Advertisement
Tasukigap Strategy2 (에 의해 tasukigap)
사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.
Tasukigap Strategy2 토론
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1409
Nov 01, 2010 at 21:59
Classic martingale systems involve increasing your position size in the same direction, which I am against the concept of yes.
This EA doesn't do that, it takes hedge positions with increasing position sizes. It will be interesting to see how it works out.
This EA doesn't do that, it takes hedge positions with increasing position sizes. It will be interesting to see how it works out.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물38
Nov 02, 2010 at 08:15
T-Gap
Again, ea appears to be performing well. You may also want to add a trading time feature (Start/Stop) , if trade already in the cycle continue trading if outside of this time. Most of your drawdown will happen in ranging market, so may want to avoid Asian session trading. Also, have you tried using on other pairs. Recovery strategy with martingale seems sound, will only have to optimize as far as when to start recovery.
Again, ea appears to be performing well. You may also want to add a trading time feature (Start/Stop) , if trade already in the cycle continue trading if outside of this time. Most of your drawdown will happen in ranging market, so may want to avoid Asian session trading. Also, have you tried using on other pairs. Recovery strategy with martingale seems sound, will only have to optimize as far as when to start recovery.
Nov 02, 2010 at 09:13
junglist00 posted:
T-Gap
Again, ea appears to be performing well. You may also want to add a trading time feature (Start/Stop) , if trade already in the cycle continue trading if outside of this time. Most of your drawdown will happen in ranging market, so may want to avoid Asian session trading. Also, have you tried using on other pairs. Recovery strategy with martingale seems sound, will only have to optimize as far as when to start recovery.
yes, you set start trade and end trade. i will try it on other pair
thanks for your supported commend
thanks
Jan 27, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물38
Nov 02, 2010 at 10:51
looking at your statement ... if you trade outside 00:00 - 08:00 , you may reduce drawdown ... may not have as much profit though.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1409
Nov 02, 2010 at 10:59
Broker time.
I think to some extent leaving out these trade times is not that relevant. Yes, most of the trades that get opened at that time are ending in a loss but overall the strategy compensates later on with hedge trades for these. I guess the way to test is to exclude the times in the EA and run a backtest to see the result.
I think to some extent leaving out these trade times is not that relevant. Yes, most of the trades that get opened at that time are ending in a loss but overall the strategy compensates later on with hedge trades for these. I guess the way to test is to exclude the times in the EA and run a backtest to see the result.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Nov 02, 2010 at 11:04
stevetrade posted:
Broker time.
I think to some extent leaving out these trade times is not that relevant. Yes, most of the trades that get opened at that time are ending in a loss but overall the strategy compensates later on with hedge trades for these. I guess the way to test is to exclude the times in the EA and run a backtest to see the result.
yup,as you know the backtest is not relevant.EA will only take price history and many factor will affect the result if you tets it on live market. any way i will check the best time to trade ( will do it with backtest 1st)
anyways thanks for your supported commend
thanks
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물808
Nov 02, 2010 at 15:03
What broker you using ? As I see your history record open to Max 3.2 Lot, which is mostly impossible to open trade.
Stack up from 0.1 till 3.2 = 6.2 Lot. $1500 /$62 which give you free space of 24 pips only, it is impossible to open the 3.2 Lot.
Are this cents account ? What time frame did you use ?
Stack up from 0.1 till 3.2 = 6.2 Lot. $1500 /$62 which give you free space of 24 pips only, it is impossible to open the 3.2 Lot.
Are this cents account ? What time frame did you use ?
Information is Gold when come to organised.
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1409
Nov 02, 2010 at 15:07
The trades aren't all in the same direction so you aren't stacking the trades up.
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물808
Nov 02, 2010 at 15:48
(편집됨 Nov 02, 2010 at 15:49)
Even though, I have try run a back test using $3k in Alpari UK demo with the follow trend hedging logic; it only open till 1.6 Lot;
Then it said no free margin , I wonder any broker has even more high leverage ?
As mean that not every broker can use this EA rite? As I'm surprise whiy it open started lot with 0.1 but not 0.01.
Then it said no free margin , I wonder any broker has even more high leverage ?
As mean that not every broker can use this EA rite? As I'm surprise whiy it open started lot with 0.1 but not 0.01.
Information is Gold when come to organised.
Sep 04, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물849
Nov 02, 2010 at 15:56
Im pretty sure, with a initial capital of 1500 bucks the system will not survive a 10 year backtest with the given lot size setting, no matter what leverage is offered by the broker.
Anyway, I'm still waiting for the backtest showing up in the strategies section...😝
Anyway, I'm still waiting for the backtest showing up in the strategies section...😝
Nov 02, 2010 at 18:29
ForexSeeker posted:
What broker you using ? As I see your history record open to Max 3.2 Lot, which is mostly impossible to open trade.
Stack up from 0.1 till 3.2 = 6.2 Lot. $1500 /$62 which give you free space of 24 pips only, it is impossible to open the 3.2 Lot.
Are this cents account ? What time frame did you use ?
no.This is not cent accont.use M5
Apr 20, 2010 부터 멤버
게시물808
Nov 03, 2010 at 00:34
So in real account how much your client use ?
Also minimum $1500 and 0.1 Lot size ?
What leverage require ?
Also minimum $1500 and 0.1 Lot size ?
What leverage require ?
Information is Gold when come to organised.
Nov 03, 2010 at 08:05
(편집됨 Nov 03, 2010 at 08:05)
Just MHO here, this EA SHOULD NOT BE RAN with these risk settings in the real life. From what I've seen it will be perfect to use it with 0.01 start lots on an account bigger that 5000 with the highest leverage possible. As seen it's quite possible that it could enter into a deep doubling cycle and thus be very dangerous for your account. Of course it will not produce 100%+/month but rather less than 10%/month. Anyway, even 10% or less is perfect if you control the risk of blowing the account.
"In trading, winning is frequently a question of luck, but losing is always a matter of skill."
Nov 03, 2010 at 10:43
forexma posted:
Just MHO here, this EA SHOULD NOT BE RAN with these risk settings in the real life. From what I've seen it will be perfect to use it with 0.01 start lots on an account bigger that 5000 with the highest leverage possible. As seen it's quite possible that it could enter into a deep doubling cycle and thus be very dangerous for your account. Of course it will not produce 100%+/month but rather less than 10%/month. Anyway, even 10% or less is perfect if you control the risk of blowing the account.
you can adjust your risk level on ea properties
Oct 28, 2009 부터 멤버
게시물1409
Nov 03, 2010 at 10:51
OKay, so what risk setting is this account using?
What risk settings do you advise to your customer?
And finally, what percentage gain is achievable with your advised risk settings?
What risk settings do you advise to your customer?
And finally, what percentage gain is achievable with your advised risk settings?
11:15, restate my assumptions: 1. Mathematics is the language of nature. 2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. 3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
Nov 04, 2010 at 14:00
stevetrade posted:
OKay, so what risk setting is this account using?
What risk settings do you advise to your customer?
And finally, what percentage gain is achievable with your advised risk settings?
you will get set file.
you can adjust it if u want and u can put SL
thanks
