Contest - mirusevxs33 (de mirusevxs33)

Gain : +0.0%
Drawdown 24.25%
Pips: 2191.4
Transactions 312
Gagné:
Perdu:
Type: Démo
Levier: 1:100
Trading: Automatisé

Discussion Contest - mirusevxs33

Aug 19, 2011 at 09:29
Vues 3,011
39 Replies
Membre depuis Apr 07, 2011   posts 72
Sep 06, 2011 at 20:58
lol... like you would share a successfully working EA..... Do your own work.

Freeloader...
"Taking responsibility is the cornerstone to a winning attitude"
Membre depuis Oct 06, 2010   posts 1
Sep 06, 2011 at 23:50
@mirusevxs33 impressive results, does your EA run on a VPS or at home office ?
Membre depuis May 10, 2010   posts 382
Sep 07, 2011 at 01:08

marty posted:
    I also invite everyone else to look through my comment history.. there's no conspiracy talk.. however, you will find that I'm well aware of market structure and regulations within the forex world. Think about that.

Actually, you have no clue marty...

Let the cow fly miru!! I do it every day on live accounts 😎
walker36
forex_trader_36599
Membre depuis May 13, 2011   posts 1341
Sep 07, 2011 at 01:22
I am currently working on a similiar project for 6 months.
my logic is based on 2 brokers and hedged trades.
the main algo is same. Math.
everthing is good on demo. but when you go live,

- latency
- broker order execution speed
- old ticks
- requotes on DD
- slippage on STP or STP/ECN
- VDP setups on broker side

are the main problems.
on the other hand if you do it that frequent and with average 1-5m trade time you have the smoking gun in your hand.
you will be caught by the broker soon. and if you lucky you can get back your equity. or your order execution speed on broker side will be higher then 2-5 secs.

ıf you feel yourself lucky that not caught yet do not worry it will happen.

there are solutions for all those but need hard work. 😄

regards
walker

Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010   posts 123
Sep 07, 2011 at 03:42
Thanks to all supporting me :) Am always glad when I meet joy...

@Steve, that is not the case, it is not good only on demo.
@ForexPro, Thanks! :)
@Rob, the second is true... no vps
@ijkuwari, sorry!
@Splexin, yeah, it is fully automated, just looking it few times a day.
@Will, sure, I do it... look max lot ... of 20 .... pffff
@benji, am not sure what you ask to do...?
@Dominic, Thanks! and for the dime too :)
@uriyaz, nope, sorry and thanks for the joy :)

Wish you best! :)
Membre depuis Jun 27, 2011   posts 30
Sep 07, 2011 at 06:24
hey miru, your bot is really good. at that rate, i suppose u r already a millionaire????😉
Membre depuis Jun 27, 2011   posts 30
Sep 07, 2011 at 06:24
just a suggestion. y not after this competition (to be fair), make your bot for sale. charge a $500 at least for it. all of us in the competition would have realise its ability already. n u would hv a at least a potential 1000++ clients. imagine hw much u would hv made man. haf a mill?? haha i m dreamig am i?😉
Membre depuis Apr 11, 2011   posts 6
Sep 07, 2011 at 06:43
dylanlau posted:
    hey miru, your bot is really good. at that rate, i suppose u r already a millionaire????😉

If it worked he wouldn't be screwing around with a contest for 2,500.
Membre depuis Jul 31, 2009   posts 1444
Sep 07, 2011 at 07:14
<b>Guys, please note that this account has been disqualified from the contest as it's clearly seen that it is benefiting from price latency, specifically that of a demo platform.

Thanks.</b>
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010   posts 123
Sep 07, 2011 at 08:08
well... :)
I always presume that some reputation matters and acting just upon an assumption without giving *any* clues about, would be funny if it was not just sad.
Even the account is disabled by GoMarkets so even no statements - so, wonder who hide something...?
Disqualified upon an assumption ....may drive some negative reputation, right? Not to me btw :)
So, good luck GoMarkets! You do not like scalping, it is obvious! :)
expat1967
forex_trader_17053
Membre depuis Aug 21, 2010   posts 11
Sep 07, 2011 at 08:16

Staff posted:
    <b>Guys, please note that this account has been disqualified from the contest as it's clearly seen that it is benefiting from price latency, specifically that of a demo platform.

