Advertisement
FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari (由 stevetrade)
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
FRWC - Fusion V - Alpari討論
會員從Mar 08, 2010開始
15帖子
Apr 07, 2010 at 01:35
Refunded through FRWC, didn't need to go to Plimus thankfully. I guess they're not ALL dodgy.
Apr 07, 2010 at 01:50
(已編輯Apr 07, 2010 at 01:50)
Fusion clowns were handing out canned autoresponders
with full email boxes that bounced back. They were not
responding to Plimus or to customers. And now they are.
Clearly, Plimus and/or FXCM threatened the Fusion morons.
Now, they are all of a sudden responsive with direct
refunds? Clearly, they were threatened.
with full email boxes that bounced back. They were not
responding to Plimus or to customers. And now they are.
Clearly, Plimus and/or FXCM threatened the Fusion morons.
Now, they are all of a sudden responsive with direct
refunds? Clearly, they were threatened.
Dukascopy rules !!!
Apr 07, 2010 at 02:16
(已編輯Apr 07, 2010 at 02:45)
so far never see anyone get even near or half of live result as FRWC had. a lot of lost live result, yes. don't talk about 354%. wondering whether they are working hand in glove to get this result. now FRWC are promoting more in EA lab !!!!!
會員從Mar 30, 2010開始
14帖子
Apr 09, 2010 at 00:42
Could anybody send me the FRWC user manual? Thank you very much, my email address is [email protected]😄
rickcui@
forex_trader_5077
會員從Dec 30, 2009開始
23帖子
Apr 09, 2010 at 03:30
JazzmanWA posted:
Hey look, it's on sale again! Same price, same BS advertising. "ONLY 50 copies will be sold!!!"
You don't say. Better hurry and buy one before the last 50 go away! Bwahahaha!!!
"GET The Indisputable 3 Best Auto-Income Forex Robots In The World" ... Yeah, I'm pretty sure I can find some people to dispute that with live account data. Hell, I can dispute that claim with their own account. You know, the Fusion account that mysteriously disappeared from their lab area... I attached a screen shot of that Fusion MT4 account using the investor password.
So if they're so transparent, why did this account disappear without explanation??? That's not transparency, it's blatant manipulation. They've proven that they will hide poor performance and showcase positive results on accounts that use excessive risk.
And, they still show the 354.37% in 19 days results!!! It was one thing to do that right after those results were realized however, since then FRWC themselves have lost at least 43.4% with Fusion. That is now blatant false advertisement. That's not even considering the other live statistics that people have tracked. This alone is enough to dismiss these clowns as frauds. They know the real performance but still have the lack of ethics necessary to lie to the public.
They are completely untrustworthy now, in my book.
And, the way they handled the refund fiasco is really embarrassing. I don't think they will survive, but they might be better con-artists then I'm giving them credit for.
I absolutely despise unethical people! They've had plenty of time to be honest. FRWC = FAIL
forex_trader_5077
會員從Dec 30, 2009開始
23帖子
Apr 09, 2010 at 03:32
(已編輯Apr 09, 2010 at 03:34)
The post above also contains the detailed transaction report and equity curve. The spike you see is a deposit followed by a withdrawal, it is not trading related. See the report to confirm it.
forex_trader_5077
會員從Dec 30, 2009開始
23帖子
Apr 09, 2010 at 03:38
I just noticed, they have an "Asset Manager" section at the bottom of the sales page. More HYPE! Oh, you've been getting a lot of requests from asset managers to license your B.S.... it must be good. lol What a joke.
Apr 09, 2010 at 04:42
They are trying to sell at this webiste too: http://forexrobotstest.com/index.html?a=7
forex_trader_7497
會員從Feb 20, 2010開始
50帖子
Apr 09, 2010 at 09:16
My bet is they don't have any single customer left who does not request a refund.
會員從Mar 30, 2010開始
14帖子
Apr 14, 2010 at 03:42
Straasha was a good system, but if work well, it need 2 conditions:
1. The account must at least have 2500 dollars;
2. It must run along, not run another EA in one account, because the Straasha MM setting could conflicted with other system.
1. The account must at least have 2500 dollars;
2. It must run along, not run another EA in one account, because the Straasha MM setting could conflicted with other system.
rickcui@
Apr 14, 2010 at 07:17
They can and they do survive. However you need to know how to run a martingale and all martingales are not the same. Some have math that is very logical making recovery much better than others. I trade martingales all the time and never blow my account. But if you do not trade my way with them they are very dangerous like anything else you need to know how to handle them
Randy
Randy
會員從Mar 30, 2010開始
14帖子
Apr 14, 2010 at 09:42
Randy:
What's your trading way of martingale EA?
What's your trading way of martingale EA?
rickcui@
會員從Sep 04, 2009開始
849帖子
Apr 14, 2010 at 14:01
Its a long and hard way to create a sophisticated Marty. Nobody will publish how they work I guess. Me neither😉
May 02, 2010 at 18:13
dollar cost averaging/martingale/carry trades works 100% in theory with unlimited fund in my opinion. ur $100 is an unlimited fund if u marty by $1 trade every 100 pips doing a carry on a long aud/usd position. at some point a single sheer of luck or a technical rebound can bring ur port back to black. but theories doesnt involved emotions. in real life drama, greed persist to be a big factor. patience is next.
God is great all the time
