Toms EA-Risk=2, Testing started 02/28/2013 (에 의해 Anubis)

사용자가 이 시스템을 삭제했습니다.

Toms EA-Risk=2, Testing started 02/28/2013 토론

Feb 28, 2013 at 19:58
425 개의 뷰
1 Replies
Jul 20, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물87
Feb 28, 2013 at 21:01
Funny. when I see a system like 'Toms EA crash', and the leverage is 1:500, it's like, 'Gee--I wonder why!?!' Here's some tips on running this EA succesfully: The minimum funding for this EA is $750. Thats in the manual. Although leverage is not discussed in the manual, I don't know why anyone would leverage 1:500. Seriously? Also, the acct must be a MICRO acct. trading 0.01 lots. If your going to spend the time studying an EA, set it up on demo, as though setting it up on real, and use the same broker that your real acct is on, as this EA will act differently on different brokers. This acct is set up exactly as I would a live acct. Leverage=1:100, funding=750, risk=2. I've tested this EA on several demo accts, and it works just fine. I'm also testing it on a lower $500 acct, to see how it handles lower funding. A basket of negative positions is normal for this EA. I've seen 10 to 20% of the funds deposited being used on a basket. It holds the negative ones, while taking the positive profits, so funding is CRITICAL to avoid margin calls. It is not a Martingale per se, as it normally does not increase lot sizes by 1. However, I have seen it open a sell position with 0.01, and then buy at 0.03. There is alot of negative on the net about this EA, but at this point, I have not had a problem with it. I guess only time will tell.
"Risk means more things can happen than will happen."
EAguru
forex_trader_72918
Apr 09, 2012 부터 멤버   게시물121
Feb 28, 2013 at 21:16 (편집됨 Feb 28, 2013 at 21:17)
Anubis posted:
Funny. when I see a system like 'Toms EA crash', and the leverage is 1:500, it's like, 'Gee--I wonder why!?!' Here's some tips on running this EA succesfully: The minimum funding for this EA is $750. Thats in the manual. Although leverage is not discussed in the manual, I don't know why anyone would leverage 1:500. Seriously? Also, the acct must be a MICRO acct. trading 0.01 lots. If your going to spend the time studying an EA, set it up on demo, as though setting it up on real, and use the same broker that your real acct is on, as this EA will act differently on different brokers. This acct is set up exactly as I would a live acct. Leverage=1:100, funding=750, risk=2. I've tested this EA on several demo accts, and it works just fine. I'm also testing it on a lower $500 acct, to see how it handles lower funding. A basket of negative positions is normal for this EA. I've seen 10 to 20% of the funds deposited being used on a basket. It holds the negative ones, while taking the positive profits, so funding is CRITICAL to avoid margin calls. It is not a Martingale per se, as it normally does not increase lot sizes by 1. However, I have seen it open a sell position with 0.01, and then buy at 0.03. There is alot of negative on the net about this EA, but at this point, I have not had a problem with it. I guess only time will tell.

if strategy require leverage of big maxlots it use martingaile i think
로그인 / 가입하기 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*상업적 사용 및 스팸은 허용되지 않으며 계정이 해지될 수 있습니다.
팁: 이미지/유튜브 URL을 게시하면 게시물에 자동으로 삽입됩니다!
팁: @기호를 입력하여 이 토론에 참여하는 사용자 이름을 자동으로 완성합니다.