stephanusR "의 게시물

te-ivt 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 25, 2010 at 19:23

Reason nobody has commented yet to ask you for your PAMM details is because.....drum-roll.....🙄..... your broker is marked as private. Thus your stats shouldn't be displayed at all. We first look at the broker and then only at the results.

SystemsFX.net (andryuha77) 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 22, 2010 at 20:11

This system is the presently nr.1 ranked system at Zulutrade as far as I know: http://zulutrade.com/TradeHistoryIndividual.aspx?pid=11487Their main page is at http://systemsfx.net/enNote that four out of the ten trading months had negative equity. This indicates that the system is gambling. An engineered system must have every single month in positive equity because the patterns than one trades repeats themselves on a daily basis. July/Aug were two months of negative growth in a row and then two months of positive growth. But the same patterns repeated themselves in Sept/Oct that were in Jul/A...

Petra Conservative 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 22, 2010 at 18:32

Withdrawls, deposits shouldn't make any difference to the abs.gain. Your system is now at 56% of equity worse from the 60% level. Would you agree that you don't really know what are doing and doing such with other peoples money?

ZuluTrade 신호 제공자 에서 Oct 20, 2010 at 18:39

This one does hundreds of clients from on master MT4 accounthttp://www.mtprogramming.com/tradecopier.htmlThen there is spyware riddled http://www.toolsfortradingtheforex.com/aboutproduct.html , it stakes snapshots of your screen back to the authors. http://tradecopier.com/1-master-upto-3-slave-copier/

Petra Conservative 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 19, 2010 at 17:03

Would you mind commenting on your steep losses, the account is at 60% of equity. Hope you didn't go long the euro as it peaked at 1.41

ZuluTrade 신호 제공자 에서 Oct 17, 2010 at 17:35

AAAFX is Zulu's own broking firm they own, thus with AAAFX your trades should execute. If you use zulutrade be sure to have aaafx execute the trades. They can more easily hedge the trades on currenex if there is enough followers for an account . With Alpari and others there is bound to be slippage and delays.

ZuluTrade 신호 제공자 에서 Oct 17, 2010 at 17:31

Take a signal provider and compare the draw-downs per trade to the gain. Pro-B5 is ranked at nr.2 or 3 but trades like a clown. He makes 9 winning trades in a row for 5 pips each only to wipe the entire gain with a 45 pip loss in the next trade.

Looking for Good Forex Traders To Trade My Capital 숙련된 트레이더 에서 Oct 08, 2010 at 05:33

Account GForce2 made nearly a 100% return on futures with a minimum account opening of $15000. A $100 account is meaningless because it doesn't simulate the emotional ups and downs of actually making $15000 as opposed to a $100. The small concern is that the Robbins world cup trading championship allows one to open multiple accounts and then only inform us about those that made money. Note that this is the only trading championship that is legit . The one for example that http://www.spyglasstrading.co.uk/ Mike Baghdady won doesn't exist. He can't produce even one real account state...

TradeLikePro 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 06, 2010 at 20:59

It went down 22% and then up 22% , showing that automated trading doesn't work. There is no substitute for knowing that only fundamentals is driving the USDCAD down through the floor, due to QE2. There is no EA out there that can show a two year track record. What we need is a 30 year record actually.

TradeLikePro 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 06, 2010 at 18:15

I don't see cast iron man 3 at http://www.myfxbook.com/members/stevetrade . Did it go bust?

InstaForex 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 05, 2010 at 10:02

It has nothing to do with being critical or being personal. The parameter [pip gain : draw-down ratio] for each trade scaled according to equity(1micro isn't the same as 1standard lot if both incurred a 70 pip draw-down) allows us to instantly quantify the risk reward ratio of a portfolio. There is nothing emotional about it, just an analytical evaluation of the risk incurred in making a return on equity. All trading systems must be listed from high to low according to this factor and not the present way of listing a system from highest gain to lowest return on equity. Careful inspecti...

Account Auditing 일반 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 15:52

Lets say you have 100 accounts and only have 1 audited, it would be pretty meaningless. What you should rather do is open a stocktwits.com account under one alias and make live calls.

Community is getting a hiding!! 일반 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 15:51

Where are these stats.?

Leprechaun (100% Risk) 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 15:43

-

GoMarkets-END 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 15:21

How much did you deposit, if it was $100 it would be meaningless because it doesn't reflect the real world. If you want to run a PAMM service you must show the deposits and what size the account is. It should be at least $2000 on Oanda but less on go markets due to higher leverage available.

InstaForex 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 15:14

This trade is a big problem for the long term viability of your system(1 oct 2010): 10.01.10 15:42 10.04.10 11:15 EURUSD Sell 0.20 0.00000 1.36990 1.37330 1.37110 22.0 4.40 2d 0.68%The position was left open for two days over the weekend it seems for a profit of only 22pips on a draw-down of 71 pips as the euro peaked at 1.3804. Thus the [pip gain : draw-down ratio] = 0.3 which is not good it must at least be 1. In other words 77 pip gain for 77 draw-down. If you your win rate comes in a 70% with lets say 10pips on each trade and the losing trades come at 3x...

Oanda:Tortoise 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 14:55

Your account was updated last 15 Sept. Since it is now 4 Oct.2010 and this is PAMM account you would agree that this isn't acceptable. Since you are selling a service ,you must update your accounts on a daily basis. Even if no trades were executed the account must still be updated. How much did you deposit,if it was $100 it would be meaningless because it doesn't reflect the real world.

GoMarkets-END 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 14:37

Very good results, you don't seem to carry loosing positions from day to day. Your last trade you averaged short into the euro rally , which is fine as long as the draw - down wasn't excessive. The account had only one day of negative pips out of a one month trading period. Hope you can up this performance in the weeks ahead because the account is only a month old. This account should be listed as nr.1 and not the present nonsense we have of 800%. The criteria must be broker first (go markets is fine), then the draw down factor etc. Telling us an account made 1000% is meaningless if w...

PAMM (Managed Accounts) running for +1yr 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 06:56

You have no proof either way, it isn't for us to prove or disprove who Ranesh is , it is he that must reveal his true identity since he expects people to give him money to trade in one his hundreds of fronting PAMM accounts.

PAMM (Managed Accounts) running for +1yr 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Oct 04, 2010 at 06:24

Ranesh PM'd me stating that he takes a 50% performance fee. He has to take 50% because he knows that his PAMM fund won't last more than three months. After three months he starts another system under another name. He also didn't reveal his real name or country of residence, one should not invest with people who are hiding behind multiple identities and companies. A PAMM system wishing to stay in business for years won't take more than 25% and even that might be to much.

모든 견적
AUDUSD	0.65057	USDCHF	0.9142
EURJPY	165.644	EURCHF	0.977
EURGBP	0.85905	GBPJPY	192.799
EURUSD	1.06864	GBPUSD	1.24384
USDJPY	155.003	USDCAD	1.3684

EURUSD	1.06864	GBPUSD	1.24384
USDJPY	155.003	USDCAD	1.3684

stephanusR 에 의한 게시물