ARES - FxOpen (के जरिए VipFX)
The user has made his system private.
ARES - FxOpen चर्चा करें
Jul 27, 2011 at 08:38
634 व्यू
4 Replies
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 25, 2010
95 पोस्टों
Dec 29, 2011 at 09:23
Hi VipFX,
Out of curiosity, what's the reason for this account performing so differently from the other Ares accounts?
Out of curiosity, what's the reason for this account performing so differently from the other Ares accounts?
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 18, 2010
15 पोस्टों
Dec 29, 2011 at 09:44
Hello
I found 2 reasons.
1. The Ares Logic usally closes some (not all) positions even short before the reach there target point (Secure profits). But this function is not working with FxOpen and therfore can keep positions open extra long (until targhet is reached). But I will find a solution with other parameters. It will take some time.
2. This was my mistake by using a too large Lot size, 2 pairs simultan, based on Account balance. In future I need to reduce lot size and use more conservative paramaters to reduce drawdown.
The system in general is very flexible to handle different conditions, but it takes times and real time market experience to narrow down the best suited parameters on some brokers. I hope the explanation helps.
I found 2 reasons.
1. The Ares Logic usally closes some (not all) positions even short before the reach there target point (Secure profits). But this function is not working with FxOpen and therfore can keep positions open extra long (until targhet is reached). But I will find a solution with other parameters. It will take some time.
2. This was my mistake by using a too large Lot size, 2 pairs simultan, based on Account balance. In future I need to reduce lot size and use more conservative paramaters to reduce drawdown.
The system in general is very flexible to handle different conditions, but it takes times and real time market experience to narrow down the best suited parameters on some brokers. I hope the explanation helps.
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 25, 2010
95 पोस्टों
Dec 29, 2011 at 17:14
(एडिट हो रहा है Dec 29, 2011 at 17:15)
Thanks for the reply.
1. Could it be due to the FXOpen 5-digit pricing as opposed to 6-digit?
I hope you manage to recover this account. If you would like some coding assistance, I should be able to assist, I'd love to brainstorm the problem.
1. Could it be due to the FXOpen 5-digit pricing as opposed to 6-digit?
I hope you manage to recover this account. If you would like some coding assistance, I should be able to assist, I'd love to brainstorm the problem.
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 18, 2010
15 पोस्टों
Dec 29, 2011 at 18:07
4 or 5 digits broker are not a problem.
FxOpen has sometimes large spreads and therfore block the profit taking by the system. Also they do not allow trailing stops which are nearby, and nearby TP. But I do not worry about it as long there are other brokers with trader friendly enviroments. I may close the account soon and start a more conservative setup in a PAMM account at FxOpen.
Thanks for your offer to find the problem.
FxOpen has sometimes large spreads and therfore block the profit taking by the system. Also they do not allow trailing stops which are nearby, and nearby TP. But I do not worry about it as long there are other brokers with trader friendly enviroments. I may close the account soon and start a more conservative setup in a PAMM account at FxOpen.
Thanks for your offer to find the problem.
तबसे मेंबर है Feb 25, 2010
95 पोस्टों
Jan 03, 2012 at 20:46
Good to know about the trailing stop limitation. I suppose you could set a soft TP in your code, and leave your trailing stop logic to operate as per normal, pushing the hard TP up via OrderModify(as I believe you do so now).
All the best for your PAMM account!
All the best for your PAMM account!
*व्यवसायिक इस्तेमाल और स्पैम को ब्रदाश नहीं किया जाएगा, और इसका परिणाम खाता को बन्द करना भी हो सकता है.
टिप: किसी चित्र या यूट्यूब या URL को पोस्ट करने से वे अपने आप आपके पोस्ट में आजाएगा!
टिप: @ चिन्ह को टाइप करें उपभोगता के नाम को अपने आप करने के लिए जो इस चर्चा में भाग ले रहा है.
