MT4/MT5 Strategy Tester: How Reliable Are the Backtest Results?

Feb 10 at 09:46
90流覽
1 Replies
會員從Nov 23, 2024開始   6帖子
Feb 10 at 09:46

I've seen mixed opinions on the reliability of MT4/MT5's Strategy Tester when it comes to backtesting EAs and strategies. Some traders trust it blindly, while others argue that it's far from reflecting real market conditions.


A few concerns that come up:


Tick Data Quality: The default data isn't always accurate, and slippage/spreads in live trading can be very different.


Execution Differences: Backtests don't account for real execution delays, requotes, or liquidity issues.


Overfitting Risk: Optimized backtests may show excellent results but fail in live conditions.


Fixed vs. Variable Spreads: Many traders overlook the impact of real-time spread fluctuations.


So, how much weight do you give to MT4/MT5 backtests? Have you found them to be reliable, or have you seen major discrepancies between backtest and live performance? Let’s discuss!

Consistency isn’t luck, it’s mastery
會員從Feb 08, 2025開始   51帖子
Feb 11 at 00:44

You may want to add more spreads to make it realistic.Use stop orders to prevent issues with execution differences.Once you find a good strategy, do quick forward testing to get a sensing of your algo. 

My trades are available for social copying at IC Social. Find me on X @blufxnet.
登錄 / 註冊 to comment
You must be connected to Myfxbook in order to leave a comment
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。