Ambush_Trader "의 게시물

Evolution MAM 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 06, 2016 at 08:31

Hello, Yes Ambush cap account is closed out an no longer live. Majority of funds were put into evolution mam

Myfxbook Autotrade 일반 에서 Nov 11, 2015 at 08:01

Im refering to the multiplier. It's relitive to the risk ratio the user sets. 1/2 risk ambush is 30%. DD etc.. We have many followers on myfx but 90% of them use a much lower multiplier from what we see in the admin area. Many followers less than half our risk.

Evolution MAM 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Nov 09, 2015 at 07:20

Hi Victor, the ambush capital account is highly leveraged now and the client deposited for us to do this before we "stepped on the gas". We have been scaling and trailing stops slowly but our setups are not even near their targets yet. We may be forced to close out soon as client is eager to cash out but, despite that we are at that time of year when the big market trends can happen and this is usually where our trading thrives. That being said, while the gain is massive, it's likely just the beginning of things to come if market volatility is really starting now.Evolution MAM cl...

Myfxbook Autotrade 일반 에서 Nov 06, 2015 at 09:20

DD is all relative, Ambush C is a high profile risk.You can look at our Evolution MAMs for lower riskhttp://www.myfxbook.com/members/EvolutionForex/evolution-mam/1273122/XaGdrDDAvP0FbFBihq0WDouble leverage version http://www.myfxbook.com/members/EvolutionForex/evolution-mam-bonus-leverage-2x/1354314We have a hedge fund that we trade 1/3 our leverage than the normal evolution mam. Our Trading is sound but it's a matter of what the risk appetite of the investor is and allocate accordingly.

Evolution MAM 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Nov 05, 2015 at 07:35

20% dd is nothing in forex when you consider our stats. DD is also relative and salable depending on what you goals are. We have a double leverage mam, an normal mam and 1/2 leverage .

Myfxbook Autotrade 일반 에서 Nov 05, 2015 at 07:34

says we are #13 on the list or you can just direct link to it here http://www.myfxbook.com/members/autotrade/ambush-capital/1036189

Myfxbook Autotrade 일반 에서 Oct 22, 2015 at 05:56

We actually increased our leverage quite a bit, which did add to our draw down initially, but has now resulted in the very fast recovery. Compared to other systems we were highly unleveraged, and we use our larger draw downs to increase our leverage. This is our way of showing our own confidence in how we trade, as well as increase our profitability over the long run. We have no plans to increase leverage again for some time as we are currently at the max leverage our trading team deems safe for our account size. Assuming our current trajectory, you will not see an increase in our leverage...

Myfxbook Autotrade 일반 에서 Aug 28, 2015 at 18:12

Let me tell you guys how autotrade is as a signal provider. We make money people join. We lose money people leave. As results people join at highs and leave at lows and very few are making money while we have had a huge gain this year. We have witnessed this cycle since last October and we are considering leaving autotrade .

LiveForexTradingSignals _ Aggressive Signals Account HD 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jun 17, 2015 at 06:40

Any system that is - Track Record Not Verified & Trading Privileges Not Verified is a red flag to begin with.

Boston Prime 브로커 에서 Jun 17, 2015 at 06:30

Hi sam, boston prime is bankrupt , Myfxbook needs to update the server name. Boston prime was a white label on boston tech with many other brokers. Ambush Capital's account is with Forexware Markets/FXDD on Boston Technologies Live Server, not Boston prime. We have multiplied our risk because we are working with a 40% DD on this . Or normal risk trading is our Evolution MAM, http://www.myfxbook.com/members/EvolutionForex/evolution-mam/1273122

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Jun 12, 2015 at 08:51

This is true, @rob559 i might have worded it wrong, many brokers have dealing desks, markup schemes etc, but direct manipulation is not as common anymore because there is so much FX mt4 broker competition the broker will lose the client. In regards to automated, i think the space is too crowded with people trying to automate. i think 90% of traders who find mt4 is because they hear of Automated EA's. I also think 90% of traders will put more effort into buying, building and experimenting with EA's than putting that same effort into developing the discipline and skill needed for manual ...

