Advertisement
FXStabilizerAUD - Durable
該使用者已經刪除了這個系統。
FXStabilizerAUD - Durable討論
會員從May 20, 2016開始
19帖子
Jul 09, 2016 at 19:37
fx_skill posted:choilun123 posted:
HI,
I'd like to ask about the EA, it have had different orders from backtest to real account. what is the detection for open order?
Is it real safe when differ from BT?
I may put large capital for durable mode and use 100% auto risk when the risk is real calculated.
Regards,
Adrian
Results of backtest is depends on quality of quotes. Bad history data can be even with 99% modelling quality. It's depends on history gaps. We don't saw difference of real trading from backtesting results but it's possible. Any way live trading is more important and it has more relevance. The main thing, that all our customers have the same results as we are have at our live account. FXStabilizer uses indicator to detect when trend already safe for system and EA open the trade.
Please for more information and more quick response contact us here: [email protected]
Thanks for ur replies.
Anyway, I have one additional question. In case the market's volatility is being rapid, the spread has much larger than normal (over 100 pips) Maybe on 2008 Oct. etc. This would touch the SL and blow the account as seem like very tight on the last martigale. Do yours recommend to use Fixed spread account instead of flowing one? Thanks for reply again.
Adrian
forex_trader_76137
會員從May 03, 2012開始
57帖子
Jul 17, 2016 at 13:21
choilun123 posted:fx_skill posted:choilun123 posted:
HI,
I'd like to ask about the EA, it have had different orders from backtest to real account. what is the detection for open order?
Is it real safe when differ from BT?
I may put large capital for durable mode and use 100% auto risk when the risk is real calculated.
Regards,
Adrian
Results of backtest is depends on quality of quotes. Bad history data can be even with 99% modelling quality. It's depends on history gaps. We don't saw difference of real trading from backtesting results but it's possible. Any way live trading is more important and it has more relevance. The main thing, that all our customers have the same results as we are have at our live account. FXStabilizer uses indicator to detect when trend already safe for system and EA open the trade.
Please for more information and more quick response contact us here: [email protected]
Thanks for ur replies.
Anyway, I have one additional question. In case the market's volatility is being rapid, the spread has much larger than normal (over 100 pips) Maybe on 2008 Oct. etc. This would touch the SL and blow the account as seem like very tight on the last martigale. Do yours recommend to use Fixed spread account instead of flowing one? Thanks for reply again.
Adrian
Yes, we prefer to use fixed spread. On our real account we have 3 pips spread at AUDUSD (at many brokers it could be 2 pips) and we have good results. But it works well with floating spread too. For all the time we have no bad feedbacks from customers with floating spread.
會員從May 20, 2016開始
19帖子
Jul 31, 2016 at 06:48
Hi Vendor,
Just test with 5-digit broker @ 10pips (1pip in 4-digit) on Oct 2008. There is a differ in 6th Oct and blow up the martingale. If change the spread to 20pips (same as yours test), that is as same as yours. So very confused about yours EA wether in trap with accuracy mistake. Pls notice that matter. Thanks.
BR,
Adrian
Just test with 5-digit broker @ 10pips (1pip in 4-digit) on Oct 2008. There is a differ in 6th Oct and blow up the martingale. If change the spread to 20pips (same as yours test), that is as same as yours. So very confused about yours EA wether in trap with accuracy mistake. Pls notice that matter. Thanks.
BR,
Adrian
forex_trader_76137
會員從May 03, 2012開始
57帖子
Aug 03, 2016 at 22:31
choilun123 posted:
Hi Vendor,
Just test with 5-digit broker @ 10pips (1pip in 4-digit) on Oct 2008. There is a differ in 6th Oct and blow up the martingale. If change the spread to 20pips (same as yours test), that is as same as yours. So very confused about yours EA wether in trap with accuracy mistake. Pls notice that matter. Thanks.
BR,
Adrian
Hello Adrian,
Thank you for this information. Please send us this backtest to our support: [email protected] . Also it's needs to be checked quotes for gaps (price holes) at that period on visualization mode. Possibly it's just a bad quality of history quotes. Any way we will solve the problem if it takes place.
會員從Dec 15, 2016開始
4帖子
Dec 18, 2016 at 08:55
the EA does not work anymore?
why?
why?
會員從May 20, 2016開始
19帖子
Dec 23, 2016 at 12:37
so soon to blow up...so disappointed
會員從May 04, 2012開始
1534帖子
Dec 24, 2016 at 18:24
(已編輯Dec 24, 2016 at 18:25)
One day's losses have wiped out ALL profits since April 15, 2015...
20 months' gains are gone in a flash...
The only problem with Maringales is not IF, but WHEN such things happen...
20 months' gains are gone in a flash...
The only problem with Maringales is not IF, but WHEN such things happen...
Jan 23, 2023 at 03:45
Hi Fx_Skill,
How are you? Is there a way to make this EA bot comply with US FIFO rule? Thanks!
Basically, FIFO doesn't allow US broker to sell or buy the same lot size until first order is closed.
For example,
Order #1 Sell 0.01 lot - OK
Order #2 Sell 0.01 lot - Not allow
Order #1 Sell 0.01 lot - Ok
Order #2 Buy 0.01 lot - OK
Order #3 Sell 0.01 lot - OK
Regards,
Tom
How are you? Is there a way to make this EA bot comply with US FIFO rule? Thanks!
Basically, FIFO doesn't allow US broker to sell or buy the same lot size until first order is closed.
For example,
Order #1 Sell 0.01 lot - OK
Order #2 Sell 0.01 lot - Not allow
Order #1 Sell 0.01 lot - Ok
Order #2 Buy 0.01 lot - OK
Order #3 Sell 0.01 lot - OK
Regards,
Tom
*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍，並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示：發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中！
提示：鍵入@符號，自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。
