Million Dollar Pips (由 milliondpips)
收益: | +26241.17% |
縮減 | 39.44% |
點: | 5202.2 |
交易 | 4497 |
贏得: |
|
損失:。 |
|
類型: | 演示 |
杠杆率: | 1:200 |
交易: | 自動的 |
Edit Your Comment
Million Dollar Pips討論
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
Dec 13, 2011 at 00:22
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
I am yet to see any slippage with pending orders. In retail forex 99% liquidity is provided by your broker, so talking about liquidity in regards to filling your order is nonsense unless you trade directly with bank and execute 100-lots positions. Liquidity all are concerned about influence market moves (they become unsustainable which is good for MDP) and spreads that rise (which is bad but if spread is over the top MDP won't trade).
Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.
會員從Dec 15, 2010開始
784帖子
Dec 13, 2011 at 05:20
會員從Jan 31, 2011開始
720帖子
mistificator posted:
I am yet to see any slippage with pending orders. In retail forex 99% liquidity is provided by your broker, so talking about liquidity in regards to filling your order is nonsense unless you trade directly with bank and execute 100-lots positions. Liquidity all are concerned about influence market moves (they become unsustainable which is good for MDP) and spreads that rise (which is bad but if spread is over the top MDP won't trade).
That is correct. If you are trading with a dealing desk broker, you won't have your slippage increased. You will start seeing longer fill times and requotes. You will only see greater slippage with ECN and STP brokers.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
Dec 13, 2011 at 07:30
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
I don't see any point in trading with broker that would slip you constantly be it MDP or something else. It only means their market making ability or their liquidity provider's market making ability sucks or non-exist. Market making is good for traders, otherwise spreads would be huge and slippage dramatic. Thus said, my broker is also ECN/STP. But this model of operating does not forbid to make market as long as they always pass the best price, be it from liquidity providers or themselves.
Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.
Dec 13, 2011 at 17:01
會員從Oct 18, 2011開始
55帖子
amag80 posted:
Anyone want to purchase MDP lic one for $60 or 2 License for $100.00
Why would you want to sell it. You could easy make back your purchase money in a few trades or even in one trade.
Selling takes soo much effort and for what... $100 that is the price of a used toothpick in the forex world
Plan your trade, trade your plan
會員從Aug 12, 2011開始
40帖子
Dec 13, 2011 at 19:00
會員從Aug 12, 2011開始
40帖子
MetaCoder posted:
in live trading environ This EA is a pip from worthless
On what do you base your statement? I have almost tripled my money in less that 6 months. if that's worthless than you need to stop wasting this forums time. Why don't you show your results with this ea on myfxbook? If you had poor results that led to that statement I can understand that.
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
Dec 13, 2011 at 19:17
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
Same as with manual trading: you need to have a portfolio of trading methods for different trading conditions. Currently I have FGB down but manual trading offsets odd MDP losses and slowly builds account up.. But as you say when time is right MDP rocks.
fughe posted:
Not when the market is right for it! 😁
Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
Dec 13, 2011 at 21:23
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
I think my mistake is I don't trust enough my own trading, despite the fact I am positive most of the time..
fughe posted:
I make more money trading manually than anything.....
hey MetaCoder, let us know what you have experienced with MDP, and you broker and VPS. Maybe we can help you sort it out.
Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.
Dec 13, 2011 at 22:02
會員從Jan 31, 2011開始
720帖子
jsintl posted:
Frankly, I cannot make this EA profitable for me. This EA will place trades on spikes and hope for the best.
You have described the trading style of every EA ever created, not including the spike part. EAs are literally playing a game of statistics. It requires a human to process enough info to make "informed" decisions about trades. To even approach human capacity, a system would require a mainframe to function.
Make losses, but always come out a winner at the end.
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
會員從Aug 16, 2010開始
450帖子
會員從Oct 03, 2011開始
22帖子

*商業用途和垃圾郵件將不被容忍,並可能導致帳戶終止。
提示:發佈圖片/YouTube網址會自動嵌入到您的帖子中!
提示:鍵入@符號,自動完成參與此討論的用戶名。