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Jun 12, 2015 at 08:47

my proofs are right here, no back tests, no ideas, just live accounts. http://www.myfxbook.com/members/EvolutionForex/evolution-mam/1273122https://www.myfxbook.com/members/Ambush_Trader/ambush-capital/1036189

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Jun 11, 2015 at 13:01

It's right here http://www.myfxbook.com/members/EvolutionForex/evolution-mam/1273122

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Jun 10, 2015 at 06:32

I don't agree that because it's automatic, it's better. These are the words of someone who cannot manually trade and fear it. If you were put you in a room with pencil , paper, quote board and a phone, you cannot pull money from the market. You need to optimize and enhance your program as the market changes in order to survive. This is a different talent than manual trading but it can take the same amount of work in the end. In the end, it only matters if you make money. So if EA's are working for you, then that's what you stick with.Your performance Looks good . Your live...

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Jun 05, 2015 at 11:10

Just following up with this thread... I see a lot of account links referenced a few months ago have been deleted. We don't deny EA's can make money , but the odds are far against you. The only automated things we have seen work in real life and make REAL money are at the institutional level where quants run algos to pick off flow from credit clients trading on aggregated liquidity. These same quants also work at retail brokers where they run stats and probability scenarios on profitable accounts for them to direct the flow right to their pocket before flushing it to their ,so called, &...

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Feb 20, 2015 at 11:36

To clarify, im talking small trades. You can set up and internal ECN and set the bridge connected to MT4 to send directly to the pool, but this usually starts at 5-10 lots because the Liquidity providers 90% of the time are pricing 1 mil per tick and prime brokers charge large fees below 2 lots. In general 98% of the time small trades(under 5 sometimes less) are pooled in the back end to be matched off with another MT4 clients exposure before going to the bank if it even has to.

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Feb 20, 2015 at 11:36

On what grounds? I happen to have worked for a prime broker's dealing desk, I know exactly how ECN and MT4 execution works, and I can tell you without a single deniable fact, that there is no such thing as ECN access through MT4... The reason? MT4 handles the quoting and trade confirmation in its own system- your trade never goes any further... ever... For starters, your size isnt even big enough to get a quote from the ECN (10k lot? 100k lot? Not on the ECN!) So your size gets pooled with the liquidity at the prime broker and will never even see pass through to the ECN... So I again re...

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Feb 18, 2015 at 19:39

I am in this business and i can tell you there is no real retail ecn on mt4, and no brokers taking .01 directly to liquidity providers . NDD is just a way of saying our internal exposure is handled via automated clearing or matching offset, not a desk. And to be clear, the volume used to match internally or what was cleared, is the risk the broker took from your trade. After internal matching on the so called "ECN" if there is no match it sends to the top of the book via STP. This is why there is slippage on ECN setups when you trade larger. Perfectly normal and acceptable. S...

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Feb 18, 2015 at 14:42

Yes but whats the systems ability to scale ? Do you have any Caesar account histories using 1 lot size ? I hear a lot of slippage using this system so it might only be good from small accounts where the broker is auto approving the trade and not sending it to the bank. There is nothing wrong with it, it just means it will never be an institutional level system that could make the real money and trade the real market. I suppose if you spread across a bunch of small brokers that bucket trades, it could do well for some time.

EA that actually works 일반 에서 Feb 18, 2015 at 07:48

It's not impossible but from my experience in years of trading and also sitting behind the desk of some bigger fx brokers doing analytics for bbooking retail clients and replicating profitable flow of credit clients, I can say chances of success are extremely low and any success will be short lived. Retail traders are better off investing more time and putting in the hard work required to be a successful manual trader. Very little edge for automated in the retail space, esp with the limits of mt4.

EURUSD	1.07643	GBPUSD	1.25564	AUDUSD	0.66228
USDJPY	154.426	USDCAD	1.36773	USDCHF	0.90725

Ambush_Trader 에 의한 게시물