zornjaso "의 게시물

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Mar 10, 2010 at 23:29

It hasn't been out for 30 days, so how do you have 30 days of trading to show them even? Am I to assume you were a beta tester? If not, then please clarify.

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Mar 02, 2010 at 04:57

Phil, LMD and HiRIDER ane not a load of baloney. They are both profitable if you set them up carefully. And potnentially, Neg-Correlation, Zoop, COBALT-FX, and SIMPLE all have the potential to be profitable and low-risk robots in the FRWC stable. Other than the ones I mentioned (lol, you know who you are Straasha, VREM2, SuperVolcano...) the others are FAR too risky for an account with anything less than $10,000. Its a shame they didnt make this more clear, although I am not even sure they know for certain the reality of this.I am probably getting a refund soon guys. At this point the only rob...

FXOpen (Nano) 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 28, 2010 at 03:00

Yes, they are, in reality, micro lots.

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 28, 2010 at 02:22

Personally, eafinder, I seek a return of 10% - 20% per month per account.

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 27, 2010 at 23:30

Clearpaper, in both cases you "added words/arguments" to the points I made. Here are my 2 points of response:(1.) You are totally correct that understanding LRR and the auto money management system(s) employed by these robots is important and, in many cases, it is very useful to use the automatic money management features. My contention was, and should have been more clearly articulated, that you should set the LRR to be *consistent* with what amounts to a conservative .01 or .02 lot size per $1,000 of capital (or, alternatively, do it manually like I do). NOT that you should always ...

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 27, 2010 at 22:31

Seriously, Clearpaper. The ONLY time I have had unforgivable losses when trading Forex, manually or with robots, has been when I have violated that rule. Perhaps others have ways of doing it better, but that has been my experience. Seriously.P.S. Clarification: .01 - .02 per $1,000 -- PER INDIVIDUAL TRADE! ... In some cases you have have several trades open, each at .01 - .02 (resulting in a total of more than .01 - .02 per $1,000. I hope that is clear.) I meant PER INDIVIDUAL TRADE EXECUTED.

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 27, 2010 at 20:46

Maybe I am being overly simplistic here, but is it really so hard to just set it to MM off, .01 or .02 per $1,000 invested, and let it trade reasonably? If you do that, you dont have to know what LRR is (or, at the least, you can learn about it without haphazardly applying it to your accounts, ESPECIALLY if they are real-money ones). Fixed lots of .01-.02 per $1,000 of equity is safe and profitable trading.

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 26, 2010 at 15:39

@RaphaelI don't think HiRIDER is a total crapshoot. So far I've concluded (through live trading) that SuperVolcano, AkuKaya, Straasha-System, and VREM2 have unacceptable risk profiles, or simply lose more than win. LMD is mixed results. On some pairs it is better than others, and more research is going to need to be done to figure out which ones. My preliminary results show that EURUSD is the worst performing LMD pair. So, in sum:HiRIDER, COBALT-FX, NEG-CORR, ZOOP, NUTCRACKER, SIMPLE = ACCEPTABLE/GOODLMD = UNDECIDEDSTRAASHA, SUPERVOLCANO, AKUKAYA, VREM2 = UNACCEPTABLE/BAD

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 26, 2010 at 15:31

Wow! You are right Robint! This was done within the past 1-2 hours, after I posted my last message! Read my previous lengthy post re: their results, and then in light of what you said, they've probably taken down their live results because THEY WEREN'T PERFORMING WELL. The drop back to v1.1a is a bit confusing, it may be that v1.1a is now what *used to be* v1.2...This story just keeps getting better...

FXOpen (Nano) 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 26, 2010 at 13:35

Yes, I use a complex mix of about 20 scalping EA's all set on low settings levels. A mix of commercial and tsd forum free EAs. :)

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 26, 2010 at 12:47

Up until now I have been a FRWC fanboy, but I am now truly disappointed in FRWC... They are manipulating their settings to deal with the out-of-the-box performance issues of some of their robots. As of 2/25 they downgraded their supposedly-default "0.02 lot standard across-the-board" to 0.01 now. They also re-enabled Straasha selectively -- NOT a default setting in v1.2 -- in order to recoup from some of the other losses they are getting from LMD and SuperVolcano. These both go against the principles of the default live conservative settings for Fusion-V, which can be followed in the...

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 25, 2010 at 03:05

If you look at how HiRIDER handled that exact trade on my GallantFX live account, you will see, oddly, that I got lucky and ended up 2.00 in profit for all 10 trades ($20), rather than 2 loss. So, that might be contrary to your suggestion re: the results being rigged or played with. If anything, they appear to be being honest by showing somewhat lackluster gains.Clearly, however, you are correct sooner that their update to 1.2 from 1.1 was made at some point between 2/5 and today, and since that does change default settings, they did, in fact, make changes over time (0.01 to 0.02 lots, Straash...

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 23, 2010 at 19:46

If you look at the new version 1.2, you will see that they did change several of the default settings. Here are some of them: (1) they now turn Straasha-System off by default, (2) they now turn HiRIDER's Strategy #1 off by default.(Also: I asked FRWC support about this... To answer a question asked and speculated about by several people -- the "conservative" setting consists of 0.01 or 0.02 per $1,000, MM off, and all other settings left as default.)In my opinion, in reviewing the settings, it would seem that the Straasha-System Next_Lot multiplier, Step multiplier, and number of...

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 21, 2010 at 14:54

I second Steve: the SuperVolcano sub-EA is not one of the EA's that relies on the open/minimized D1 charts that I had referenced in a previous post (LMD and perhaps one or two of the other sub-EA's do, however). I can confirm from my own trading that SuperVolcano relies upon its own internal coding, instead, to trade GBP/JPY without the chart needing to be opened.To your second question, eafinder: the answer is yes. The other sub-EA's rely on both the open/minimized D1 charts I referenced and/or their internal coding to trade on the pair(s) referenced in the manual for each respect...

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 21, 2010 at 03:08

@eafinderIt performed extremely well over 60 days of live testing. Not manipulated backtesting. Trust me, I spent money I barely have on this thing -- and my backtesting so far is showing extremely favorable results, and Im more skeptical than most.

FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari 트레이딩 시스템 에서 Feb 20, 2010 at 20:25

Your mistaken, Steve, regarding the D1 charts for Fusion. You have to have them open, per the manual's instructions. The Market Watch just lists all the available charts that can be opened, they are not open and available for use by the EAs in the Market Watch window -- only once you open the chart in the main area. So open the appropriate charts -- just minimize the D1 charts after you open them... if you want LMD and other's dependent on the D1 charts to function properly, that is. ;) It uses those charts for broader indicators of market trends ("it" being some of the EAs, ...

모든 견적
AUDUSD	0.6562	USDCHF	0.91076
EURJPY	167.37	EURCHF	0.9762
EURGBP	0.8533	GBPJPY	196.251
EURUSD	1.0718	GBPUSD	1.25595
USDJPY	156.251	USDCAD	1.3664

EURUSD	1.0718	GBPUSD	1.25595
USDJPY	156.251	USDCAD	1.3664

zornjaso 에 의한 게시물