Forex Grid Trader EA [FX Clearing] (由 FxGridTraderEA)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
Edit Your Comment
Forex Grid Trader EA [FX Clearing]討論

forex_trader_55397
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
Aug 20, 2012 at 16:37
(已編輯Aug 20, 2012 at 16:46)
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
vladrac posted:
Indeed the level of discussion in this thread makes me double think the professionalism of the whole thing.
Well, sorry to hear that you already paid for it, Vladrac..we all learn from our mistakes and would be more vigilant in the future. However, I wouldn't undermine the level of professionalism these crooks possessed. First, they came here promulgating their so-called product..then, came a proxy ID called Rob in the pretext of being a buyer/user. This had everyone fooled thinking the buyer was a genuine one. I was initially wary of who this Rob was, given that he was being all too eager sucking up to their balls, but he confirmed his identity by spittting out the kind of language his mama wouldn't use in favor of defending those FGT crooks..
I'll send you a copy the FGT EA source codes that I had unplugged from the .dll file, which you requested in PM..
Rgds..
Aug 20, 2012 at 17:10
會員從Jul 31, 2012開始
210帖子
Thx, however, I still dont have confirmation as this Grid EA you mentioned seem to really open 2 opposite trades and this one is not really doing that.
I'd just would like to confirm more information about why/when it makes an entry? Or its just a fairly guess which is then compensated by level trading and increasing lots size along the way?
Rgds,
Vlad
I'd just would like to confirm more information about why/when it makes an entry? Or its just a fairly guess which is then compensated by level trading and increasing lots size along the way?
Rgds,
Vlad
vladrac@

forex_trader_29148
會員從Feb 11, 2011開始
1768帖子
Aug 20, 2012 at 17:51
(已編輯Aug 20, 2012 at 17:59)
會員從Feb 11, 2011開始
1768帖子
Meta4r3x posted:vladrac posted:Meta4r3x posted:
'rip-off' is pertinent to the EA, not the profits, don't try to divert the attention..robby boy..
and if your world does not understand plain English, let me spell it out for you..this EA they are selling is just a copy of another EA which you can freely download from the internet..
Why does he believe this is the same EA? Any proofs of that?
Here's the main trading logic of FGT which I had extracted from the ex4/dll files:
if (gi_328 && gi_316 < 1) {
ld_28 = iClose(Symbol(), 0, 2);
ld_36 = iClose(Symbol(), 0, 1);
gd_248 = Bid;
gd_256 = Ask;
if ((!gi_336) && !gi_332) {
gi_300 = gi_316;
if (ld_28 > ld_36) {
gd_304 = f0_14(OP_SELL);
if (gd_304 > 0.0) {
gi_340 = f0_15(1, gd_304, gd_248, Slippage, gd_248, 0, 0, TradeComment + " " + MagicNumber + "-" + gi_300, MagicNumber, 0, HotPink);
if (gi_340 < 0) {
Print(gd_304, "Error: ", GetLastError());
return (0);
}
gd_264 = f0_2();
gi_344 = TRUE;
}
} else {
gd_304 = f0_14(OP_BUY);
if (gd_304 > 0.0) {
gi_340 = f0_15(0, gd_304, gd_256, Slippage, gd_256, 0, 0, TradeComment + " " + MagicNumber + "-" + gi_300, MagicNumber, 0, Lime);
if (gi_340 < 0) {
Print(gd_304, "Error: ", GetLastError());
return (0);
}
gd_272 = f0_7();
gi_344 = TRUE;
}
}
}
And here's the main trading logic of the free EA which I had extracted from the ex4 files:
if (gi_380 && gi_368 < 1) {
l_iclose_16 = iClose(Symbol(), 0, 2);
l_iclose_24 = iClose(Symbol(), 0, 1);
g_bid_292 = Bid;
g_ask_300 = Ask;
if (!gi_388 && !gi_384) {
gi_352 = gi_368;
if (l_iclose_16 > l_iclose_24) {
gd_356 = fGetLots(OP_SELL);
if (gd_356 > 0.0) {
gi_392 = OpenPendingOrder(1, gd_356, g_bid_292, slip, g_bid_292, 0, 0, gs_336 + "-" + gi_352, g_magic_248, 0, HotPink);
if (gi_392 < 0) {
Print(gd_356, "Error: ", GetLastError());
return (0);
}
gd_308 = FindLastBuyPrice();
gi_396 = TRUE;
}
} else {
gd_356 = fGetLots(OP_BUY);
if (gd_356 > 0.0) {
gi_392 = OpenPendingOrder(0, gd_356, g_ask_300, slip, g_ask_300, 0, 0, gs_336 + "-" + gi_352, g_magic_248, 0, Lime);
if (gi_392 < 0) {
Print(gd_356, "Error: ", GetLastError());
return (0);
}
gd_316 = FindLastSellPrice();
gi_396 = TRUE;
}
}
}
For those who understand the programming language Mql4, they would know that the trading logics of these two EAs are identical..that's just partial of what I could paste here due to the size of the codes..the full codes will reveal that FGT & the free EA have 100% identical trading logics and therefore, they are the same EA..
If the need arises, I will upload the FGT EA here to be downloaded (everyone can use it freely, without any limitations as I had removed all restrictions including server authentication dependency & glitches that's associated with that)..and I will also upload a link where this free EA can be downloaded for that matter, a comparison can be made by those who are well verse in Mql4 programming; they can verify and attest to my claims..
it was about time that you bring some proofs,what the ea name? put up or shut up

