EA MartiStoch v.2.0 (由 forex_trader_72498)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
Edit Your Comment
EA MartiStoch v.2.0討論

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Jul 29, 2013 at 12:32
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
AssetFX posted:
http://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/ea-martistoch-conservative-2010-2013/41036 - Older version
http://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/ea-martistoch-v20-conservative-2009/44255 - newer version
How does the new version 2.0 "" would pass that "D-day" - with only 20% of balance lost, "" .
Are we suppose to run your robot with the 20% max DD equity Protection ( drawdownlimit)? because your 2.0 version backtest does not use a 20% maxDD and your DD is higher than 20% in reports.
My concern is you suggest a setting that you do not test in backtest.
No, 20% DD occurred on that D-day, but that doesn't mean these 20% is an absolute maximum of possible DD, it may be higher other day.

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Jul 29, 2013 at 12:35
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
AssetFX posted:
http://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/ea-martistoch-v20-conservative-2009/44255
Can you explain why the EA would open a 1.62 lot and close for 13 pips then reopen the Same Lot size at the same minute the previous trade closed?
Isn't this a waste of commission?
The closing logic the same as the Opening logic? Or this is no logic after the first open positions? Please explain!
10.30.2009 13:00 10.30.2009 13:59 EURUSD Sell 1.62 1.50358 1.47928 1.48058 1.47928 13.0 194.40 59m 3.04%
10.30.2009 13:59 10.30.2009 15:16 EURUSD Sell 1.62 1.50221 1.47791 1.47921 1.47791 13.0 194.40 1h 17m 2.95%
You can call this waste of commission as well, but main purpose of this is to fix some profit before it turned to loss. Has such logic a right to exist?

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Jul 29, 2013 at 12:36
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
AssetFX posted:
Conservative settings at 9% DD ( 1k deposit )
Aggressive setting at 58% DD ( 2k deposit )
This Calculates that Aggressive setting has DD with 12 Times the Risk > Conservative and 3x Gains <
Aggressive setting is 12 times riskier and only 3 times more Gains.
Agree. That is why we always recommend conservative trading.

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Jul 29, 2013 at 12:39
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
AssetFX posted:
07.29.2013 10:01 07.29.2013 10:41 EURUSD Buy 0.02 -252.80 17.20 1.32708 1.32880 17.2 3.24 40m 0.27%
07.29.2013 09:29 07.29.2013 10:41 EURUSD Buy 0.01 -254.10 15.90 1.32721 1.32880 15.9 1.49 1h 12m 0.13%
Why is there only 2 pip difference in Open Price between these orders?
Doesn't this mean No grid element? Please explain.
Yes, there is no grid element in this EA. This is NOT a grid EA. Trades are opened when the signals appear and pass all the filters, regardless of the distance from the previous trades.

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Jul 29, 2013 at 12:49
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
AssetFX posted:
At level 5, the Lot multiplier went to 10x. I thought the multiplier was 3x all the way through? Did I miss something? I found this comment on DonnaForex. I can not confirm if more trades were suppose to be included in this Basket.
The multiplier is 2, but it multiplies not the last lot, but cumulative open lots. The reason of this is to shorten exposure time of high volume trades - the bigger is lot, the smaller TP is required to close the basket.
AssetFX posted:
From what is displayed , at Level 5, the Lotsize is relatively larger than what our Margin would allow at most fx broker. Can I open a 4.86 Lot with a 4900 Balance? No. What account leverage is used during your Backtests?
You can. Even with a leverage 200:1, while we are using 500:1 leverage. Not only for backtesting, for the live trading as well.
Ohhh, seems all your queries are answered, you can go on now, but not so fast, pleaaaaaaaaase 😁😲🙄

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Aug 01, 2013 at 11:49
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
andyngeow posted:
Hi Sir,
Can you please do me a favor by email me the backtest for MartiStoch 2.0 with conservative mode for period 01/06/2013 ~ 31/07/2013 ? I'll put this EA in my selections if i'm able to know the DD for this 2 months.
Thank you very much.
My "favorite" terminal with 90% quality history data is busy today with another EA optimization. I run requested BT on another terminal and attach its graph so far. Tomorrow I will provide full test report with 90% quality.

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Aug 02, 2013 at 07:36
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
andyngeow posted:
Hi Sir,
Can you please do me a favor by email me the backtest for MartiStoch 2.0 with conservative mode for period 01/06/2013 ~ 31/07/2013 ? I'll put this EA in my selections if i'm able to know the DD for this 2 months.
Thank you very much.
Here it is!
Aug 02, 2013 at 09:14
會員從May 08, 2013開始
25帖子
Hi Again,
Another question, It's really difficult for me to figure out what is the different compare with MartiGrid & MartiStoch V2.0.
MartiStoch V2.0 has a very good profit factor, but i'm afraid the DD and large lot size is implemented, because i'm going to start with $1000 only. Is that too risky?
I like MartiGrid with higher winning ratio, tight TP while keeping same lot size up to 10 trades. I guess is it using Lower Cost Averaging Strategy then follow by Martingale Strategy, am I right?
Comparison for both:
1. Which one has the lower DD?
2. Same H1 timeframe?
3. How to determine the TP & SL for MartiStoch? As i know MartiGrid TP is 20 pips, and SL?
4. Am i able to limit the MAXIMUM lot size and open trade for both version?
5. Only support one currency pair? How about others?
6. It's based on over brought & over sold for entry point? Or it's scalping by trend?
Thanks again,
Andy
Another question, It's really difficult for me to figure out what is the different compare with MartiGrid & MartiStoch V2.0.
MartiStoch V2.0 has a very good profit factor, but i'm afraid the DD and large lot size is implemented, because i'm going to start with $1000 only. Is that too risky?
I like MartiGrid with higher winning ratio, tight TP while keeping same lot size up to 10 trades. I guess is it using Lower Cost Averaging Strategy then follow by Martingale Strategy, am I right?
Comparison for both:
1. Which one has the lower DD?
2. Same H1 timeframe?
3. How to determine the TP & SL for MartiStoch? As i know MartiGrid TP is 20 pips, and SL?
4. Am i able to limit the MAXIMUM lot size and open trade for both version?
5. Only support one currency pair? How about others?
6. It's based on over brought & over sold for entry point? Or it's scalping by trend?
Thanks again,
Andy

forex_trader_72498
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
Aug 02, 2013 at 11:29
會員從Apr 05, 2012開始
93帖子
andyngeow posted:
Hi Again,
Another question, It's really difficult for me to figure out what is the different compare with MartiGrid & MartiStoch V2.0.
MartiStoch V2.0 has a very good profit factor, but i'm afraid the DD and large lot size is implemented, because i'm going to start with $1000 only. Is that too risky?
I like MartiGrid with higher winning ratio, tight TP while keeping same lot size up to 10 trades. I guess is it using Lower Cost Averaging Strategy then follow by Martingale Strategy, am I right?
Comparison for both:
1. Which one has the lower DD?
2. Same H1 timeframe?
3. How to determine the TP & SL for MartiStoch? As i know MartiGrid TP is 20 pips, and SL?
4. Am i able to limit the MAXIMUM lot size and open trade for both version?
5. Only support one currency pair? How about others?
6. It's based on over brought & over sold for entry point? Or it's scalping by trend?
Thanks again,
Andy
1. MartiStoch v.2.0 has the lower DD.
2. Yes.
3. TP and SL are floating for MartiStoch, no SL for MartiGrid.
4. Yes.
5. Designed for EURUSD. No reason to use with another pairs.
6. Not exactly, both of them use a lot of indicators of different nature.
會員從Jun 03, 2010開始
675帖子

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。