been based on the initial settings.
We are not using the Money Management capability of the EA, yet the EA does have Money Management system.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks.

Be very careful of trade size vs account size with grid+martingale. For example, on Feb. 23 it was floating -4500 pips. That's roughly -$4500 at 0.1 pips on a U.S. account with 50:1 leverage. As I write this, it has 24 open trades totaling 0.72 lots floating -540 pips. That would be nearly -$3900 with U.S. leverage. I bought FourX.Me and the vendor was very unsupportive. That EA looked to perform a lot like this one and eventually blew their test account. Buyer beware.

   gwrigh posted:
   Be very careful of trade size vs account size with grid+martingale. For example, on Feb. 23 it was floating -4500 pips. That's roughly -$4500 at 0.1 pips on a U.S. account with 50:1 leverage. As I write this, it has 24 open trades totaling 0.72 lots floating -540 pips. That would be nearly -$3900 with U.S. leverage. I bought FourX.Me and the vendor was very unsupportive. That EA looked to perform a lot like this one and eventually blew their test account. Buyer beware.

This EA has nothing to do with Fourx.me.
We are very supportive for our clients and have a great service.
Yes, the EA has experienced drawdown but so does every EA. Yet the return has been so high which explains the excessive drawdown.
Further more, your comment is biased since you are a EA seller.

Let me know if you have any questions.

I am not an EA seller. I'm just a regular trader in Arizona, USA. How did you come up with that? I hope you are not FourX.me. Someone else on this discussion said that. Please prove you aren't.

I would be interested if you would explain how Rich Owl will avoid complete disaster. Is there a drawdown limit in the money management settings? -4500 pips is huge - what's to prevent -10000 pips and blown account? Thanks.

   gwrigh posted:
   I am not an EA seller. I'm just a regular trader in Arizona, USA. How did you come up with that? I hope you are not FourX.me. Someone else on this discussion said that. Please prove you aren't.

Sorry for mistake, I just figured you are not an EA seller. There was a confusion.