Thanks.</b>

Clearly seen? Where is the proof of your statement/claim?

Without putting facts on the table your statement is utter worthless and a disqualification more than questionable...
Membre depuis Apr 15, 2011   posts 179
Sep 07, 2011 at 08:43
Membre depuis Mar 15, 2011   posts 2
Sep 07, 2011 at 23:15 (édité Sep 07, 2011 at 23:22)
<span class='quotes'>expat1967 posted: <br> <b>Clearly seen? Where is the proof of your statement/claim?

Without putting facts on the table your statement is utter worthless and a disqualification more than questionable...</b><br>
Totally agree. You state 'clearly seen' so kindly qualify your findings rather than assume we accept your findings on the basis that you are staff. This is totally out of order, so afford us the information and allow us to make judgements based on facts !
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010   posts 27
Sep 07, 2011 at 23:21
It's not out of order at all.. GoMarkets made the call, not staff. The 'clearly' part is in his trade history if you need proof.
Never trade for the sake of trading. Instead, wait for the trades where you have a clear advantage and exploit it.
Membre depuis Mar 15, 2011   posts 2
Sep 07, 2011 at 23:37
Well marty.... it would seem that appropriation of statements should be merited based on factual evidence. So here's your chance to educate novices such as I who would like proof of your claim. Also appreciate that my cynicism is based on one of the tall poppy syndromes, so common place in the trading arena, so please do not interpret my challenge as any more than a chance to explore your findings and learn. I am looking forward to this show of 'history' that demonstrates this.
J Pratt
Membre depuis Jul 23, 2010   posts 70
Sep 08, 2011 at 01:26
He simply exploited the fact that a demo platform allows for executions that would not be executed in a live money trading platform.
go with the flow; just be on the right end of the wave
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010   posts 27
Sep 08, 2011 at 02:20 (édité Sep 08, 2011 at 02:21)

prattpot posted:
    Well marty.... it would seem that appropriation of statements should be merited based on factual evidence. So here's your chance to educate novices such as I who would like proof of your claim. Also appreciate that my cynicism is based on one of the tall poppy syndromes, so common place in the trading arena, so please do not interpret my challenge as any more than a chance to explore your findings and learn. I am looking forward to this show of 'history' that demonstrates this.
J Pratt


Let's backup for a moment.

I want to address something first and foremost. It's not my place, nor my responsibility to educate anyone here on these boards.

The demanding nature most people take on when participating on online trading forums, to me, serves as a vile poison to the online community. Further to that, it greatly perplexes me that people dare to take a side in such matters without understanding the true underlying issue... It had nothing to do with this account preforming 'too well' vs the others. As you pointed out with the mention of tall poppy syndrome, you might believe this happened all over the account doing too well.. but if that's the case, then your world is being viewed through greed coloured glasses.

GoMarkets didn't cut this account down because it had the most monopoly money, that's just silly.

Ask yourself, why would GoMarkets disqualify someone from a demo contest? There's no monetary difference to them, at the end of the contest they will be paying out the same prize money. Right now, other contestants have reached near or greater results than this account, but they are left untouched.. what makes this account so special to be singled out? ...it wasn't real money being made after all.

The real problem here was 'how' it was being made.

You see, this shady contestant wasn't trading against the market, but instead using an exploit in the demo account and price feed to take quick but 'fake' profits.

The contestant used a method of trading against market making (MM) brokers and applied it to the demo contest. I posted earlier about this and I'll reiterate:

How it works is simple:

1 - The exploiter starts by signing up to a quote service to get real time price updates from multiple sources in the market, and ties this into his EA running on GoMarket's MT4.
2 - Market price for a given currency pair moves a few pips suddenly.
3 - The exploiter's EA realizes that GoMarket's quote hasn't adjusted to the new price, and opens a trade that will be profitable once the price change has been realized by GoMarket's quote feed.
4 - The trade is then closed within seconds to book profits. Often these profits are only a fraction of a pip since the delay in price feed and differences in quotes is often quite small.

