mforce "의 게시물

Adcuratio High Risk 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Mar 09, 2022 at 14:19

It's a great EA in many senses - however, I don't need the EA for the trading I do for this part of my portfolio. On Adcuratio (which is just a part of my portfolio), I trade manually / discreationally, and with that style, I'm able to take the absolute best out of the system.

Adcuratio High Risk 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Aug 19, 2021 at 15:49

Hi,I'm not using Flex EA - I used to use it on some accounts earlier but haven't for months.

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Mar 03, 2021 at 13:24

Hi!Sorry for the delay in replying. This is going quite detailed - and would be nice to get to know you better - so I'll drop you a DM. Commenting to your comment about a grid system being able to be successful over longer-term (my system has been around just for a year really), it's not very common but certainly possible. If you look up Blackwave (Lazard here at Myfxbook), you'll see a grid trader that has been successfull with proven track record for more than the majority of other people. Yes, he trades a maual grid, not an automated one - but I'd say it's a proof that g...

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 24, 2021 at 22:20

Hey Fred,Sorry to hear that. I think this is the first time you're messaging to me? You must've taken the settings from my earlier posts? What I always try to say to everyone is that first of all, I haven't created the EA part of the strategy, and definitely can't take responsibility of it - I'm happy to help people but can't guarantee anything. My understanding is that the EA is very sensitive on things such as the broker being used - I'm not sure if you've been following my recommendations on that? And finally, Flex is a kind of an EA where you can have the ex...

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 25, 2021 at 16:49

Just to prove the point, you can see at some point of the history, the following sequence of position sizes (the starting position size it calculates based on account balance):0.07, 0.11, 0.18, 0.29, 0.46, 0.74.EDIT AFTERWARDS: Well, I noticed just deposited at that point, so we have skipped that sequence until this far and went directly to larger position sizes. So no, you won't find it in the history, sorry.. :)

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 25, 2021 at 16:44

Hey,You're not "far off", so I want to apologise, I was being also rude in my first response. You are very right on fibonacci, and congratulations, you must be quite good at maths. However, fibonacci sequence goes so that next number is always found by adding up the two numbers before it. This systems opens positions based on a fixed position size multiplier (x1.6) and then rounds up to the closest decimal to have a two decimal accuracy as lot sizing requires. It is very very similar, and actually looks exactly the same in the smaller lot sizes (while as later on there are then d...

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 25, 2021 at 11:51

Nice web etiquette - you probably should look into that - that's the only thing I'll say.

GROWEX Moderate 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 22, 2021 at 11:41

That's absolutely right in my experience and opinion as well. I'm lucky to have first found something that had a great potential for becoming the strategy / system that works for my mentality - and secondly because I was able to "make it my own" by doing adjustments to it.

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 19, 2021 at 14:41

Hi,Please PM me.

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 19, 2021 at 12:12

Yes, so it's not a martingale, but a counter-grid strategy - therefore it uses a multiplier, not a "doubler" / "tripler" like martingale. and sorry, it has nothing to do with fibonaccis.

GROWEX Moderate 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 14, 2021 at 17:08

Hi,So something you need to understand is that this is a copy account that copies the trades on my main account but with lower ratio which makes the risk lower. It's a also a new account, so the DD & profit values haven't not yet "settled" in their real level yet. The DD on the account should normally be around 8.8% (overall max. ever 14%)The profit should be 4-8%My system is working in the default setting of Half-Grid strategy that comes together at least with the version 4.66 of Flex EA. So you do need to buy the EA first. When you install the EA on the chart and go to...

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 11, 2021 at 10:02

Hi,So not sure what you mean by 'using leverage'? The amount of leverage available to you depends on your broker and the regulation they are part of (you know if they are US regulated, or if they are CySEC regulated, or if they are FCA regulated, or if they are ASIC regulated, or if they are part of some kind "overshore regulator" - the latter one usually allows for the most leverage. You can google those different regulations and find out what your broker is part of (where you live might in some cases also limit you of certain choices, for example if you're from US, your...

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Jan 03, 2021 at 11:09

Hi!If you read this discussion chain completely, you'll have the answer to all of your questions (and more). You can also always DM me if something is not clear. Hope this helps!

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Nov 16, 2020 at 15:31

Yes, you are right that it will only trade it on max. 3 currency pairs at a time - but that's not because of "2 max trade for same currency limit" but because there's a separate setting for setting that. Hope this helps!

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Nov 11, 2020 at 11:47

Hi!If you read this discussion chain completely, you'll have the answer to all of your questions (and more). Hope this helps!

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 19, 2020 at 08:42

The settings I use are provided by the vendor. If want to know more, feel free to DM me (you can also find many answers from this very same chain).

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 13, 2020 at 09:08

hmm? what do you mean?

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Sep 24, 2020 at 11:33

Yes, so the whole thing is to create something for a bigger active portfolio, where you just don't want to risk 35-70% of your portfolio anymore, and you want something more stable. Because this is not a "get rich fast" game but "build a consistently profitable system" game, right? And the whole idea is to spread the risk of a portfolio between those three accounts. Getting a 19% monthly return on your whole portfolio in the long-term is just not realistic, is it? Even the best professional traders in the world are in reality doing something like max 30-50% ROI per year...

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Sep 24, 2020 at 04:10

10 pairs means more exposure, but with those settings, the EA won't trade more than two pairs from each currency at a time (for example, only two USD pairs allowed at the same time. Of course mathematically that two is enough of course for that two pair stop). If you wanted to reduce exposure to correlating pairs your could set that setting to one, but you'd also be meddling with risk reward ratio and might change the system fundamentally - I haven't tried so I wouldn't know for sure). I know that how it's trading with my account I'm pretty confident (I was going to say...

Progressive 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Sep 23, 2020 at 08:40

Hi,Yes, I can shed light on that. As said earlier, I have left the absolute default Half-Grid settings on. I have FlexEA version 4.66 (which was the last stable version when I started to use Flex - now it seems they might start calling some of the newer versions the 'stable version'). I am using the strategy settings that come with basic, default Half-Grid strategy when you don't load any set files but just with the default EA select it from the dropdown menu from the settings (see screenshot attached) - I'm not using any of the 'recommended settings' from the guide or ...

EURUSD	1.07874	GBPUSD	1.25901	AUDUSD	0.66345
USDJPY	153.576	USDCAD	1.36593	USDCHF	0.90377

mforce 에 의한 게시물