forex_trader_55397
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
Aug 20, 2012 at 18:24
(已編輯Aug 20, 2012 at 18:53)
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
vladrac posted:
Thx, however, I still dont have confirmation as this Grid EA you mentioned seem to really open 2 opposite trades and this one is not really doing that.
I'd just would like to confirm more information about why/when it makes an entry? Or its just a fairly guess which is then compensated by level trading and increasing lots size along the way?
Rgds,
Vlad
It doesn't open 2 opposite trades immediately after you attached the EA, if that's what you were asking. The EA has a trading logic which looks for the 2 immediate consecutive closed candles to determine the first entry. If the closed price of the previous candle is lower than the closed price of the candle before it, the EA would make a Short entry and vice versa for a Long entry. The second entry onwards are calculated based on the pipsteps you set on the input. If it's 23, then the EA will make an entry every 23 pips when the price goes against the current trade(s). Sometimes when spikes occurs, you may not get exactly 23 pips and steps would be much bigger due to requotes/trade context busy & other nonsense from the broker. 😄
I believe you are not getting 2 opposite trades because you only attached the EA to one chart. You need to attach the EA to 2 charts of the same symbol and on the Expert Common tab you need to set 'Long only' for one chart and 'Short only' for the other chart.
Rgds..
Aug 21, 2012 at 06:11
會員從Jul 31, 2012開始
210帖子
I am use to do level trading similar to this, I guess what I need is to use the EA part that does the level trading as the grid part, Im not sure it really works. Also for a pair like GU, the default 15level pips is too short in my opinion, but then again, with martingale involved if you have a big enough pocket you can get out of a losing strike , I guess.
btw, where's the code you were going to send me ;)
btw, where's the code you were going to send me ;)
Meta4r3x posted:vladrac posted:
Thx, however, I still dont have confirmation as this Grid EA you mentioned seem to really open 2 opposite trades and this one is not really doing that.
I'd just would like to confirm more information about why/when it makes an entry? Or its just a fairly guess which is then compensated by level trading and increasing lots size along the way?
Rgds,
Vlad
It doesn't open 2 opposite trades immediately after you attached the EA, if that's what you were asking. The EA has a trading logic which looks for the 2 immediate consecutive closed candles to determine the first entry. If the closed price of the previous candle is lower than the closed price of the candle before it, the EA would make a Short entry and vice versa for a Long entry. The second entry onwards are calculated based on the pipsteps you set on the input. If it's 23, then the EA will make an entry every 23 pips when the price goes against the current trade(s). Sometimes when spikes occurs, you may not get exactly 23 pips and steps would be much bigger due to requotes/trade context busy & other nonsense from the broker. 😄
I believe you are not getting 2 opposite trades because you only attached the EA to one chart. You need to attach the EA to 2 charts of the same symbol and on the Expert Common tab you need to set 'Long only' for one chart and 'Short only' for the other chart.
Rgds..
vladrac@

forex_trader_55397
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
Aug 21, 2012 at 08:49
(已編輯Aug 21, 2012 at 08:52)
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
vladrac posted:
Though I appreciate you sharing the free EA, hopefuly with authors details.
Im not sure I endorse cracking other peoples EA and sharing it , even if you believe its a copy.
Regards,
Vlad
That's precisely why there are so many crooks around, they capitalised on such noble perceptions and proliferate with impunity. You have the liberty not to download it if you think those crooks have a right to claim the EA as theirs. There are many other commercial EAs out there that are just clones of free EAs available on the internet, but Bunny EA is special to me because it is one that I had modified/enhanced from another free EA many years ago and had it published to the internet for everyone to download it without cost. I had to expose these crooks who are selling the EA.
Rgds..
Aug 21, 2012 at 08:59
會員從Jul 31, 2012開始
210帖子
ah... that changes the picture. I did not know the original code was yours.
if thats really the case, I believe you have all the rights to fight for your copyrights privileges. Instead of posting things here, cant you really have a law suit against them?
And yes, I did seen many commercial EAs just modifying codes of other EAs.
Personally I have used indicators and logic from other EA and made them into more profitable EA for myself. Im not selling them though ;)
if thats really the case, I believe you have all the rights to fight for your copyrights privileges. Instead of posting things here, cant you really have a law suit against them?
And yes, I did seen many commercial EAs just modifying codes of other EAs.
Personally I have used indicators and logic from other EA and made them into more profitable EA for myself. Im not selling them though ;)
vladrac@

forex_trader_55397
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
Aug 21, 2012 at 09:32
(已編輯Aug 21, 2012 at 09:34)
會員從Dec 02, 2011開始
49帖子
Vladrac, the original codes belonged to an anonymous individual who had published it to the internet. Since then, various individuals from the public had made modifications/enhancements to the original codes. I was one of those individuals. There are many other versions of this EA too, it comes in various names too due to this. Therefore, no one can actually claim any rights to this EA. It's freely available on the internet and anyone can modify/enhance it. I'm only against those crooks who are selling an EA which is readily available for everyone to download freely from the internet. Not here in contention for any rights because there are none in the first place. 😄
會員從Dec 08, 2010開始
139帖子
Aug 21, 2012 at 14:23
會員從Dec 08, 2010開始
139帖子
Meta4r3x posted:
Vladrac, the original codes belonged to an anonymous individual who had published it to the internet. Since then, various individuals from the public had made modifications/enhancements to the original codes. I was one of those individuals. There are many other versions of this EA too, it comes in various names too due to this. Therefore, no one can actually claim any rights to this EA. It's freely available on the internet and anyone can modify/enhance it. I'm only against those crooks who are selling an EA which is readily available for everyone to download freely from the internet. Not here in contention for any rights because there are none in the first place. 😄
Nice move😄
Courage is not the absence of fear,but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear
會員從Jul 02, 2012開始
127帖子

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。