From Bitcoin’s Promise to AI in Governance
When I first got into Bitcoin, what amazed me wasn’t the price charts but the fact that it worked without banks or governments calling the shots. Just miners, code, and people agreeing on a system they believed in. That idea of decentralized rules felt groundbreaking at the time. Fast forward a bit and I started paying attention to DAOs. The vision was bold, but in practice, it often felt messy. Low voter turnout, endless proposals, and a sense that only a handful of people actually steered decisions. It made me wonder if governance in Web3 was destined to stall. Lately, I have noticed new experiments where AI is being pulled into the picture. Not in a hype sense, but in ways like helping draft proposals, scanning for risks, or giving delegates tools so they are not just faceless addresses. It reminds me a little of how early Bitcoin felt, an experiment, unpolished, but hinting at something that might matter later. I am torn though. Is this AI plus governance idea the natural evolution of DAOs, or just another layer of complexity that will not solve the core problem of participation? Bitcoin showed me code can change money. But can code plus AI really change how people make collective decisions? Curious to hear how others here see it. Worth watching, or noise?
Bitget has introduced AI to it Exchnage to allow traders get real time analysis on the go called GetAgent. You can even use it to earn some BGB tokens as you trade in the Onchain trading challenge phase 20. Earned some in the last one using the AI to trade