The contestant's particular EA goes a step further and uses the small price advantage as the opening of his trade, sometimes letting a profitable trade run for a few pips in a profitable direction before closing.

This is a huge problem for brokers who act as a market maker since they'll never have a chance to hedge their side of the trade... any system they have to hedge their risk fails since the market would have already moved off quote from the price they delivered the client. That being said, nearly all brokers who act as a market maker have a system setup to catch and eject people trying to exploit them (it's all too common to see threads start up in forums about brokers who refuse to pay out profits but give the initial deposits back to an offending client.. these are usually related lag/price-delay trading.)

How to tell if someone is exploiting price delays is quite simple:

- Average duration is in the seconds, some as short as 1 second.
- Despite the second(s) long duration, the profit realized in such short time frames is substantial.
- Putting these two points together...just run the probabilities that an account can cleanly catch 10+ pip moves within a second's time to open and close a given trade, and do so on a consistent bases with a 90%+ win percentage. It becomes statistically impossible.

GoMarkets won't have this problem on live accounts since they are an STP broker. This is a problem that plagues market makers. Since this is a demo contest however, the demo platform is susceptible to such exploits.

Never trade for the sake of trading. Instead, wait for the trades where you have a clear advantage and exploit it.
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010   posts 27
Sep 08, 2011 at 02:33 (édité Sep 08, 2011 at 02:36)
All that being said, I hope thing brings you to the realization that this contestant was robbing each and every other contest participant of a chance to place high in the rankings on trading skill. Had he taken first (as was his placement before being cut out of the contest) he was robbing 2nd place of 1st place's prize money.

Further, his trade results would just confuse the people looking to learn from the analytic studies of his account long after the contest is over... (which if you haven't already done so, check out the winners of the past contests and see their trade records. Its a great resource and gives you an idea of how profitable people trade.)

The spirit of this contest is about trading.. not exploiting a glitch in the price feed.

... I don't mean to come off so harsh, but do understand how infuriating it is to be questioned by the people who'll benefit the most from his person's ejection from the contest. It's not even logical why some people will defend him, demand evidence that's available right in his trade records, and even ask to buy his EA off him... but then again, when greed is involved logic can go out the window.

That's it, I'm done with this topic.. if you want to know more, do some research on price delay (lag) trading and how they plague market makers.
Never trade for the sake of trading. Instead, wait for the trades where you have a clear advantage and exploit it.
Membre depuis Apr 22, 2010   posts 123
Sep 08, 2011 at 04:49
lol 'this shady contestant' :)

'check out the winners of the past contests and see their trade records' - are you serious??? do you really advise novice traders to learn from there? do you do/did that :))))

'That's it, I'm done with this topic..' - oh, really? you like to do that on daily basis :)

giving homework to other, try to do it himself first... you are with feelings that you know brokerages and how they work, but for sure you know no more than advertisings :)

but enough with free advises, you may deserve it, but i have no time for that :)

good luck
Membre depuis Sep 07, 2009   posts 7
Sep 08, 2011 at 06:06
Well mirusevxs33, I'm curious about something.... You're profile shows a trade record with 310,000 % in a month. From 10K to 32million. Are you saying that those are all fair trades with no latent/lag trading advantage ??

If lag trading were allowed, there would be no contest, because everyone would attempt to create artificial trade programs to try and 'win' a couple grand trading account.

I'm not trying to upset you, but I agree with the mods.
Se connecter / S’inscrire to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*Lutilisation commerciale et le spam ne seront pas tolérés et peuvent entraîner la fermeture du compte.
Conseil : Poster une image/une url YouTube sera automatiquement intégrée dans votre message!
Conseil : Tapez le signe @ pour compléter automatiquement un nom dutilisateur participant à cette discussion.